Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Undisputed
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 74 | 89 | 123 |
| 1440p QHD | 78 | 120 | 140 | 198 |
| 1080p Full HD | 104 | 165 | 198 | 272 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Undisputed on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a remarkably strong performance profile for Undisputed, a sports title that clearly favors high frame rates over raw graphical fidelity. Benchmark data shows the pairing handles 1080p and 1440p with ease, even at the Ultra preset, while 4K demands a slight settings compromise to maintain a smooth experience. The data indicates a well-balanced system where the CPU’s high multi-threaded throughput and the GPU’s efficient Ada Lovelace architecture combine to produce consistently high average FPS values across all tested resolutions.
FAQ
Q: What is the best settings preset to use for 4K gameplay?
A: At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS, achieving an average of 74.2 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the playable threshold at 49.9 FPS.
Q: Can this combo run the game at 1440p with maximum visual quality?
A: Yes. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 78.2 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: How much performance headroom is there at 1080p?
A: The system has substantial headroom. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 104.3 FPS, while the Low preset reaches 272.2 FPS, indicating the GPU is rarely the limiting factor at this resolution.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck in this game?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary scaling factor. Dropping from Ultra to Low at 4K increases performance by roughly 73 FPS (from 49.9 to 123), showing the GPU is heavily taxed at higher settings, while resolution scaling also points to GPU dependency.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for this game?
A: The combination ranks 1985th out of 3718 tested configurations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of systems capable of running Undisputed.
Q: What is the performance difference between the High and Medium presets at 4K?
A: The High preset averages 74.2 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 88.7 FPS. Both are playable, but High offers a 14.5 FPS improvement over Medium at this resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data for Undisputed reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i7-14700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, with the GPU taking on the dominant role in determining frame rates as resolution and settings increase. The CPU’s substantial multi-threaded capability—scoring 35,122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 41,317 in Passmark multithread—provides a robust foundation that ensures the processor is rarely a hindrance. However, the frame rate scaling across presets strongly indicates that the RTX 4060 is the performance arbiter.
Evidence for GPU dominance is most apparent at 3840x2160. At this resolution, the Low preset produces 123 FPS, but increasing to Medium drops the average to 88.7 FPS, a 28% reduction in performance. The High preset further reduces the average to 74.2 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls below playability at 49.9 FPS. This steep decline across presets is classic GPU-bound behavior, as the RTX 4060’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus width become strained by higher-resolution textures and effects. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 19,545, while respectable, places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, confirming it is a mid-range part that requires settings management at 4K.
At lower resolutions, the balance shifts slightly. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 78.2 FPS, indicating the GPU can handle higher settings when pixel count is reduced. The gap between Low (197.6 FPS) and Ultra (78.2 FPS) at 1440p is still substantial, but the overall performance is high enough that the CPU’s role becomes more relevant. The i7-14700F’s single-core performance—scoring 4,958 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,257 in Passmark single-thread—ensures the game’s physics and AI calculations are processed without creating a bottleneck that would limit the GPU.
The resolution scaling further clarifies this dynamic. Moving from 1080p Ultra (104.3 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (78.2 FPS) represents a 25% performance drop, while moving from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra (49.9 FPS) is a 36% drop. These figures demonstrate that the frame rate is sensitive to pixel count, a hallmark of GPU-limited rendering. The CPU’s benchmarks, including a Geekbench multi-core score of 19,620, show it has ample headroom to feed the GPU at all settings, but the RTX 4060’s compute resources—15.11 TFLOPS FP32—are the limiting factor when visual demands escalate. In summary, the RTX 4060 dictates playable settings, while the i7-14700F ensures the system never falls behind in game logic.
Best Settings per Resolution
For players targeting a consistent 60 FPS experience, the measured data provides clear guidance on the maximum settings available at each resolution.
At 3840x2160, the High preset is the optimal choice. It delivers an average of 74.2 FPS, which comfortably exceeds the playable threshold. While the Medium preset offers a higher average of 88.7 FPS, High provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The Ultra preset must be avoided, as its 49.9 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS target.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is fully playable. The data shows an average of 78.2 FPS, which provides enough headroom to handle intense in-game moments without dropping below the threshold. This is the most demanding setting at this resolution and the best choice for visual fidelity. Lower presets are unnecessary, as even High (120 FPS) and Medium (139.7 FPS) are available but offer diminishing returns in visual quality.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the definitive choice, achieving an average of 104.3 FPS. This frame rate is high enough to drive a 100 Hz or 120 Hz monitor effectively. The gap between Ultra and High (164.5 FPS) is noticeable, but Ultra remains well above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended setting for maximum visual detail. The Low preset’s 272.2 FPS is excessive for most displays but demonstrates the system’s extreme headroom at this resolution.
The Verdict
This PC configuration is unequivocally capable of running Undisputed at playable frame rates across all tested resolutions, provided the settings are adjusted appropriately.
At 1920x1080, the system excels. All four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 104.3 FPS. This makes the combo ideal for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming.
At 2560x1440, the verdict is equally positive. The Ultra preset achieves 78.2 FPS, meaning players can enjoy maximum settings without any compromises. The High, Medium, and Low presets are also playable, with averages of 120, 139.7, and 197.6 FPS respectively.
At 3840x2160, the system remains playable but requires a settings reduction. The High preset is the best option, delivering 74.2 FPS. Medium is also viable at 88.7 FPS, while Low reaches 123 FPS. The Ultra preset fails to meet the 60 FPS standard at 49.9 FPS, so it should be avoided. Overall, the data confirms this is a capable 4K gaming system for Undisputed as long as players use High or Medium settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 provide insight into what other hardware would deliver comparable performance in this system.
On the CPU side, the i7-14700F’s average benchmark score of 53,620 is closely matched by several other processors. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53,701, a negligible 0.2% difference, making it a direct performance equivalent. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469, just 0.3% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288, a 0.6% deficit. The AMD EPYC 7313P completes the group at 53,206, 0.8% lower. Any of these CPUs would provide nearly identical frame rates in Undisputed when paired with the RTX 4060, as the game does not appear to be CPU-limited in this configuration.
For the GPU, the RTX 4060’s average benchmark score of 17,639 is closely matched by a set of older and integrated graphics solutions. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17,666, a 0.2% margin, making it a surprisingly close performance sibling. The AMD Radeon 780M integrated GPU scores 17,588, 0.3% behind, suggesting that a system using this iGPU would see similar frame rates in less demanding scenarios. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17,551, 0.5% behind) and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17,509, 0.7% behind) round out the list. It is important to note that these GPU rivals are significantly older or lower-power parts, meaning the RTX 4060’s modern feature set, such as its 24 RT cores and 96 Tensor cores, offers advantages beyond raw benchmark scores that may matter in other titles.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader landscape of tested hardware for Undisputed, this specific combination of the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 holds a solid position. The combo rank is 1985 out of 3,718 total tested configurations, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all systems.
This ranking indicates that while the combo is not at the advanced of performance, it sits comfortably in the upper half of systems capable of running the game. The rank is influenced by both components: the CPU’s 91st percentile standing among all CPUs (with an average benchmark score of 53,620) is a strong contributor, while the GPU’s 61st percentile (average score of 17,639) tempers the overall position. The measured frame rates confirm that this mid-tier ranking translates to a highly enjoyable experience in Undisputed, as the game’s requirements are modest enough for the combo to exceed 60 FPS at all playable presets. The 2,000-place gap between this combo and the top performers is largely due to the GPU, as higher-end graphics cards would push the rank much higher, but the practical differences in FPS are less pronounced in this particular title.