Undisputed

Best Settings per Resolution

The recorded data for Undisputed with the Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Arc B370 shows a clear progression in capability as resolution drops. The playable threshold is 60 frames per second, and the best settings are determined by the most demanding preset that still clears that bar.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The closest is Low, which averages 52 FPS. Medium averages 38 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 20 FPS. The verdict for this resolution is that no settings are playable, meaning the combination cannot sustain a 60 FPS experience at 4K regardless of quality level.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves. The Medium preset averages exactly 60 FPS, which meets the threshold. Low averages 83 FPS, High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 32 FPS. Since Medium is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, it is the best settings choice for this resolution. The playable settings list confirms both Low and Medium qualify, with Medium being the top option.

At 1920x1080, the combination is much more comfortable. The High preset averages 68 FPS, which clears the threshold with a small margin. Low averages 115 FPS, Medium averages 83 FPS, and Ultra averages 44 FPS. The best settings are High, as it is the most demanding preset that remains playable. The playable settings list includes High, Low, and Medium, with High as the best.

The pattern is consistent: the Arc B370 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, and the i5-13400F has enough headroom that the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The data suggests that 1080p High is the sweet spot, while 1440p Medium is the ceiling for a locked 60 FPS experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Intel Core i5-13400F and the Intel Arc B370 becomes visible when comparing FPS scaling across resolutions and presets. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and its benchmark percentiles place it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an integrated Arc B370 with a 5th percentile rank among all GPUs, which signals that the graphics solution is far weaker relative to its hardware class.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant constraint. Moving from Low to Medium reduces average FPS from 52 to 38, a drop of 14 FPS. Moving from Medium to High reduces it from 38 to 31, and High to Ultra drops it from 31 to 20. These steep falls at 4K indicate that the GPU's shading units, 1280 in total, and its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are overwhelmed by the pixel workload. The CPU's role at 4K is minimal, as the frame rate is dictated by the graphics pipeline.

At 2560x1440, the GPU still dominates, but the CPU begins to matter more. Low hits 83 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's frame delivery ceiling for this game, while Medium drops to 60 FPS and High falls to 49 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 23 FPS, and between Medium and High it is 11 FPS. This suggests that the GPU is still the main limiter, but the CPU is no longer idle; the i5-13400F's single-thread performance, measured at 960 in 3dmark single-thread and 3634 in Passmark single-thread, is sufficient to feed the GPU at lower settings.

At 1920x1080, the CPU's influence is more apparent. Low averages 115 FPS, which is a strong result and likely close to the CPU's practical limit in this title. Medium drops to 83 FPS, High to 68 FPS, and Ultra to 44 FPS. The scaling from Low to Medium is 32 FPS, and from Medium to High is 15 FPS. The fact that Low can reach 115 FPS while Ultra falls to 44 FPS shows that the GPU becomes the bottleneck as settings rise, but the CPU is capable of driving very high frame rates when the GPU is not stressed.

The data implies that for this game, the Arc B370 is the primary component to upgrade if the goal is higher resolutions or higher presets. The i5-13400F, with its 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 16 threads, has ample compute for Undisputed's simulation and physics at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU, however, is an integrated solution with system-shared memory, which explains its limited ability to handle 4K Ultra.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four presets each. All values are average FPS unless otherwise noted, with min and max provided only for Medium presets.

At 3840x2160, the results are as follows. Low averages 52 FPS. Medium averages 38 FPS, with a minimum of 32 and a maximum of 43. High averages 31 FPS. Ultra averages 20 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 32 FPS, and the Medium min-max range of 11 FPS indicates noticeable frame pacing variability at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the results improve substantially. Low averages 83 FPS. Medium averages 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 and a maximum of 69. High averages 49 FPS. Ultra averages 32 FPS. The Medium min-max range of 18 FPS shows that even at the playable threshold, there can be dips below 60, down to 51 FPS, which could be perceptible in fast-paced boxing exchanges.

At 1920x1080, the results are the strongest. Low averages 115 FPS. Medium averages 83 FPS, with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 95. High averages 68 FPS. Ultra averages 44 FPS. The Medium min-max range of 25 FPS is the widest recorded, but the minimum of 70 FPS still clears the playable threshold comfortably.

