Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a solid, playable experience in Undisputed, with the data showing that 60 FPS is achievable at every tested resolution, provided settings are chosen wisely. The pairing is particularly strong at 1440p and 1080p, where the most demanding preset clears the threshold, while 4K requires a slight compromise from Ultra settings to maintain smooth performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo in Undisputed reveal a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally capable. The Low preset produces an average of 221 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this configuration. Moving to Medium, the average remains very high at 159 FPS, with a minimum of 135 FPS and a maximum of 183 FPS. The High preset delivers 132 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset still provides a comfortably smooth 85 FPS average. At this resolution, even the most demanding settings leave substantial headroom above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the expected impact of increased pixel count. The Low preset averages 160 FPS, a 61 FPS drop from the 1080p result. Medium settings produce an average of 115 FPS, with the minimum frame rate recorded at 98 FPS and the maximum at 132 FPS. High settings follow with a 95 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 1440p is the notable result here, averaging 61 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold. This makes 1440p Ultra the highest visual quality setting that remains fully playable at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the demands of 4K rendering become evident. The Low preset still delivers a very playable 101 FPS average. Medium settings average 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS, indicating that even during demanding scenes, the frame rate stays above the playable line. The High preset averages exactly 60 FPS, which is right at the threshold, meaning it is playable but with no margin for error. The Ultra preset, however, falls short with an average of just 39 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS target and would result in a noticeably less fluid experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark data places both components near specific rivals, which helps contextualize their performance. For the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, the nearest comparable processors are the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which scores 24964 and is 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core i7-11850H, which scores 24935 and is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i7-13620H is also very close with a score of 24911, 0.4% higher. On the other side, the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103, which is 0.4% lower than the 8400F. This grouping indicates that the 8400F performs essentially on par with these alternatives, meaning a system built with any of these CPUs would likely deliver very similar frame rates in Undisputed.

For the Intel Arc B580, the nearest GPU rivals are a mix of older and newer architectures. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, which is 0.2% higher than the B580. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 0.6% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, 0.7% higher, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1% higher. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the B580's raw benchmark performance is remarkably close to these cards. In practical terms for Undisputed, a system with an RTX 2080 or RTX 3080 would likely produce frame rates very similar to those measured for the Arc B580, as the differences in average benchmark scores are minimal.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling of frame rates across resolutions reveals which component is the limiting factor in this combo. At 1920x1080, the CPU and GPU are both heavily utilized, but the very high frame rates, such as 221 FPS on Low and 159 FPS on Medium, suggest that neither component is being pushed to its absolute limit. The jump from 1080p Low to 1440p Low shows a decrease from 221 FPS to 160 FPS, a 61 FPS drop. This is a substantial reduction, but the absolute numbers remain high.

The more telling comparison is between 1440p and 4K. At 1440p Ultra, the average is 61 FPS, while at 4K Ultra, it drops to 39 FPS. This 22 FPS decline for a 2.25x increase in pixel count indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The GPU's workload scales significantly with resolution, and the data shows this clearly. Conversely, the CPU's role is more critical at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher. For instance, the difference between 1080p Medium (159 FPS) and 1440p Medium (115 FPS) is 44 FPS, which is a larger absolute drop than the 34 FPS difference between 1440p Medium and 4K Medium (73 FPS). This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is doing more work to feed the GPU, and the frame rate is less constrained by the graphics card.

As resolution increases, the frame rate differences between presets also narrow, which further points to the GPU being the limiting factor. At 1080p, the spread between Low and Ultra is 136 FPS (221 to 85). At 1440p, that spread narrows to 99 FPS (160 to 61). At 4K, it narrows further to 62 FPS (101 to 39). This pattern is a classic indicator of GPU-bound performance at higher resolutions, where the graphics card's capabilities dictate the frame rate more than the CPU's processing power.

How This Combo Ranks

The overall performance of this combination places it in the upper portion of the tested field. The data shows a combo rank of 2794 out of 3718 total combinations tested for Undisputed. This percentile position indicates that this specific CPU and GPU pairing outperforms a majority of other configurations in the database. While it is not among the top-tier setups, it sits comfortably above the median, and the measured frame rates confirm that this rank is earned through consistent performance across all tested resolutions and presets. The rank reflects the balanced nature of the pairing, where the 8400F's solid multi-threaded capabilities and the B580's competitive GPU performance work together to avoid any severe bottlenecking in this game.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Undisputed is answered with a clear yes, based on the measured data and the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1920x1080, the system clears the threshold at every preset, including Ultra with an 85 FPS average, indicating a fully playable experience at maximum settings. At 2560x1440, the verdict is equally positive, with all four presets averaging above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 61 FPS is technically playable, though it leaves minimal headroom for any frame rate dips. At 3840x2160, the situation is more nuanced. The Low, Medium, and High presets all average at or above 60 FPS, with High hitting exactly 60 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, falls to 39 FPS and is not playable. Therefore, the system can run the game at 4K, but only with settings reduced from the maximum.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is as follows. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 85 FPS. This provides a high-quality visual experience with ample performance to spare. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also achieves the highest playable quality, with an average of 61 FPS. This is right at the threshold, so users prioritizing a consistent frame rate might prefer High settings at 95 FPS for a larger safety margin, but the data confirms Ultra is viable. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, which averages exactly 60 FPS. This is the recommended choice for 4K, as it balances visual fidelity with playable performance. The Medium preset at 73 FPS offers more headroom, and Low at 101 FPS is the smoothest option, but High provides the highest quality that still meets the 60 FPS standard.