Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Valorant
FPS 2020

Valorant

86%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
567 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
339 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
488 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
291 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
389 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
231 FPS
2.8ms Frame Time
4ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,584
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 27,029
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 231 243 254 389
1440p QHD 291 302 320 488
1080p Full HD 339 354 375 567

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 354
1920x1080 Low 567
1920x1080 Medium 375
1920x1080 Ultra 339
2560x1440 High 302
2560x1440 Low 488
2560x1440 Medium 320
2560x1440 Ultra 291
3840x2160 High 243
3840x2160 Low 389
3840x2160 Medium 254
3840x2160 Ultra 231

Performance Analysis: Valorant on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers exceptional performance in Valorant, a title that is far more demanding on CPU throughput than on GPU fill rate. Measured data shows that this combination never drops below the playable threshold of 60 FPS; in fact, the lowest average recorded across all tested configurations is 230.9 FPS at 4K Ultra settings. The data indicates a system that is not merely playable but overwhelmingly capable, with average frame rates ranging from 230.9 FPS to a peak of 566.6 FPS depending on resolution and preset. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes the hardware ranking, and provides actionable settings guidance for each resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and four quality presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra). All figures represent average FPS; minimum and maximum frame time data were not provided in the benchmark results.

1920x1080 (1080p)

  • Low: 566.6 FPS average
  • Medium: 374.8 FPS average
  • High: 354.4 FPS average
  • Ultra: 338.7 FPS average

At 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound. The jump from Low to Medium is substantial, a drop of 191.8 FPS, indicating that even moderate settings changes expose a bottleneck beyond raw GPU speed. The spread from Medium to Ultra is much narrower—a 36.1 FPS difference between Medium and Ultra—suggesting that the GPU handles higher fidelity settings with diminishing performance losses as the CPU becomes the limiting factor.

2560x1440 (1440p)

  • Low: 488 FPS average
  • Medium: 319.6 FPS average
  • High: 301.8 FPS average
  • Ultra: 291 FPS average

Moving to 1440p introduces more GPU load, but the performance hierarchy remains consistent. The Low preset still achieves a massive 488 FPS average, while Ultra settles at 291 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 197 FPS, which is proportionally similar to the 1080p results. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a performance drop of 78.6 FPS on Low (from 566.6 to 488) and 47.7 FPS on Ultra (from 338.7 to 291), demonstrating that the GPU is beginning to contribute more to the frame time at higher resolutions.

3840x2160 (4K)

  • Low: 389.2 FPS average
  • Medium: 254.4 FPS average
  • High: 243.1 FPS average
  • Ultra: 230.9 FPS average

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver of performance. The Low preset still yields a remarkable 389.2 FPS average, but the cost of higher settings is more pronounced. Medium drops to 254.4 FPS, a 134.8 FPS reduction from Low. High and Ultra are closer, with only a 12.2 FPS difference between them. The data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the system delivers nearly four times the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and the Intel Arc B580 holds a combo rank of 2533 out of 3708 tested combinations in Valorant. This places the system in the 68th percentile of all tested combos, meaning it outperforms roughly 68% of the configurations in the database for this specific game.

The CPU, Intel Core i5-14400F, sits at the 83rd percentile among all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32279. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 32233 (a 0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i9-11900, scoring 32226 (a 0.2% delta). The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is slightly ahead at 32354 (a -0.2% delta from the i5-14400F), and the Intel Core i7-12800H trails at 32121 (a 0.5% delta). These margins are negligible, indicating that the i5-14400F is competitively positioned within its performance class.

The GPU, Intel Arc B580, holds the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, scoring 23061 (a -0.2% delta). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895 (a 0.6% delta), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172 (a -0.7% delta). The NVIDIA P106-100 leads the group at 23249 (a -1% delta). In the context of Valorant, the ranking suggests that the GPU is sufficient for high frame rates, but the CPU's strong single-thread performance is what pushes this combo toward the top of the cumulative ranking.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Valorant?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 566.6, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Can this system run Valorant at 4K resolution?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with average FPS ranging from 230.9 (Ultra) to 389.2 (Low).

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 338.7 at 1920x1080 to 230.9 at 3840x2160, a decrease of 107.8 FPS. At Low settings, the drop is 177.4 FPS, from 566.6 to 389.2.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-14400F a bottleneck for the Intel Arc B580 in this game?

