Undisputed

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the highest preset that maintains an average at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers 68 FPS on average. Low reaches 115 FPS and Medium sits at 83 FPS, so all three presets clear the playability threshold, but High is the most demanding option that still qualifies.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, with an average of exactly 60 FPS. Low runs at 83 FPS, which is also above the threshold, but Medium offers the highest visual quality among the playable options. High falls to 49 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS target.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The closest result is Low at 52 FPS, followed by Medium at 38 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 20 FPS. The database verdict lists no playable settings for this resolution, meaning the hardware cannot sustain a smooth experience at 4K regardless of the quality level chosen.

The pattern is clear: the system is fully capable at 1080p with headroom to spare, borderline at 1440p on Medium, and not viable at 4K. The 60 FPS threshold is the reference point used throughout the database, and the measured averages show exactly where this combo crosses that line.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded data shows that resolution scaling has a strong effect on frame rates, which points to the GPU as the primary constraint in this pairing. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings drops the average from 68 FPS to 49 FPS, a reduction of roughly 28%. The same resolution jump at Low settings goes from 115 FPS to 83 FPS, about a 28% decline as well. At Medium, the drop is from 83 FPS to 60 FPS, approximately 28% lower again. These consistent percentage declines across all three presets indicate that the graphics card is being pushed harder as pixel count rises, while the CPU load does not scale in the same way.

The step from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 reinforces this interpretation. High settings fall from 49 FPS to 31 FPS, a 37% loss. Medium drops from 60 FPS to 38 FPS, about 37% lower. Low goes from 83 FPS to 52 FPS, roughly 37% down. The percentage loss grows as resolution increases, which is typical of a GPU-bound scenario: the rendering workload at 4K is substantially heavier, and the Arc B370 cannot keep pace.

Preset scaling within a single resolution also points to GPU dominance. At 1920x1080, Low runs at 115 FPS while Ultra runs at 44 FPS, a 62% reduction. At 2560x1440, Low is 83 FPS and Ultra is 32 FPS, a 61% drop. At 3840x2160, Low is 52 FPS and Ultra is 20 FPS, a 62% decline. The near-identical percentage gaps across all three resolutions suggest that the visual quality settings are taxing the graphics hardware in a predictable, linear fashion, with no sudden CPU bottleneck emerging at lower resolutions.

The Intel Core i3-12100F has a multi-threaded PassMark score of 14015 and a single-thread score of 3444, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11860. These are modest but respectable numbers, and the benchmark results do not show any sign of the CPU capping performance. If the processor were the limiting factor, the frame rate differences between Low and Ultra at a given resolution would be smaller, since the CPU would struggle to feed the GPU regardless of quality settings. Instead, the data shows wide gaps between presets, which is the signature of a GPU-limited system.

At 1440p Medium, the system lands at exactly 60 FPS, the threshold used by the database. This is the point where the GPU is working at its limit while the CPU still has headroom. At 1080p, the CPU likely has even more spare capacity, as frame rates climb to 115 FPS on Low without any apparent ceiling. The conclusion from the measurements is straightforward: the Arc B370 is the deciding factor in this build, and the Core i3-12100F is adequate to support it across all tested settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the database records the following averages: Low runs at 115 FPS, Medium at 83 FPS with a range of 70 to 95 FPS, High at 68 FPS, and Ultra at 44 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 71 FPS, which is substantial. The Medium preset shows a 25 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, indicating some variability, but the average remains well above the playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 83 FPS, Medium averages 60 FPS with a range of 51 to 69 FPS, High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 32 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one that includes recorded minimum and maximum values, and its average sits exactly at the 60 FPS threshold. The spread of 18 FPS between min and max is narrower than at 1080p, which suggests the system is more consistent when the GPU is closer to its limit.

At 3840x2160, Low averages 52 FPS, Medium averages 38 FPS with a range of 32 to 43 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 20 FPS. No preset reaches the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset again has the only recorded min and max values, with an 11 FPS spread. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep: Low loses 31 FPS, Medium loses 22 FPS, High loses 18 FPS, and Ultra loses 12 FPS. The absolute losses shrink as the preset gets heavier, but the percentage losses grow, which is consistent with a GPU that is increasingly overwhelmed at higher resolutions.

The data also shows that the Ultra preset is consistently far below the threshold at every resolution. At 1080p, Ultra is 44 FPS, at 1440p it is 32 FPS, and at 4K it is 20 FPS. Even at the lowest resolution, the Ultra preset cannot hold 60 FPS, so it should be avoided entirely with this hardware. High at 1080p is the most demanding playable configuration in the entire dataset.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in the database are based on average benchmark scores. The Intel Core 3 N355 has an average score of 13492, which is essentially identical to the Core i3-12100F at 13494, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core i5-9500 scores 13452, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13594, 0.7% higher. The Intel Core i7-1250U scores 13351, 1.1% lower. Any of these processors would behave very similarly to the Core i3-12100F in this game, since their aggregate performance is within about one percent.

