Undisputed

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded FPS data for Undisputed with the Intel Core i5-11400F and Intel Arc B370 spans three resolutions and four graphics presets. The most complete dataset comes from the Medium preset, which includes minimum and maximum frame rates at every resolution; the other presets only have average FPS values recorded.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are as follows. The Low preset delivers 52 FPS average. Medium drops to 38 FPS average, with a minimum of 32 FPS and a maximum of 43 FPS. High falls further to 31 FPS average. Ultra is the most demanding setting, producing only 20 FPS average. None of these meet the 60 FPS playable threshold, and even the best case, Low at 52 FPS, falls short by a notable margin. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 32 FPS, which indicates that the graphics settings have a substantial impact on performance when the resolution is very demanding.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the frame rates climb considerably. Low settings yield 83 FPS average. Medium achieves exactly 60 FPS average, with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS. High produces 49 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 32 FPS average. The Medium preset sits right at the playable threshold, making it the boundary case for this resolution. The spread from Low to Ultra is 51 FPS, showing that preset selection matters even more at 1440p than at 4K in absolute terms, though the relative scaling is similar.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system performs best. Low settings reach 115 FPS average. Medium delivers 83 FPS average, with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS. High produces 68 FPS average. Ultra, however, drops to 44 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The delta between Low and Ultra is 71 FPS, the largest spread across all resolutions. This indicates that at 1080p, the GPU has enough headroom to make preset selection a major lever, but the Ultra preset still overwhelms the hardware.

The only preset with recorded min and max values at all three resolutions is Medium. At 1080p Medium, the minimum of 70 FPS is above the 60 FPS threshold, meaning even dips stay playable. At 1440p Medium, the minimum of 51 FPS dips below the threshold, so while the average is exactly 60 FPS, there will be moments of sub-60 FPS gameplay. At 4K Medium, the minimum of 32 FPS is far below playable, confirming that 4K is not viable for this combination.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS average is the target. The data reveals a clear pattern.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS average. The highest average is 52 FPS on Low, which is 8 FPS short of the playable threshold. The verdict data confirms this: there are no playable settings at 4K. Users who insist on 4K must accept a sub-60 FPS experience, with Low being the least demanding option but still below target.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Medium, which achieves exactly 60 FPS average. The verdict data lists both Low and Medium as playable, with Medium being the best choice because it provides higher visual quality while still hitting the threshold. The minimum FPS of 51 indicates occasional dips below 60, but the average is sufficient. High and Ultra are not playable at this resolution, with High at 49 FPS and Ultra at 32 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is High, which delivers 68 FPS average. The verdict data lists High, Low, and Medium as playable, with High being the most demanding option that still clears the threshold. Low at 115 FPS and Medium at 83 FPS are also playable, but High offers the best visual fidelity among the playable options. Ultra at 44 FPS is not playable, so there is a clear ceiling below the maximum preset.

The pattern across resolutions is consistent: the system can handle Medium at 1440p and High at 1080p, but cannot manage Ultra at any resolution. At 4K, even Low fails to reach 60 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions and presets provides insight into which component limits performance in Undisputed. The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz and a 65 W TDP. The Intel Arc B370 is a low-power integrated-class GPU with a 25 W TDP, 1280 shading units, and 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The GPU sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the CPU sits in the 71st percentile. This stark difference suggests the GPU is the primary constraint.

The scaling between resolutions confirms this. From 1080p Low at 115 FPS to 4K Low at 52 FPS, the drop is 63 FPS, or roughly 55%. This is a massive reduction in performance as resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates would remain relatively flat across resolutions because the CPU workload does not scale as strongly with pixel count. The data shows the opposite: the GPU workload dominates.

Preset scaling within a single resolution also points to GPU limitation. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra drops FPS from 115 to 44, a reduction of 71 FPS or 62%. At 1440p, the drop from Low to Ultra is from 83 to 32 FPS, a 51 FPS reduction or 61%. At 4K, the drop is from 52 to 20 FPS, a 32 FPS reduction or 62%. The consistency of this relative drop across resolutions indicates that the graphics settings are taxing the GPU's fixed resources, not the CPU.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent when considering the minimum frame rates. At 1440p Medium, the average is 60 FPS but the minimum is 51 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the average is 83 FPS and the minimum is 70 FPS. These dips below average are likely caused by CPU-driven frame pacing or physics computations, but the CPU has enough headroom that it does not become the dominant bottleneck. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14340 and single-core score of 2024 indicate a capable processor for gaming, and its 3DMark single-thread score of 868 supports this.