The absence of min and max data for Low, High, and Ultra means the database only provides average FPS for those presets, so frame stability cannot be fully assessed for them. The Medium data is the only complete set, and it shows that the 60 FPS average at 1440p comes with 51 FPS minimums, which is below the threshold. This is worth noting for players who are sensitive to frame drops.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-13400F provide context for CPU performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS has an average score of 25284, which is essentially identical to the i5-13400F's 25292, with a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362, which is 0.3 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365, also 0.3 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, which is 0.4 percent lower. These deltas are negligible, meaning any of these CPUs would behave nearly identically in Undisputed. The Ryzen 7 6800H and Ryzen 9 6900HS are mobile parts, but their benchmark scores align closely with the desktop i5-13400F, so the CPU contribution to frame rates would be similar.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Arc B370 are much older GPUs, which highlights the Arc B370's low standing. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Arc B370's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5 percent higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7 percent higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4 percent lower. These are legacy parts from a different era, so the comparison is not flattering. The data indicates that the Arc B370's performance class is roughly equivalent to these older cards, which explains why Undisputed struggles at higher resolutions.

For a player considering upgrades, the CPU is not the concern. The i5-13400F sits in a strong position relative to its rivals, and any of the listed alternatives would produce similar frame rates. The GPU is the weak link, and its nearest rivals suggest that even modest modern GPUs would be a significant step up, though the database does not provide direct measurements for such alternatives in this game.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Undisputed? The answer depends entirely on resolution and settings. The recorded verdict by resolution is clear.

At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The best average FPS is 52 on Low, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra are all below 40 FPS. This combination cannot run Undisputed at 4K with smooth performance.

At 2560x1440, the combination is playable on Low and Medium. The best settings are Medium, which averages exactly 60 FPS. Low averages 83 FPS and provides more headroom, but Medium is the most demanding playable preset. Players who want a safety margin against dips should consider Low, since Medium has a recorded minimum of 51 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the combination is playable on High, Low, and Medium. The best settings are High, which averages 68 FPS. Low averages 115 FPS and Medium averages 83 FPS. Ultra is not playable at 44 FPS. This is the resolution where the system is most comfortable, with High being the recommended target.

The overall verdict is that this PC can run Undisputed at 1080p High and 1440p Medium, but not at 4K. The i5-13400F is more than adequate for the game, while the Arc B370 is the reason for the 4K failure.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: High is the best playable preset at 1920x1080, averaging 68 FPS. Low and Medium also clear the threshold, but High is the most demanding of the three.

Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 4K?

A: No. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. Low averages 52 FPS, Medium averages 38 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 20 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings choice at 1440p?

A: Medium is the best playable preset at 2560x1440, averaging exactly 60 FPS. Low is also playable at 83 FPS, but Medium offers higher quality while meeting the threshold.

Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 test. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192, all within 0.7 percent.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this game?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. The Arc B370 ranks at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, while the i5-13400F ranks at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Frame rates drop sharply as settings increase, which points to the GPU as the limiter.

Q: What is the average FPS on Medium at 1080p?

A: Medium at 1920x1080 averages 83 FPS, with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 3429 out of 3718 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the lower portion of the database, around the 8th percentile of tested systems. The rank reflects the GPU's limitations more than the CPU's capabilities.

The i5-13400F is a strong processor, with a 77th percentile rank among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 25292. Its nearest rivals all score within 0.4 percent, confirming that CPU performance is not the weak link. The Arc B370, however, ranks at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184. This is the lowest component in the pairing.

The combination's low rank in Undisputed is consistent with the measured FPS data. The system can handle 1080p High and 1440p Medium, but it falls apart at 4K and cannot reach Ultra at any resolution. For players who prioritize high settings or high resolutions, this combo is not suitable. For players who accept 1080p High or 1440p Medium, it meets the 60 FPS threshold, but with little headroom at 1440p.

The ranking also implies that most other tested combos in the database deliver better performance in this game. The 289 combos below this one are likely paired with even weaker GPUs or CPUs, but the margin is thin. The data suggests that upgrading the GPU alone would move this system substantially higher in the rankings, while upgrading the CPU would yield little benefit for Undisputed specifically.