Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a solid, if not spectacular, showing in Undisputed, with benchmark data indicating that 1080p and 1440p gaming are its primary strengths. The measured performance across all resolutions and presets shows a clear pattern: this pairing is capable of smooth frame rates at high settings for most users, but 4K gaming demands compromises. The data indicates a playable experience at 1080p Ultra and 1440p High, while 4K users will need to stick to Medium settings to maintain the 60 FPS threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 75 FPS. This means users can max out the game’s visual options without sacrificing smoothness, making it the ideal choice for full HD displays. The gap between Ultra and the next step down, High, is significant, with Ultra delivering 75 FPS versus 116 FPS on High, but both are well above the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, producing an average of 84 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this resolution, as it balances visual fidelity with performance headroom. The data shows that Ultra at 1440p drops to 54 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable line, so High is the recommended maximum. Medium runs at 102 FPS, offering a higher safety margin for demanding scenes, but High remains the best choice for image quality without hitting performance walls.

For 3840x2160, the highest setting that clears 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 64 FPS. This is a tight margin, and users should be aware that the minimum FPS recorded at this setting is 55, which could dip below the threshold in intense moments. Low runs at 89 FPS, providing a more comfortable buffer for 4K, while High and Ultra fall short at 53 FPS and 34 FPS, respectively.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Undisputed at 4K with high settings?*

A: No. At 3840x2160, the High preset averages 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best 4K option is Medium, which averages 64 FPS.

Q: What is the maximum frame rate achievable at 1920x1080?

A: The highest average FPS recorded at 1080p is 195 on the Low preset. For a more visually rich experience, the Ultra preset still delivers a strong 75 FPS average.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 2560x1440?

A: No. At 1440p, the Ultra preset averages 54 FPS, failing to meet the 60 FPS playable standard. High is the best playable setting, averaging 84 FPS.

Q: How much of a performance drop occurs when moving from 1080p to 4K on the Medium preset?

A: The Medium preset drops from 141 FPS at 1920x1080 to 64 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a substantial decrease, highlighting the resolution’s heavy demand on the GPU.

*Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo in Undisputed?*

A: The lowest average is 34 FPS, observed at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset. This is the only configuration where the average dips below 40 FPS.

Q: Are there any settings where the minimum FPS is a concern?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 55, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold even though the average is 64. This suggests potential stutter in heavy scenes.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The data for 1920x1080 shows a wide spread across presets. The Low preset leads with an average of 195 FPS. Medium follows at 141 FPS, with a minimum of 120 and a maximum of 162. High drops to 116 FPS, and Ultra settles at 75 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a clear scaling curve, with each step up in quality costing a significant number of frames.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 141 FPS. Medium delivers 102 FPS, with a documented range of 86 to 117 FPS. High runs at 84 FPS, while Ultra falls to 54 FPS. The performance gap between Medium and High is smaller here than at 1080p, suggesting a growing GPU bottleneck at higher resolutions.

The 3840x2160 results show the most constrained performance. Low averages 89 FPS. Medium averages 64 FPS, with a minimum of 55 and a maximum of 74. High drops to 53 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 34 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium is a 25 FPS loss, and from Medium to High it’s an 11 FPS loss, indicating diminishing returns as settings increase.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Undisputed, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2986 out of 3718 tested combos. This places it in the lower half of all configurations, which is notable given the individual component scores. The CPU sits in the 87th percentile against all processors, while the GPU is in the 65th percentile against all graphics cards.

The rank suggests that while the CPU is a strong performer, the overall gaming experience is likely held back by the GPU’s capabilities in this specific title. The data shows that the combo is far from the top of the leaderboard, but it also indicates that the hardware can still handle the game at playable settings on most resolutions, as long as expectations are adjusted for 4K.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 7700’s nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the closest match, with an average benchmark score of 40048 versus the 7700’s 40081, a tiny delta of 0.1%. The Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144, which is 0.2% higher. Also nearby is the AMD Ryzen 9 270 at 40246 (0.4% higher) and the Intel Core i9-13905H at 40313 (0.6% higher). These CPUs would behave almost identically in Undisputed, meaning any performance differences would be negligible.

For the Intel Arc B570, the nearest comparable GPU is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which has an average score of 20534 versus the B570’s 20556, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Arc A750 is also close, scoring 20582, which is 0.1% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X are within a 0.4% to 0.5% range, though these are older parts. Swapping the B570 for any of these would yield a nearly identical frame rate profile in the game.

The Verdict

This PC can run Undisputed at playable frame rates for the majority of configurations. For 1920x1080, the verdict is clear: every preset, including Ultra, clears the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 75 FPS at the highest settings. This makes it fully capable of a maxed-out experience at full HD.

At 2560x1440, the system is also successful, with High settings delivering 84 FPS. The only caveat is that Ultra is not playable, averaging 54 FPS, so users must step down one notch. For 3840x2160, the situation is more restrictive, but still playable: Medium settings average 64 FPS, though the minimum FPS of 55 is a risk. Low is the safer choice at 89 FPS, but it sacrifices visual quality.

Ultimately, the data indicates this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The 60 FPS playable threshold is met with ease at these resolutions, while 4K requires a choice between Medium settings with occasional dips or Low settings for a more stable experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in component responsibility as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more significant role, as evidenced by the high frame rates across all presets. The jump from Low to Ultra costs 120 FPS (from 195 to 75), which suggests the CPU is feeding frames quickly enough to expose the GPU’s limits at lower settings. The Ryzen 7 7700’s strong multi-threaded performance (18760 in Cinebench R23 multicore) keeps the system from bottlenecking at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a larger burden. The frame rate drop from 1080p is consistent across presets, with the average falling by roughly 54 FPS on Low (195 to 141) and 9 FPS on Ultra (75 to 54). This pattern indicates that the GPU’s rendering load is increasing, and the CPU’s advantage becomes less pronounced.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant factor. The performance plummet at 4K, especially on Ultra where the average is 34 FPS, shows that the Intel Arc B570’s 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the limiting constraints. The CPU’s role diminishes further, as even the Low preset at 4K (89 FPS) cannot match the 1080p Low result (195 FPS), proving that the resolution scaling is entirely dependent on the GPU’s pixel throughput and fill rate. The data shows that users looking to improve 4K performance would need to focus on the GPU, while those at 1080p might see minor gains from a stronger CPU.