Undisputed

FAQ

Q: Can the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B390 run Undisputed at 1080p?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the combo clears the 60 FPS threshold on Low, Medium, and High presets. Low averages 127 FPS, Medium averages 91 FPS, and High averages 76 FPS. Ultra drops to 49 FPS, so that preset is not playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: Medium is the best playable preset at 1440p, with an average of 66 FPS and a recorded range of 56 to 76 FPS. Low is also playable at 92 FPS, while High falls just short at 55 FPS and Ultra is not playable at 35 FPS.

Q: Is Undisputed playable at 4K with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, none of the four tested presets reach the 60 FPS playable threshold. Low averages 58 FPS, Medium 42 FPS, High 35 FPS, and Ultra 22 FPS. The closest is Low, but it still misses the mark.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p Ultra?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 49, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. This preset is not considered playable for this combination.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 scores an average benchmark of 26324. It sits within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (26187, 0.5% ahead), within 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-11900KF (26212, 0.4% ahead), within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26274, 0.2% ahead), and trails the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS by 0.3% (26402). The differences are negligible.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Arc B390 scores 1482 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. It is 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1463), 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 800M (1460), 2.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (1446), and 2.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443). This places the GPU in the 9th percentile of all GPUs.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU portions of this combo each have nearby hardware that would produce broadly similar results in the database's measured tests.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 7600, the closest performance neighbor is the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS, which scores 26402 in average benchmarks, a mere 0.3% higher. The Ryzen 9 6900HX is also effectively tied, scoring 26274 (0.2% lower). The Intel Core i9-11900KF (26212) and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (26187) round out the group, all within half a percentage point. For workloads that depend heavily on CPU throughput, any of these processors would behave nearly identically to the Ryzen 5 7600, though the desktop Ryzen 5 7600 carries a 65 W TDP and uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B390's nearest rivals are all NVIDIA parts from older generations. The GeForce GT 520MX scores 1463 (1.3% lower), the GeForce 800M scores 1460 (1.5% lower), the GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1446 (2.5% lower), and the GeForce GT 710 scores 1443 (2.7% lower). These are all low-end GPUs with similar 3DMark Steel Nomad results, meaning users upgrading from any of these cards would see only a marginal improvement in raw GPU compute. The Arc B390 is a mobile-oriented part with system-shared memory, integrated into the Panther Lake platform, and its performance profile closely matches these older discrete options.

When paired together, the system is heavily GPU-limited in Undisputed. The CPU's synthetic strength (78th percentile among all CPUs) does not translate into high frame rates because the GPU sits in the 9th percentile. Users looking for a meaningfully faster experience would need to consider a substantially stronger GPU rather than a CPU swap.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data covers four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) across three resolutions. All measurements are from the database's own testing.

1920x1080:

• Low: Average 127 FPS. No min/max values recorded.
• Medium: Average 91 FPS, with a minimum of 78 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS.
• High: Average 76 FPS. No min/max values recorded.
• Ultra: Average 49 FPS. No min/max values recorded.

At 1080p, the step from Low to Medium costs 36 FPS on average, and the step from Medium to High costs another 15 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra is the steepest drop, losing 27 FPS and falling below the 60 FPS threshold.

2560x1440:

• Low: Average 92 FPS. No min/max values recorded.
• Medium: Average 66 FPS, with a minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 76 FPS.
• High: Average 55 FPS. No min/max values recorded.
• Ultra: Average 35 FPS. No min/max values recorded.

At 1440p, Low remains comfortable at 92 FPS, but the preset scaling is severe. Medium barely clears the playable threshold with an average of 66 FPS, while High drops to 55 FPS and Ultra falls to 35 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 56 FPS shows that dips below 60 are possible even at the best playable setting.

3840x2160:

• Low: Average 58 FPS. No min/max values recorded.
• Medium: Average 42 FPS, with a minimum of 36 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS.
• High: Average 35 FPS. No min/max values recorded.
• Ultra: Average 22 FPS. No min/max values recorded.

At 4K, no preset reaches 60 FPS. Low is the closest at 58 FPS, just two frames shy. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall well below, with Ultra delivering only 22 FPS. The Medium range of 36 to 48 FPS indicates consistent sub-60 performance throughout.

The Verdict

This PC can run Undisputed, but only under specific conditions. The database's playable threshold is 60 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the combination is playable at Low, Medium, and High presets. The best playable setting is High, with an average of 76 FPS. Low and Medium are also viable, with averages of 127 FPS and 91 FPS respectively. Ultra is not playable, averaging 49 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the combination is playable at Low and Medium. The best playable setting is Medium, averaging 66 FPS. Low averages 92 FPS. High falls below the threshold at 55 FPS, and Ultra averages 35 FPS, neither of which is playable.

At 3840x2160, the combination is not playable at any preset. Low comes closest at 58 FPS, but the other presets are far behind: Medium 42 FPS, High 35 FPS, and Ultra 22 FPS.

In practical terms, users should target 1080p High or 1440p Medium for a smooth experience. 4K is off the table entirely.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear pattern: the GPU is the limiting factor in Undisputed, and its influence grows as resolution increases.

At 1920x1080, the CPU has enough headroom to push frame rates high at lower presets: Low averages 127 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS threshold. This suggests the CPU can feed the GPU well at this resolution. However, the GPU's ceiling becomes apparent at Ultra, where the average collapses to 49 FPS. The 78 FPS drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p is primarily a GPU-side rendering load issue, not a CPU bottleneck.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's limitations become more pronounced. Low averages 92 FPS (a 27.6% drop from 1080p Low), while Medium averages 66 FPS (a 27.5% drop from 1080p Medium). High and Ultra see even larger relative declines: 55 FPS (down from 76) and 35 FPS (down from 49). The consistent percentage drops across presets indicate the GPU is scaling predictably with pixel count, while the CPU's role remains constant.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is thoroughly saturated. Low averages 58 FPS, which is only 36.9% of the 1080p Low result. Medium drops to 42 FPS, and Ultra to 22 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 36 FPS, a much smaller absolute spread than at 1080p (78 FPS). This compression of frame rates at higher resolutions is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario: the GPU is already near its limit even at Low settings, so raising preset quality has less headroom to operate.

The CPU's 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 architecture with a 5.10 GHz boost clock is clearly sufficient for this game at all tested resolutions. The recorded FPS patterns show no evidence of CPU-side stalls, even at 1080p Low where frame rates reach 127 FPS. The decision point for users is purely about GPU capability: at 1080p and 1440p, moderate presets deliver playable results; at 4K, no preset does.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's tested combinations for Undisputed, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B390 ranks 3304 out of 3718 tested combos. That places it in the bottom 11.1% of all systems tested for this game.

This low ranking is almost entirely attributable to the GPU. The Arc B390's 9th percentile standing among all GPUs, combined with its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1482, places it in the same performance class as NVIDIA's GT 520MX and GT 710. The CPU, by contrast, sits in the 78th percentile among all CPUs, meaning the processor is far stronger than the graphics solution.

The practical consequence is that this system delivers playable frame rates only at 1080p and 1440p with reduced settings. The combo's rank reflects that limitation: most other tested combinations in the database achieve higher frame rates, either through stronger GPUs or more balanced pairings. Users with this specific hardware should expect a playable but modest experience, while users seeking higher preset quality or 4K capability would need to look at combinations ranked substantially higher.