Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Undisputed
Sports 2023

Undisputed

46%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
127 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
49 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
92 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
35 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
58 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
22 FPS
13.2ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,549
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 27,247
Your GPU 1,482

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 22 35 42 58
1440p QHD 35 55 66 92
1080p Full HD 49 76 91 127

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 76
1920x1080 Low 127
1920x1080 Medium 91
1920x1080 Ultra 49
2560x1440 High 55
2560x1440 Low 92
2560x1440 Medium 66
2560x1440 Ultra 35
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 58
3840x2160 Medium 42
3840x2160 Ultra 22

Performance Analysis: Undisputed on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 4K, the Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the Intel Arc B390 delivers a narrow band of playability. The High preset averages 35 FPS, which falls well short of the 60 FPS threshold. Dropping to Medium improves the average to 42 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 36 and maximum of 48. The Low preset at 3840x2160 reaches 58 FPS on average, still below the target. Ultra is the most demanding setting and yields only 22 FPS, making it effectively unusable at this resolution. The data shows a steep drop from Low to High at 4K, a 23 FPS gap that underscores how heavily the integrated-class GPU is taxed at this pixel count.

Moving to 2560x1440, the picture improves considerably. The Low preset averages 92 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS bar with a comfortable margin. Medium follows at 66 FPS average, with a minimum of 56 and maximum of 76. High drops to 55 FPS average, just below the playable threshold. Ultra at this resolution produces 35 FPS on average, matching the 4K High result. The scaling from 4K to 1440p is significant: Low jumps from 58 to 92 FPS, while Medium goes from 42 to 66 FPS. This suggests the Arc B390 has enough headroom at 1440p to handle lower presets without compromise.

At 1920x1080, the combo shows its strongest performance. Low averages 127 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold. Medium averages 91 FPS, with a minimum of 78 and maximum of 105, indicating consistent frame delivery. High averages 76 FPS, still comfortably above 60. Ultra drops to 49 FPS, failing the threshold. The 1080p results reveal a clear hierarchy: the most demanding preset is the only one that cannot hold 60 FPS, while every other setting provides a smooth experience. The gap between Ultra and High at 1080p is 27 FPS, a larger delta than at 1440p, which suggests the Ultra preset imposes a heavy load that this GPU cannot sustain at any resolution tested.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU sits in a strong position relative to its nearest rivals. The Intel Core i5-14400F posts an average benchmark score of 32279, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all tested CPUs. The closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, which scores 32354, a delta of -0.2 percent, meaning the i5-14400F trails by a negligible margin. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32233, just 0.1 percent behind the i5-14400F. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, a 0.2 percent deficit. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, which is 0.5 percent lower. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, so any of these CPUs would produce virtually identical frame pacing in Undisputed. The i5-14400F is effectively interchangeable with these processors for this game, meaning the GPU is the limiting factor in every scenario.

The GPU presents a starkly different situation. The Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1482, landing in the 9th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all legacy NVIDIA parts. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX scores 1463, a delta of 1.3 percent in favor of the Arc B390. The NVIDIA GeForce 800M scores 1460, 1.5 percent behind. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1446, a 2.5 percent gap. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 scores 1443, 2.7 percent lower. These deltas are small, but the absolute performance level is very low. Anyone considering hardware in this GPU tier should expect similar frame rates in Undisputed, with the Arc B390 holding a slight edge over the closest alternatives. The CPU, by contrast, is not a bottleneck at any resolution, as its rivals all sit within 0.5 percent of its score.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded data indicates that the Intel Arc B390 is the dominant constraint in Undisputed. At 3840x2160, the CPU's high percentile ranking does not prevent the frame rate from collapsing to 35 FPS on High and 22 FPS on Ultra. The GPU's 9th percentile standing aligns with these results: the Arc B390 simply lacks the throughput to drive modern sports titles at high pixel counts. The CPU's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 11268, is more than sufficient for this game's workload. The bottleneck is clearly on the graphics side.

Resolution scaling confirms this interpretation. From 1080p Low to 4K Low, the average FPS drops from 127 to 58, a 54 percent reduction. From 1080p Medium to 1440p Medium, the average falls from 91 to 66, a 27 percent drop. These reductions are consistent with GPU-bound behavior, where increasing pixel count directly taxes the renderer. The CPU's load does not scale with resolution in the same way, so the consistent FPS decline across resolutions points to the Arc B390 as the limiting factor. At 1080p, the CPU can feed the GPU adequately, as shown by the 127 FPS Low result, but even at that resolution the Ultra preset drops to 49 FPS, indicating the GPU cannot handle the extra shading and post-processing load.

Preset scaling reinforces the same conclusion. At every resolution, the jump from Medium to Ultra produces a larger FPS loss than the jump from Low to Medium. At 1440p, Low averages 92 FPS, Medium 66 FPS, and Ultra 35 FPS. The 31 FPS gap between Medium and Ultra is more than double the 26 FPS gap between Low and Medium. This pattern is typical of a GPU that runs out of compute or memory bandwidth on higher presets, not a CPU limitation. The i5-14400F, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, has ample headroom for a sports title like Undisputed, so the component roles are clear: the CPU is a bystander, and the GPU dictates playability.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Undisputed depends entirely on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on Low, Medium, and High presets, with averages of 127, 91, and 76 FPS respectively. The 1080p High preset is the best playable option, delivering 76 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system clears 60 FPS on Low and Medium, with averages of 92 and 66 FPS. The 1440p Medium preset is the best playable option, averaging 66 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The Low preset comes closest at 58 FPS, but it still falls short. The verdict by resolution is clear: this combo is playable at 1080p and 1440p with the right presets, but not at 4K. The Ultra preset fails at every resolution, and High fails at 1440p and 4K. Users targeting 60 FPS should stick to 1080p High or 1440p Medium as their ceiling.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database, this CPU and GPU combination ranks 3304 out of 3718 tested combos for Undisputed. That places it in the lower portion of the distribution, near the 11th percentile of all combinations. The rank reflects the GPU's weak standing more than the CPU's. The i5-14400F alone sits in the 83rd percentile among CPUs, but the Arc B390's 9th percentile among GPUs drags the overall combo down. The gap between the component percentiles explains why the system can hit high frame rates at low presets and low resolutions, but falls apart at 4K or Ultra settings. The rank also indicates that most other tested combinations in the database would outperform this setup in Undisputed, though the specific rivals listed for the CPU and GPU show that the nearest performance matches are tightly clustered. The CPU's rivals all score within 0.5 percent, and the GPU's rivals all score within 2.7 percent, so swapping to any of those parts would produce similar results.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The closest is Low at 58 FPS, but since it does not reach the 60 FPS threshold, the database records no best settings for this resolution. The verdict is unplayable at 4K regardless of preset. At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, averaging 66 FPS with a minimum of 56 and maximum of 76. Low also works at 92 FPS, but Medium offers a better visual balance while still clearing the threshold. High falls short at 55 FPS, so it is not recommended. At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is High, averaging 76 FPS. Medium averages 91 FPS and Low averages 127 FPS, but High provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a 76 FPS average. Ultra at 49 FPS fails the threshold. The optimal configuration for this system is therefore 1080p High or 1440p Medium, depending on whether the user prioritizes visual fidelity or resolution.