A: The data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is the primary limiter, as evidenced by the large FPS drop between Low (566.6) and Medium (374.8). At 4K, the GPU becomes more influential, with a smaller relative drop between presets.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F + Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2533 out of 3708 tested combos in Valorant.

Q: Does the system exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold at all settings?

A: Yes. The lowest average FPS recorded is 230.9 at 4K Ultra, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Valorant, and it does so with overwhelming headroom. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: every tested resolution and preset combination is playable.

At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold by a massive margin. The best settings are Ultra, which delivers an average of 338.7 FPS. Even the most demanding preset at this resolution leaves the playable threshold far behind.

At 2560x1440, performance remains exceptional. Ultra settings produce an average of 291 FPS, which is still nearly five times the playable threshold. All presets are viable, with Low achieving 488 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers high refresh rate performance. Ultra settings yield an average of 230.9 FPS, while Low reaches 389.2 FPS. No settings configuration at any resolution drops below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The data confirms that this hardware combination is overqualified for Valorant's engine, which favors high clock speeds and strong single-core performance. Users with high refresh rate monitors (144Hz, 240Hz, or beyond) will find that the system can push frame rates to match the display's capabilities at 1080p and 1440p, and even at 4K, the frame rates are suitable for competitive play on high refresh rate displays.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14400F provide a clear picture of comparable CPU performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is the closest match, with an average benchmark score of 32233, a mere 0.1% difference from the i5-14400F's 32279. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226 (0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32354 (-0.2% delta). The Intel Core i7-12800H is slightly further behind at 32121 (0.5% delta). For Valorant, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates, as the single-thread performance is the dominant factor.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B580's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which scores 23061 (-0.2% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, scoring 22895 (0.6% delta). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172 (-0.7% delta), and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249 (-1% delta). In Valorant, the GPU is less critical than the CPU, so the choice among these cards would have a minimal impact on the final FPS at 1080p, though the differences would become more apparent at 4K Ultra settings.

A system built around the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS CPU would perform essentially identically to the i5-14400F in this game, as would a system with the Intel Core i9-11900. For the GPU, swapping the Arc B580 for an RTX 2080 or RTX 3080 would yield similar results, with the RTX 3080 providing a marginal edge in GPU-bound scenarios such as 4K Ultra.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is, at every resolution, the Ultra preset. The system never approaches the 60 FPS threshold, so the best settings are always the highest quality available.

  • 1920x1080: Ultra settings, 338.7 FPS average.
  • 2560x1440: Ultra settings, 291 FPS average.
  • 3840x2160: Ultra settings, 230.9 FPS average.

For users prioritizing maximum frame rates over visual fidelity, the Low preset at 1080p offers the highest possible FPS at 566.6. However, given the enormous headroom, there is no practical reason to sacrifice visual quality for performance; the Ultra preset at any resolution provides frame rates that are far beyond the requirements of any display refresh rate commonly available.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is heavily CPU-bound. The evidence is in the scaling between presets: moving from Low to Medium at 1080p causes a 191.8 FPS drop (from 566.6 to 374.8), which is a dramatic reduction. This indicates that the CPU's ability to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic is the limiting factor once the GPU is no longer bottlenecked by resolution. The relatively small difference between Medium (374.8) and Ultra (338.7) at 1080p further confirms that the GPU can handle the increased fidelity without significant cost, leaving the CPU as the primary constraint.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a more significant role. The drop from Low to Medium is 168.4 FPS (from 488 to 319.6), which is still substantial, but the overall frame rates are lower than at 1080p. The scaling from High (301.8) to Ultra (291) is a mere 10.8 FPS, suggesting that the GPU is now handling a larger portion of the frame time, but the CPU is still influential.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The performance gap between Low (389.2) and Medium (254.4) is 134.8 FPS, but the gap between High (243.1) and Ultra (230.9) is only 12.2 FPS. The overall reduction in frame rates compared to 1080p and 1440p is a direct result of the increased pixel count, which loads the GPU's shading and rasterization units. The CPU's role is diminished, as the GPU is now the primary bottleneck.

In summary, the Intel Core i5-14400F's strong single-thread performance is the key driver of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, while the Intel Arc B580's raw throughput becomes the limiting factor at 4K. The data shows that this pairing is well-balanced for Valorant, with the CPU providing enough headroom to push frame rates into the hundreds at lower resolutions, and the GPU maintaining playable, high-refresh-rate performance even at 4K.