At 4K, the GPU is so severely limited that the CPU's performance is irrelevant. Even at Low settings, the GPU cannot reach 60 FPS, and the 52 FPS average at 4K Low is likely a hard GPU limit. The CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution in this dataset; the GPU is the clear bottleneck, and this becomes more pronounced as resolution increases.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly. For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-11400F has an average benchmark score of 17177. Its nearest rivals are:

• AMD EPYC 7H12 with an average score of 17120, a delta of 0.3% (the i5-11400F is 0.3% faster)
• Intel Core i5-12450H with an average score of 17239, a delta of -0.4% (the i5-11400F is 0.4% slower)
• AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G with an average score of 17278, a delta of -0.6% (the i5-11400F is 0.6% slower)
• Intel Core Ultra 7 164U with an average score of 17074, a delta of 0.6% (the i5-11400F is 0.6% faster)

All four rivals are within 0.6% of the i5-11400F's average score, meaning they would deliver virtually identical CPU performance in Undisputed. The AMD EPYC 7H12 is a data-center part, but its score is close enough that CPU-bound scenarios would show no meaningful difference. The Core i5-12450H is a mobile chip, yet its score is nearly identical, suggesting that CPU performance is not a differentiator in this game.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184. Its nearest rivals are:

• ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 with an average score of 1186, a delta of -0.2% (the Arc B370 is 0.2% slower)
• ATI Radeon HD 5770 with an average score of 1190, a delta of -0.5% (the Arc B370 is 0.5% slower)
• AMD Radeon HD 7650M with an average score of 1192, a delta of -0.7% (the Arc B370 is 0.7% slower)
• AMD FirePro M2000 with an average score of 1168, a delta of 1.4% (the Arc B370 is 1.4% faster)

These rivals are all much older GPUs, and their scores are within 1.4% of the Arc B370. In practice, this means that any of these GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Undisputed. The ATI Radeon HD 5770, for instance, is a desktop part from a previous generation, yet its benchmark score is only 0.5% higher than the Arc B370. Users with any of these GPUs would see the same playable settings and the same resolution limits. The GPU is the limiting factor, so swapping among these rivals would not change the verdict.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Undisputed? The answer depends entirely on resolution and settings. The verdict data is clear.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot run the game at a playable frame rate. There are no playable settings, and the best average FPS is 52 on Low. The verdict states that the playable settings list is empty, and the best settings value is null. Users at 4K must accept a sub-60 FPS experience, which is not recommended for a sports title that benefits from smooth motion.

At 2560x1440, the system can run the game. The playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best choice. Medium achieves exactly 60 FPS average, which meets the playable threshold. The minimum FPS of 51 indicates some dips, but the overall experience is acceptable. High at 49 FPS and Ultra at 32 FPS are not playable.

At 1920x1080, the system runs the game well. The playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best choice. High achieves 68 FPS average, which is 8 FPS above the threshold. Low at 115 FPS and Medium at 83 FPS are also playable, offering smoother experiences if lower visual fidelity is acceptable. Ultra at 44 FPS is not playable.

The summary: this combination clears 60 FPS at 1080p High and 1440p Medium. It does not clear 60 FPS at 4K at any setting, nor at 1080p Ultra or 1440p High. For a 1080p monitor, this is a capable setup. For 1440p, the user must stick to Medium. For 4K, this hardware is insufficient.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest playable preset at 1920x1080?

A: High settings, which deliver 68 FPS average. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at this resolution.

Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 2560x1440?

A: Yes, but only on Low or Medium settings. Medium achieves exactly 60 FPS average, while High drops to 49 FPS and Ultra to 32 FPS.

Q: What is the average FPS at 3840x2160 on Low settings?

A: 52 FPS. This is the highest average FPS at 4K, but it still falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-11400F or the Intel Arc B370 the bottleneck?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 71st percentile. FPS drops by roughly 60% from Low to Ultra at every resolution, indicating GPU limitation.

Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2% faster, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% faster, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% faster, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% slower. All are within 1.4% of the Arc B370's score.

Q: What is the minimum FPS at 1440p Medium?

A: 51 FPS. The average is 60 FPS, but the minimum dips below the threshold, so there will be occasional frame drops.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core i5-11400F and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3429 out of 3718 combinations for Undisputed. This places it in the lower portion of the ranking, at roughly the 8th percentile. The rank reflects the GPU's severe limitation: the Arc B370 is in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, which drags the overall combination down despite the CPU being in the 71st percentile.

The rank of 3429 out of 3718 means there are 289 combinations that perform worse in this game. Most modern gaming systems will outperform this pairing. The rank is consistent with the measured FPS data: the system can handle 1080p High and 1440p Medium, but it cannot reach 4K or the highest presets at lower resolutions. For a sports game like Undisputed, which benefits from consistent frame rates, this combination is adequate for 1080p and acceptable for 1440p with reduced settings, but it is not a high-performance setup. The data indicates that users seeking higher presets or 4K playability would need a substantially more powerful GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to support better graphics hardware.