The percentile ranking for the CPU is 68, meaning it sits above the majority of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 13494 places it among mid-range desktop and mobile parts. For a game like Undisputed, which the data shows is GPU-bound in this configuration, swapping the processor for any of these near-equivalents would likely produce nearly identical frame rates.

For the GPU, the situation is different. The Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184, and its nearest rivals are all much older parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, 1.4% lower. These deltas are small, but the names indicate that the Arc B370 is competing with hardware from a different era. The GPU percentile is 5, which places it in the bottom 5% of all GPUs in the database. This is the component that drags the overall combo ranking down, and any upgrade to a stronger graphics card would have a far larger impact on Undisputed than a CPU swap.

The practical implication is that the CPU choice is flexible within this performance band, while the GPU is the hard limit. Players with any of the listed rival CPUs would see essentially the same FPS in this game, provided the Arc B370 remains the graphics solution. Conversely, pairing the Core i3-12100F with a stronger GPU would unlock higher presets and resolutions, since the processor has demonstrated it can keep up with the current graphics card.

The Verdict

The database verdict for this combo is clear. At 1920x1080, the system can run Undisputed at High settings with an average of 68 FPS, and it also clears 60 FPS on Low and Medium. This is the recommended resolution for this hardware, as it offers the best balance of visual quality and smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the system is playable on Low and Medium, with Medium being the best playable setting at exactly 60 FPS. High drops to 49 FPS, which is below the threshold. Players who want 1440p should stick to Medium or lower to maintain fluid motion.

At 3840x2160, the system is not playable at any setting. The closest option is Low at 52 FPS, which still misses the 60 FPS target by a noticeable margin. The verdict list includes no playable settings for 4K, so this resolution is off the table for this combo.

The overall conclusion is that this PC can run Undisputed, but only up to 1440p Medium. At 1080p, it has plenty of performance and can even handle High settings comfortably. The Ultra preset is not viable at any resolution, as it falls below 60 FPS even at 1080p. The Arc B370 is the limiting factor, and the Core i3-12100F is not the bottleneck in any measured scenario.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that runs at or above 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: High settings, which average 68 FPS at 1080p.

Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 2560x1440?

A: Yes, on Low or Medium settings. Medium averages exactly 60 FPS, while Low averages 83 FPS. High and Ultra fall below the threshold.

Q: Is this PC capable of 4K gaming in Undisputed?

A: No. The best result at 3840x2160 is Low at 52 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. No settings are listed as playable at this resolution.

Q: Which component limits performance in this game?

A: The GPU. Frame rate drops by roughly 28% when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and by about 37% from 1440p to 4K, while preset scaling also shows wide gaps. The CPU has sufficient headroom.

Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at 1920x1080?

A: Ultra averages 44 FPS at 1080p, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra is not playable at any resolution in the measured data.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems for Undisputed?

A: The combo ranks 3429 out of 3718 tested combinations, placing it in the lower portion of the database.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the Intel Arc B370 ranks 3429 out of 3718 tested combos for Undisputed. That places this build in the bottom 8% of all systems in the database for this game. The rank reflects the GPU's position more than the CPU's, since the Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, while the Core i3-12100F sits at the 68th percentile among all CPUs.

The practical result of this ranking is visible in the frame rate data. The system handles 1080p well, with three presets above 60 FPS, and it can manage 1440p on Medium. But it falls short at 4K entirely, and the Ultra preset is never playable. The low GPU percentile explains why: the Arc B370 is in the same performance neighborhood as integrated and legacy discrete graphics parts from over a decade ago, based on the nearest rival scores.

The CPU rank tells a different story. At the 68th percentile, the Core i3-12100F is a competent mid-range processor, and its nearest rivals are all within one percent of its average score. This means the CPU is not the reason for the low combo ranking. If the same processor were paired with a stronger GPU, the combo rank for Undisputed would improve substantially, since the frame rate data shows the system is GPU-bound across all resolutions and presets.

The takeaway from the ranking is that this combo is positioned for 1080p gaming, with modest 1440p capability on reduced settings. It is not a high-end system, and the database rank reflects that. Players using this hardware should target 1080p High for the best experience, or 1440p Medium if they prefer the higher resolution and can accept exactly 60 FPS on average. For 4K, the hardware is simply not sufficient, and the measured data offers no playable settings at that resolution.