Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers exceptional performance in Undisputed, with every tested setting and resolution combination clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin. The data shows this combo is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while at 1080p the CPU becomes a more significant factor, though the overall frame rates remain extraordinarily high across the board.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination covers three resolutions (3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080) and four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra). All values represent average FPS, and no minimum or maximum FPS figures are available in the dataset.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the combo produces an average of 235.6 FPS on Low settings. Raising the preset to Medium drops performance to 169.1 FPS, a reduction of approximately 28%. High settings yield 137.4 FPS, and the most demanding Ultra preset still holds an average of 88.2 FPS. This means that even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains a substantial buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, keeping gameplay fluid.

Moving down to 2560x1440 (1440p), performance improves notably across all settings. The Low preset reaches an average of 366 FPS, while Medium produces 265 FPS. High settings deliver 218.7 FPS, and Ultra achieves 142 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is approximately 61%, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a significant load on the GPU, yet the absolute values remain far beyond what most displays can show.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the lowest resolution tested, the results are spectacular but also reveal a growing CPU involvement. Low settings average 506.1 FPS, Medium drops to 367.4 FPS, High produces 299.8 FPS, and Ultra still averages 192.5 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is a reduction of roughly 62%, which is nearly identical to the scaling seen at 1440p. However, the raw numbers at 1080p suggest that the RTX 5080 is capable of far more than the Core i5-13400F can feed it at the Low preset, indicating the CPU becomes a bottleneck in this scenario.

Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: each step up in settings costs a notable amount of average FPS. The data shows that the most significant drop occurs between Low and Medium, while the jump from High to Ultra is less severe relatively speaking. For instance, at 4K, the difference between Low and Medium is 66.5 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is 49.2 FPS.

---

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 60 FPS on Ultra at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes. The measured data shows an average FPS of 88.2 at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, which is clearly above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 506.1 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does the performance at 2560x1440 compare to 3840x2160?

A: At 1440p, the Ultra preset yields an average of 142.1 FPS, which is 53.9 FPS higher than the 88.2 FPS recorded at 4K Ultra. At the Low preset, the difference is 130.4 FPS, with the 1440p result being 366 FPS compared to 235.6 FPS at 4K.

Q: Is the Ultra preset at 1080p more demanding than the High preset at 1440p?

A: Yes, according to the data, the 1080p Ultra average is 192.5 FPS, while the 1440p High average is 218.7 FPS. This indicates that Ultra at 1080p is more demanding than High at 1440p for this game.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit the performance at 1080p Low?

A: The data suggests the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p Low, where the GPU produces an average of 506.1 FPS. This extremely high frame rate is more likely constrained by what the Core i5-13400F can deliver in scenarios, rather than the GPU rendering capacity.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded across all tested settings?

A: The lowest average FPS across the entire measured dataset is 88.2 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset.

---

Best Settings per Resolution

For players targeting a constant 60 FPS in Undisputed, every settings preset at every resolution meets the threshold. The best settings are simply the most demanding preset that remains above 60 FPS, which is the Ultra preset in all cases.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset provides an average FPS of 192.5. This leaves enormous headroom over the 60 FPS target. Since the data shows Ultra is the most demanding preset, it is the best choice for visual quality without sacrificing playability.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 142.1 FPS. Again, the system is never close to the 60 FPS threshold. The GPU is still delivering almost 2.4 times the required frame rate for smooth play at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 88.2 FPS. This is the closest the system comes to the 60 FPS threshold, but still maintains a 28.2 FPS margin. The data indicates that Ultra at 4K is entirely viable for this game.

---

The Verdict

This PC configuration can run Undisputed at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The verdictByResolution data confirms that all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160.

The best settings at each resolution are Ultra, with average FPS of 192.5 at 1080p, 142.1 at 1440p, and 88.2 at 4K. The system never falls below the 60 FPS threshold, even at the most demanding 4K Ultra preset.

The data shows a clear pattern: the combo is progressively more GPU-bound as resolution increases. At 1080p, the Ultra preset still delivers nearly double the frame rate of the 4K Ultra, indicating the GPU has enough throughput to handle the game at high frame rates. At 4K, the GPU's workload becomes more substantial, yet the Gen RTX 5080 has ample headroom.

