Undisputed

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combination of Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Undisputed shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets. All figures represent average FPS, as minimum and maximum frame time data was not captured in the database.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 274.8 FPS on Low, 192.7 FPS on Medium, 160.1 FPS on High, and 104.6 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is substantial: Ultra runs at roughly 62% of the Low preset's frame rate. The step from Medium to High costs about 32.6 FPS, while the step from High to Ultra costs another 55.5 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset places notably heavier demands on the GPU.

Moving to 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with lower headroom. Low produces 196.9 FPS, Medium 143.1 FPS, High 119.8 FPS, and Ultra 78.1 FPS. The relative drop from 1080p to 1440p is largest at Ultra, where the frame rate falls by 26.5 FPS, while Low only loses 77.9 FPS. This suggests that the Ultra preset at 1440p is beginning to approach the practical limits of the RTX 4060.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes significantly. Low still manages 126.2 FPS, Medium drops to 90.0 FPS, High falls to 76.6 FPS, and Ultra plunges to 47.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to clear 60 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep: High loses 43.2 FPS, Medium loses 53.1 FPS, and Low loses 70.7 FPS. Ultra loses 30.5 FPS, which is proportionally smaller but still pushes it below the playable threshold.

The data indicates that the RTX 4060 has ample headroom at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K Ultra is the single scenario where the hardware cannot sustain a smooth experience. All other tested settings at all resolutions remain well above 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations for Undisputed, this pairing of Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 1984th out of 3718 combos. That places it in the upper-middle tier, meaning roughly 53% of tested systems perform better and 47% perform worse. The rank is based on aggregate measured performance across all resolutions and presets, so it reflects the combo's overall capability rather than any single setting.

The CPU's individual percentile of 68 among all processors indicates that the i5-10400F outperforms about two-thirds of CPUs in general benchmark workloads. The GPU's percentile of 61 among all GPUs is slightly lower, suggesting the RTX 4060 is a more mid-pack performer relative to the full GPU landscape. The combo's in-game rank of 1984 out of 3718 is therefore consistent with both components sitting near the middle of their respective distributions, with the CPU being the stronger relative component.

In practical terms, this rank implies that the combo is neither a top-tier enthusiast setup nor a low-end entry-level one. It sits comfortably in the range where most modern games can run at high settings at mainstream resolutions, which the measured FPS data confirms.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Undisputed at 4K?

A: Yes, at High settings it averages 76.6 FPS, and at Medium it averages 90.0 FPS. However, at Ultra settings it drops to 47.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: The Ultra preset is playable, averaging 78.1 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that still clears 60 FPS at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14185. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6756E, scores 14163 (0.2% lower), while the AMD EPYC 7552 scores 14115 (0.5% lower). The Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14277 (0.6% higher). The differences are negligible.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (0.7% lower). All are within 1% of each other.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 sufficient for 1080p gaming in this title?

A: Yes, all four presets at 1920x1080 exceed 100 FPS. The lowest recorded value is 104.6 FPS at Ultra, which is far above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Which resolution offers the highest frame rate headroom?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches 274.8 FPS, the highest value in the entire dataset. Even at Ultra, 1080p delivers 104.6 FPS, which is higher than any 1440p or 4K preset.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded measurements, this PC can run Undisputed successfully at all tested resolutions, with one exception. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset fails to meet the 60 FPS playable threshold, averaging only 47.6 FPS. All other configurations clear 60 FPS with significant margin.

For 1920x1080, the verdict is unequivocal: every preset is playable, and Ultra is the recommended best setting at 104.6 FPS. For 2560x1440, the same applies, with Ultra averaging 78.1 FPS and remaining comfortably above the threshold. For 3840x2160, High settings are the best playable option at 76.6 FPS, while Ultra is not recommended.

The data shows that users with a 1080p or 1440p display can max out the game's settings without concern. At 4K, users should stick to High or lower to maintain smooth performance. The RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are evidently sufficient for this title at all but the most demanding configuration.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest CPU rivals to the Intel Core i5-10400F, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon 6756E (0.2% lower score), the Intel Core 7 160UL (0.3% higher), the AMD EPYC 7552 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (0.6% higher). All of these processors would deliver virtually identical performance in CPU-bound scenarios, though their architectures and platform requirements differ. The Ryzen 3 7320C is notably a low-power mobile part, while the Xeon and EPYC are server chips, so real-world gaming performance may vary beyond the synthetic benchmark scores.

On the GPU side, the nearest rivals to the RTX 4060 include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.2% higher score), the AMD Radeon 780M (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (0.7% lower). The HD 7790 is a much older discrete card, while the 780M is an integrated GPU, and the Radeon Pro cards are workstation-oriented. None of these are direct modern gaming equivalents, but their benchmark proximity suggests they would produce similar frame rates in Undisputed. However, the RTX 4060's feature set, including modern API support and ray tracing capabilities, is not reflected in these raw score comparisons.

In practice, the database indicates that swapping the i5-10400F for any of its listed rivals would change overall performance by less than 1%. The same applies to swapping the RTX 4060 for its listed rivals. The combination's rank is therefore highly stable against minor hardware substitutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 104.6 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and it delivers nearly double the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best playable setting, averaging 78.1 FPS. This provides a 30.1% margin above the 60 FPS threshold, leaving some headroom for scene complexity fluctuations.

At 3840x2160, the best playable preset is High, averaging 76.6 FPS. Medium runs at 90.0 FPS and Low at 126.2 FPS, but High offers the highest visual quality while still clearing 60 FPS. Ultra is not playable at this resolution.

The pattern is consistent: at 1080p and 1440p, users can enable maximum settings; at 4K, they must drop one step from Ultra to High.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high across all presets, ranging from 104.6 to 274.8 FPS. The i5-10400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, appears to be the limiting factor at the highest settings, as the GPU is likely not fully saturated at such high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 688 in 3DMark and Cinebench R15 single-core score of 146 indicate modest per-core performance, which could constrain frame generation in less GPU-bound scenarios.

At 2560x1440, the GPU load increases, as evidenced by the larger frame rate drops compared to 1080p. The RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth become more relevant, yet the frame rates remain high enough that the CPU still plays a significant role. The 78.1 FPS at Ultra suggests both components are working in balance, with neither fully bottlenecking the other.

At 3840x2160, the GPU clearly dominates the performance profile. The frame rate differences between presets become more pronounced, and the Ultra preset's failure to reach 60 FPS at 47.6 FPS points to the RTX 4060's memory bandwidth and 8 GB capacity being insufficient for the highest quality 4K rendering in this game. The CPU's role diminishes at 4K, as the GPU is the primary constraint across all settings.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K at Ultra shows a 54.5% reduction in frame rate (104.6 to 47.6 FPS), while at Low the reduction is also substantial (274.8 to 126.2 FPS). This indicates that both resolution and preset level independently stress the GPU, while the CPU's contribution is largely constant across resolutions. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p, the CPU matters more; for 4K, the GPU is the deciding factor.