Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Undisputed
Sports 2023

Undisputed

59%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
221 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
85 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
160 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
61 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
101 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
7.6ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,549
Your CPU 14,185
Graphics Card
Required 27,247
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 60 73 101
1440p QHD 61 95 115 160
1080p Full HD 85 132 159 221

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 132
1920x1080 Low 221
1920x1080 Medium 159
1920x1080 Ultra 85
2560x1440 High 95
2560x1440 Low 160
2560x1440 Medium 115
2560x1440 Ultra 61
3840x2160 High 60
3840x2160 Low 101
3840x2160 Medium 73
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Undisputed on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

Undisputed is a demanding sports title, and the recorded data for the Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 shows a clear performance curve across resolutions. The database includes measurements at four settings tiers (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) for three resolutions, though only the Medium preset captures complete min and max frame data.

At 1920x1080, this combo is exceptionally fast. The Low preset produces an average of 221 FPS. Medium averages 159 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 135 FPS and a maximum of 183 FPS. High drops to 132 FPS on average. Ultra is still very playable at 85 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra is substantial, a 136 FPS spread, but even the most demanding preset remains far above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably. Low averages 160 FPS. Medium averages 115 FPS, with a minimum of 98 FPS and a maximum of 132 FPS. High delivers 95 FPS. Ultra, the most demanding preset, still clears the playable bar with an average of 61 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra here is 99 FPS, showing that the GPU headroom at this resolution is narrower but still sufficient.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes. Low averages 101 FPS, which is strong for 4K. Medium averages 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS. High manages exactly 60 FPS on average. Ultra falls below the playable threshold, averaging only 39 FPS. The resolution scaling from 1080p to 4K costs roughly half the frame rate at Low, and the Ultra preset becomes the first setting that fails to hold 60 FPS.

The Medium preset is the only setting with full min/max data. At 1080p, the minimum of 135 FPS indicates consistent frame delivery. At 1440p, the minimum of 98 FPS still offers a comfortable buffer. At 4K, the minimum of 62 FPS sits just above the 60 FPS line, suggesting that even momentary dips do not cross into stutter territory.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database defines playability as maintaining an average of at least 60 FPS. Using that criterion, each resolution has a clear best setting.

At 1920x1080, every preset is playable, and the most demanding one, Ultra, runs at 85 FPS average. That is the best setting for this resolution, as it delivers the highest visual quality while keeping a 25 FPS margin above the threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best setting, averaging 61 FPS. This is a narrow margin, only 1 FPS above the threshold, but the recorded data confirms it. High and Medium also qualify, at 95 and 115 FPS respectively, but Ultra offers the maximum fidelity the hardware can support at 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the best setting is High, which averages exactly 60 FPS. Medium averages 73 FPS and Low averages 101 FPS, but High is the most demanding preset that stays at or above the playable line. Ultra at 39 FPS fails to qualify, so 4K users should cap their expectations at High.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database, this specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 2794 out of 3718 tested combos for Undisputed. That places it in the lower-middle portion of the field, which is informative given the strong 1080p and 1440p results. The rank reflects the full pool of tested hardware, including far more powerful pairings, so the percentile position does not contradict the measured playability.

The combo's percentile versus all CPUs is 68, and its percentile versus all GPUs is also 68. These figures indicate that the i5-10400F and Arc B580 each sit above the median in their respective categories. The game's ranking, however, is influenced by how the two components interact under load, and the 4K Ultra result pulls the overall standing down.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-10400F, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon 6756E with a delta of 0.2%, the Intel Core 7 160UL at -0.3%, the AMD EPYC 7552 at 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C at -0.6%. These processors have very close average scores, meaning any of them would likely produce similar CPU-bound behavior in Undisputed. The delta percentages are all under 1%, so the performance difference in practice would be negligible.

For the Intel Arc B580, the nearest GPU rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at -0.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 0.6%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at -0.7%, and the NVIDIA P106-100 at -1%. The RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 names are notable, as they suggest the Arc B580 lands in a performance class that includes older high-end cards. The RX 580 2048SP comparison indicates that even an older mid-range GPU can behave similarly in aggregate benchmarks, though game-specific results may vary.

The implication for Undisputed is that swapping the i5-10400F for any of those CPUs, or swapping the Arc B580 for any of those GPUs, would yield within a few percent of the same average score. The recorded frame rates in this game would likely remain close, especially at 1080p and 1440p where the GPU is the primary driver.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals which component matters more at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are high across all presets, with Low hitting 221 FPS and Ultra hitting 85 FPS. The wide spread between presets indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor, since lowering settings produces large gains. The i5-10400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, has enough headroom to feed the Arc B580 at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the pattern continues. Low averages 160 FPS and Ultra averages 61 FPS. The GPU still dominates the performance curve, but the narrower gap between presets, 99 FPS versus 136 FPS at 1080p, suggests the CPU begins to play a larger role. The Ultra result of 61 FPS is close to the threshold, indicating that the GPU is nearing its limit while the CPU still has capacity.

At 3840x2160, the CPU's role diminishes further. Low averages 101 FPS, Medium 73 FPS, and High 60 FPS. The GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as the resolution increase places heavy demand on the Arc B580's 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and its 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS confirms that the GPU cannot handle the highest settings at this resolution, regardless of CPU headroom.

The scaling between resolutions is revealing. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 61 FPS (221 to 160), and from 1440p to 4K it is 59 FPS (160 to 101). These drops are nearly linear, which points to GPU-bound performance. At Ultra settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 24 FPS (85 to 61), and from 1440p to 4K it is 22 FPS (61 to 39). The smaller absolute drops at higher settings suggest that the CPU's influence grows as the GPU becomes less saturated, but the overall trend still favors the GPU as the primary bottleneck.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Undisputed? The verdict by resolution is clear.

At 1920x1080, yes, and with room to spare. All four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 85 FPS. This is the resolution where the combo is most comfortable, offering smooth gameplay even at maximum settings.

At 2560x1440, yes. Ultra averages 61 FPS, which is just above the threshold. High and Medium are safer choices, at 95 and 115 FPS respectively, but the data confirms that Ultra is playable.

At 3840x2160, conditionally. High averages exactly 60 FPS, making it the most demanding playable preset. Medium and Low also qualify, at 73 and 101 FPS. Ultra at 39 FPS is not playable by the 60 FPS standard.

The overall assessment is that this PC is a strong 1080p and 1440p machine for Undisputed, with 4K limited to High settings or lower. The 4K Medium minimum of 62 FPS provides a small buffer, but the 4K High average of exactly 60 FPS leaves no headroom for demanding scenes.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest setting that maintains 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: Ultra, with an average of 85 FPS.

Q: Can this PC run Undisputed at 2560x1440 on Ultra?

A: Yes, the average is 61 FPS, just above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 3840x2160?

A: High, which averages exactly 60 FPS. Ultra is not playable at 39 FPS.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1920x1080?

A: Low averages 221 FPS, which is 136 FPS faster than Ultra's 85 FPS.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B580 outperform or underperform the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?

A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score is 23021, while the RTX 2080's is 22895, a delta of 0.6% in favor of the Arc B580.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 3840x2160 on Medium settings?

A: 62 FPS, with a maximum of 84 FPS and an average of 73 FPS.