For a player with a 144Hz monitor, the system at 1440p Ultra (142.1 FPS) practically matches the refresh rate limit. For 4K60 displays, the system excels with 88.2 FPS at Ultra. There is no scenario in this dataset where the system fails to meet the 60 FPS target.

---

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data for both the CPU and GPU provides insight into what other hardware would produce similar performance.

For the Intel Core i5-13400F, the closest rivals by average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 (0.3% slower), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (0.3% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (0.4% faster). This places the Core i5-13400F in a performance tier with these processors. Since the benchmark scores are essentially identical, any of these CPUs would likely produce the same FPS levels in Undisputed when paired with the same RTX 5080 GPU, particularly at 1080p where CPU influence is more pronounced.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8060S (0.6% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (0.7% slower), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (2.3% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (2.2% faster). These GPUs exhibit very similar overall benchmark scores. In Undisputed, the FPS differences would be small, likely within a few frames per second. The RX 9070 GRE, being slightly faster on average, might yield a marginally higher FPS in the GPU-bound 4K scenarios.

The data shows that the Core i5-13400F is the component with a larger spread among its rivals, but the CPU has less influence on this game. The GPU rival closest in performance is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, which is within 2.2% of the RTX 5080's score, suggesting it would produce nearly identical results at 4K.

---

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 200th out of 3718 tested combos in the database for Undisputed. This places it in the top 5.4% of all tested configurations.

Given this ranking, the combo sits in the upper echelon of performance. The fact that it clears 60 FPS at 4K Ultra is consistent with such a high rank, as many lower-ranked combos would struggle to reach that target. The data shows that the 200th rank indicates a system that is far ahead of the majority of setups, but not the absolute top-tier configurations that might push 4K Ultra beyond 100 FPS or 1080p Low past 600 FPS. The rank reflects a balanced high-end pairing, where the CPU and GPU and GPU are well-matched for high-refresh gaming.

Within the database, this ranking suggests that most other combinations (the other 3518 combos) will offer a lower average FPS in this game. The specific score for the game is not listed, but the rank is derived from the measured FPS results, which show consistently high averages across all settings.

---

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the CPU and GPU responsibilities shift across resolutions and presets.

At 1920x1080, the CPU's role is the most significant. The difference between the Low and Medium presets is 138.7 FPS (506.1 to 367.4), while the jump from High to Ultra is 107.3 FPS (299.8 to 192.5). This scaling suggests that the GPU is less stressed at this resolution, and the CPU's ability to handle game logic becomes a limiting factor. The fact that the 1080p Low average is 506.1 FPS, but the 1440p Low is 366 FPS, shows a 140 FPS drop when moving up one resolution, which is a bigger gap than what is seen at Ultra between the same resolutions (192.5 to 142.1, a 50.4 FPS drop). This indicates that the GPU is not fully saturated at 1080p Low, and the CPU is preventing it from reaching even higher frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take a more significant role. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is more consistent across the presets: at Low the drop is 140 FPS, at Medium it's 102.4 FPS, at High it's 81.1 FPS, and at Ultra it's 50.4 FPS. This pattern suggests that as the preset gets more demanding, the GPU workload increases, and the FPS drop becomes less severe because the GPU is already more fully loaded. The system is still GPU-bound at 1440p, but the CPU is not the strict bottleneck it was at Low 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear limiting factor. The differences between 1440p and 4K are smaller: at Low, the drop is 130.4 FPS (366.9 to 235.6), at Medium it's 95.9 FPS (265 to 169.1), at High it's 81.3 FPS (218.7 to 137.4), and at Ultra it's 53.9 FPS (142.1 to 88.2). The fact that the Ultra drop is 53.9 FPS, while the Low drop is 130.4 FPS, indicates that the higher presets are already so demanding that the GPU is the primary constraint, and the resolution change has a relatively smaller proportional impact. The CPU has less effect at 4K because the GPU takes much longer to render each frame.

In summary, the data shows that the RTX 5080 is the definitive bottleneck at 4K Ultra, while the Core i5-13400F is a more substantial factor at 1080p Low. At 1440p, the system is balanced, with the GPU scaling being the primary source of FPS variance between settings.