Undisputed

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces its weakest results. The High preset delivers an average of 31 FPS, while Medium sits slightly higher at 38 FPS with a minimum of 32 FPS and a maximum of 43 FPS. Dropping to Low raises the average to 52 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls to just 20 FPS. None of these settings approach the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance improves noticeably. The Low preset hits an average of 83 FPS, making it the fastest option at this resolution. Medium follows at exactly 60 FPS on average, with a recorded range of 51 to 69 FPS. High drops to 49 FPS average, and Ultra falls further to 32 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is substantial, a 51 FPS difference that underscores how heavily the Ultra preset taxes this combination.

At 1920x1080, the picture becomes much more favorable. Low delivers 115 FPS average, the highest recorded figure across all tests for this combo. Medium averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS and maximum of 95 FPS, while High reaches 68 FPS. Ultra remains the outlier at 44 FPS, still short of the playability threshold. The scaling from 1440p to 1080p is clear: every preset gains roughly 20 to 30 FPS, with Low going from 83 to 115 FPS and Medium from 60 to 83 FPS.

The data shows that the Arc B370, a chip with a 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database, leans heavily on resolution and preset selection. At 4K, even Low settings cannot clear 60 FPS, while at 1080p, three of the four presets do.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the verdict is straightforward: no preset achieves 60 FPS. The highest average is 52 FPS on Low, which is 8 FPS short of the playability threshold. Medium offers 38 FPS, High 31 FPS, and Ultra 20 FPS. The database records no playable settings at this resolution, meaning users should avoid 4K if they want a smooth experience.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an exact average of 60 FPS. The minimum of 51 FPS indicates some dips below the threshold, but the average clears it. Low also qualifies at 83 FPS, but Medium is the better recommendation for visual quality while maintaining playability. High and Ultra fall short at 49 FPS and 32 FPS respectively.

For 1920x1080, the best settings choice is High, which averages 68 FPS. This is the most visually demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS line. Low and Medium also qualify at 115 FPS and 83 FPS, but High offers the best balance. Ultra sits at 44 FPS, so it is not recommended for consistent performance. The recorded data indicates that 1080p High is the sweet spot for this combo, delivering a 24 FPS margin above the threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The Intel Arc B370 is the dominant constraint in this pairing. The GPU's percentile ranking sits at 5 among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 1184 places it near legacy parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770. The Ryzen 5 7600, by contrast, ranks in the 78th percentile among CPUs with an average benchmark score of 26324. This mismatch means the GPU is the bottleneck in nearly every scenario.

The scaling between resolutions confirms this. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, average FPS drops by roughly 25% across presets. From 1440p to 4K, the drop is even steeper. For example, Low goes from 115 FPS at 1080p to 83 FPS at 1440p to 52 FPS at 4K. This pattern indicates that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are being saturated as pixel count rises. The Arc B370's memory is system shared and bandwidth is system dependent, so higher resolutions exacerbate its limitations.

Preset scaling also points to GPU-bound behavior. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium costs 32 FPS, from Medium to High costs 15 FPS, and from High to Ultra costs 24 FPS. The Ultra preset, with its 20 FPS average at 4K, suggests the GPU is overwhelmed by the additional shading and post-processing work. The CPU, with 6 cores and 12 threads and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, has ample headroom for a sports title like Undisputed, which rarely needs more than a few threads.

At 4K, the CPU's role is minimal. Even on Low, the GPU cannot reach 60 FPS, so the Ryzen 5 7600 sits idle waiting for frames. At 1080p, the CPU could theoretically push higher frame rates, but the Arc B370 caps output. The data shows no scenario where CPU performance limits the game; every bottleneck traces back to the GPU.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Undisputed? The answer depends on resolution and settings. At 3840x2160, no preset clears 60 FPS. The best case is Low at 52 FPS, which is playable but not smooth. The database marks zero playable settings at 4K, so users should not expect a satisfying experience at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the combo clears the threshold with Low and Medium. Medium averages exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playability bar. The minimum of 51 FPS means occasional stutters, but the overall experience is acceptable. High and Ultra fall short at 49 FPS and 32 FPS, so those presets are off the table.

At 1920x1080, the verdict is positive. High averages 68 FPS, Low hits 115 FPS, and Medium sits at 83 FPS. All three clear 60 FPS with room to spare. Ultra remains below the threshold at 44 FPS, so it is the only preset to avoid. For a 1080p gamer, this PC runs Undisputed well on High settings, which is the recommended configuration according to the measured data.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX has an average score of 26274, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7600. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26402, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, 0.4% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, 0.5% higher. All four rivals are within a fraction of a percent of the Ryzen 5 7600's 26324 average, so swapping to any of them would produce nearly identical CPU performance in Undisputed. None of these alternatives would change the GPU-bound outcome; the frame rates would remain the same.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are all legacy parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, 0.2% higher than the Arc B370's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher, and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, 1.4% lower. These deltas are small, meaning the Arc B370 behaves like a very old discrete GPU in this title. Users coming from any of these parts would see almost identical FPS numbers, with the Arc B370 being essentially a modern equivalent in performance terms. The practical takeaway: this GPU tier is not built for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming in Undisputed.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3429 out of 3718 tested combos in the database for Undisputed. That places it in the bottom 8% of all configurations. The ranking reflects the GPU's weak showing rather than the CPU's capability; the Ryzen 5 7600 is a strong processor, but the Arc B370 drags the combo down.

This rank means that most other tested systems will outperform this pairing in Undisputed. The only combos ranked lower are those with even weaker GPUs or more mismatched pairings. For context, the GPU alone ranks in the 5th percentile, so the combo rank is consistent with that. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking does little to lift the overall position because the game is GPU-bound at every resolution tested.

In practical terms, this combo is suitable for 1080p gaming at Medium or High settings, and 1440p at Medium at best. It is not a system for 4K or for high preset gaming. Users seeking better performance would need to pair the Ryzen 5 7600 with a significantly stronger GPU, as the CPU has plenty of headroom left on the table. The recorded data shows that the GPU is the sole limiting factor, and upgrading it would unlock far higher frame rates across all resolutions.