Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Undisputed
Sports 2023

Undisputed

35%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
115 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
44 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
83 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
32 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
52 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
20 FPS
14.7ms Frame Time
22ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,549
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 27,247
Your GPU 1,184

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 20 31 38 52
1440p QHD 32 49 60 83
1080p Full HD 44 68 83 115

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 68
1920x1080 Low 115
1920x1080 Medium 83
1920x1080 Ultra 44
2560x1440 High 49
2560x1440 Low 83
2560x1440 Medium 60
2560x1440 Ultra 32
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 52
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 Ultra 20

Performance Analysis: Undisputed on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a measured performance profile for Undisputed that places this combination in the lower tier of tested systems. With a combo rank of 3429 out of 3718, the pairing sits near the bottom of the database's rankings, and the recorded frame rates confirm that this is a system suited for modest settings and lower resolutions. The CPU is a strong performer on its own, but the GPU's extremely low standing in the benchmark hierarchy dominates the overall result, making this a strictly entry-level configuration for this sports title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 3429 out of 3718 means the system outperforms only 289 other tested combinations. The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, holds a 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, which is a solid position. Its average benchmark score of 25005, driven by strong multi-thread results such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 and a single-core score of 2943, indicates a capable processor. In contrast, the Intel Arc B370 GPU sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. That percentile gap is stark: the CPU is clearly not the limiting factor. The GPU's low standing pulls the entire combo down, and the measured frame rates reflect a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound. In practical terms, this combination will struggle to maintain high frame rates at demanding settings, and the rank accurately captures that reality.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded FPS data across resolutions and settings reveals which component matters more. At 1080p, the lowest preset (Low) yields an average of 115 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 44 FPS. At 1440p, the same settings produce 83 FPS and 32 FPS respectively. At 4K, the numbers fall further: Low averages 52 FPS, Medium 38 FPS, and Ultra only 20 FPS. This scaling pattern is a classic sign of GPU limitation: as resolution increases, the frame rate drops sharply, and as settings are raised, the drop is equally pronounced. The CPU's performance, meanwhile, is strong enough to keep up with these loads. Its 6 cores and 12 threads, along with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, provide ample headroom for a sports game like Undisputed, which is not known for extreme CPU demands. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6091 and the Passmark multithread score of 24389 further confirm that the processor is not the bottleneck. Instead, the GPU's low pixel rate (48.00 GPixel/s) and texture rate (96.00 GTexel/s) limit how quickly frames can be rendered. The data shows that at every resolution, the difference between Low and Ultra is more than 50% of the Low value, indicating that the GPU is the dominant factor. Even at 1080p, where the CPU could theoretically push higher frame rates, the GPU caps performance: the jump from Low to Medium at 1080p drops the average from 115 to 83 FPS, a 32 FPS loss. Thus, for this game, the GPU is the primary determinant of playability at all tested resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database's nearest rival lists for both components provide context for what else would behave similarly. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is within 0.4% of four other processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is 0.2% faster, the Intel Core i7-11850H is 0.3% faster, the Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.4% faster, and the AMD EPYC 9474F is 0.4% slower. Any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates when paired with the same GPU, so a system with one of these processors would not change the overall experience. For the GPU, the Intel Arc B370 is closely matched with several older cards. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2% faster, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% faster, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% faster, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% slower. These deltas are minuscule, meaning that swapping the Arc B370 for any of these GPUs would result in essentially the same frame rates in Undisputed. This is a telling sign: the Arc B370, despite being a newer product, performs on par with integrated and low-end discrete GPUs from over a decade ago. For users considering alternatives, the data suggests that the GPU is the component to upgrade first if higher frame rates are desired.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Undisputed? The answer depends on the target resolution and settings. According to the verdict data, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. At 1920x1080, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best playable preset at an average of 68 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium are playable, with Medium achieving exactly 60 FPS on average. At 3840x2160, no settings reach 60 FPS; the highest average is 52 FPS on Low, which is below the playable threshold. Therefore, the system is suitable for 1080p gaming with high detail and for 1440p with medium detail, but it cannot handle 4K at any preset. The GPU's low performance is the sole reason for this limitation, as the CPU would have no trouble driving higher frame rates if the graphics card were stronger. For a sports game like Undisputed, which does not demand extreme visual fidelity, the 1080p High experience is smooth and responsive, while 1440p Medium is playable but leaves little headroom for fluctuations.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings for 1920x1080?

A: The best playable setting is High, with an average FPS of 68. Low and Medium are also playable, with averages of 115 and 83 respectively, but High offers the highest quality while still staying above 60 FPS.

Q: Can this system run the game at 2560x1440?

A: Yes, at Low and Medium presets. Medium is the best playable setting, achieving an average of 60 FPS. The High preset drops to 49 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 4K resolution playable with this combo?

A: No. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 52 on Low, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium averages 38 FPS, and Ultra only 20 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: It ranks 3429 out of 3718, meaning it outperforms only 289 other combinations. The CPU is in the 77th percentile, but the GPU is in the 5th percentile, which drags the overall rank down.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a launch MSRP of $170. This is the only pricing information available in the database for this combo.

Q: What are the GPU's closest performance rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 is within 0.7% of the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and AMD FirePro M2000. These GPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Undisputed.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 68 FPS. At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, with an average of exactly 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, there is no playable setting; the closest is Low at 52 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. These are the optimal choices for a smooth experience, balancing visual quality and frame rate.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table lists all recorded frame rates from the database, including average, minimum, and maximum values where available. Some entries do not have min/max data recorded.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 31 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 52 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 38 | 32 | 43 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 20 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | High | 49 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 83 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 60 | 51 | 69 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 32 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | High | 68 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 115 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 83 | 70 | 95 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 44 | - | - |

The data shows a clear trend: frame rates drop by roughly 30-40% when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and another 30-40% from 1440p to 4K, at equivalent settings. The only setting with recorded min/max values is Medium, where the 1080p run shows a range from 70 to 95 FPS, and the 1440p run from 51 to 69 FPS, indicating some variability but still within playable bounds at 1440p. The Ultra preset is consistently below 60 FPS at all resolutions, confirming that the GPU cannot handle the highest visual quality. For users who prioritize frame rate over visuals, the Low preset offers the highest averages, but the best balance for a typical gamer is High at 1080p or Medium at 1440p.