Undisputed

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Arc B370 shows a wide performance arc across the three resolutions and four quality presets tested. The measurements are complete for average FPS at every setting, with minimum and maximum values captured only for Medium presets at each resolution.

At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Low preset delivers an average of 52 FPS, which is the strongest showing at this resolution. Medium falls to 38 FPS on average, with measured dips to 32 FPS and peaks at 43 FPS. High drops further to 31 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 20 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 32 FPS, indicating that the preset choice has an outsized impact at 4K.

Moving to 2560x1440, the picture improves substantially. Low settings produce an average of 83 FPS, comfortably above the playable threshold. Medium achieves exactly 60 FPS on average, with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS. High trails at 49 FPS, and Ultra falls to 32 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 51 FPS, showing that the preset scaling remains steep even when the pixel count drops by roughly 44 percent compared to 4K.

At 1920x1080, the combination reaches its most capable territory. Low settings yield 115 FPS on average, the highest figure recorded anywhere in the dataset. Medium delivers 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS. High maintains 68 FPS, which clears the playable threshold with a modest margin. Ultra drops to 44 FPS, once again showing that the most demanding preset exceeds what this hardware can sustain smoothly.

The minimum and maximum frames at Medium settings illustrate the consistency pattern. At 1080p, the range from minimum to maximum is 25 FPS. At 1440p, the range narrows to 18 FPS. At 4K, the range is 11 FPS. This tightening of the frame window as resolution increases suggests that the GPU becomes the primary limiter, smoothing out burst variability that appears at lower resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

The verdict data identifies the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches that threshold. The closest is Low at 52 FPS, which remains 8 FPS short of playable. The database records no best setting for this resolution because none qualify.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, with an average of exactly 60 FPS. This is a precise match to the playable threshold, meaning the system runs at the boundary of what the database considers smooth. Low also qualifies at 83 FPS, but Medium is the highest preset that stays at or above the line.

At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is High, with an average of 68 FPS. This provides an 8 FPS cushion above the threshold, which is a more comfortable margin than the 1440p Medium result. Low and Medium also qualify at 115 FPS and 83 FPS respectively, but High represents the maximum quality that maintains playability.

The progression of best settings across resolutions shows a clear pattern: 1080p supports High, 1440p supports Medium, and 4K supports nothing. Each step up in resolution costs one preset tier of quality, which is a consistent and predictable scaling behavior.

How This Combo Ranks

The database places this specific CPU and GPU combination at rank 3429 out of 3718 tested combos for Undisputed. This puts the combo in the bottom 8 percent of all configurations measured, which is a low standing overall.

The rank reflects the Intel Arc B370's position in the GPU landscape more than the CPU's capabilities. The GPU sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 1184. The CPU, by contrast, lands at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964. This mismatch between a high-percentile CPU and a very low-percentile GPU explains why the combo ranks so far down the list despite having a modern processor.

The practical consequence of this ranking is that the combo behaves like a GPU-limited system. At every resolution and preset, the frame rates align with what the GPU can deliver rather than what the CPU could feed. The CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores do not translate into higher FPS because the GPU becomes the bottleneck well before the CPU is stressed.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 60 FPS on a 4K display?

A: No. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 52 FPS on Low settings. Medium averages 38 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 20 FPS. No preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best quality setting at 1440p that stays playable?

A: Medium is the best setting at 2560x1440 that maintains at least 60 FPS, with an average of exactly 60 FPS. Low also qualifies at 83 FPS, but Medium is the highest qualifying preset.

Q: How does the system perform at 1080p on High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 on High, the average FPS is 68, which is 8 FPS above the playable threshold. This is the best quality preset that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: Is Ultra settings playable at any resolution?

A: No. Ultra averages 44 FPS at 1080p, 32 FPS at 1440p, and 20 FPS at 4K. All three figures fall well below the 60 FPS threshold, making Ultra unsuitable at every resolution tested.

Q: How much performance drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings?

A: At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 83 at 1080p to 60 at 1440p, a decrease of 23 FPS. The minimum frame rate also drops from 70 to 51, while the maximum drops from 95 to 69.

Q: What does the combo's rank of 3429 out of 3718 indicate?

A: The rank places this configuration in the lower portion of all tested combos for Undisputed, with roughly 92 percent of tested combinations performing better. This low rank is driven primarily by the GPU, which sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates that the Intel Arc B370 is the dominant performance factor in this pairing. The GPU's average benchmark score of 1184 places it at the 5th percentile, while the CPU's average score of 24964 places it at the 77th percentile. When a GPU ranks this low relative to the CPU, the frame rates in a game like Undisputed will track the GPU's capabilities almost exclusively.

The scaling between resolutions confirms this GPU-bound behavior. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings reduces the average FPS from 83 to 60, a 28 percent drop. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings reduces the average from 60 to 38, a 37 percent drop. These are large reductions that align with the increasing pixel counts, which is characteristic of a system limited by the graphics processor rather than the central processor.

The preset scaling further supports this interpretation. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 71 FPS (115 down to 44). At 1440p, the difference is 51 FPS (83 down to 32). At 4K, the difference is 32 FPS (52 down to 20). As resolution increases, the absolute difference between presets shrinks, which happens when the GPU is already saturated and additional quality settings have diminishing impact on the already-low frame rates.

The CPU's role in this game appears to be sufficient but not decisive. With 6 cores, 12 threads, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, the Ryzen 5 7500F provides strong single-thread performance, as shown by its Geekbench single-core score of 2374 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218. These scores are far above what the GPU's performance level would require for a sports title like Undisputed. The CPU is never the limiting factor in this data; the GPU reaches its ceiling first at every resolution and preset.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Undisputed depends entirely on the resolution and settings chosen. The database's verdict by resolution provides a clear answer.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot run the game at a playable level. No preset reaches 60 FPS, and the best case is Low at 52 FPS. Users with a 4K display would need to accept frame rates below the playable threshold or reduce the resolution.

At 2560x1440, the system can run the game at 60 FPS with Medium settings, which is the best qualifying preset. Low settings provide a more comfortable 83 FPS. High and Ultra fall short at 49 FPS and 32 FPS respectively.

At 1920x1080, the system runs the game well. High settings deliver 68 FPS, which is the best playable preset. Low and Medium are also playable at 115 FPS and 83 FPS. Ultra is not playable at 44 FPS.

The overall verdict is that this combo handles Undisputed at 1080p and 1440p with appropriate settings, but fails at 4K. The playable settings at each resolution are: 1080p High, 1440p Medium, and no playable setting at 4K. This is a functional gaming system for the game, provided the user matches resolution to the hardware's limits.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU in the database provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly in this game.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, the closest alternatives by average benchmark score are the Intel Core i7-11850H with a score of 24935 and a delta of 0.1 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with a score of 25005 and a delta of -0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-13620H with a score of 24911 and a delta of 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core 5 210H with a score of 24872 and a delta of 0.4 percent. Any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical processor-side performance in Undisputed, meaning the frame rates would remain unchanged given the same GPU.

For the Intel Arc B370, the nearest rivals are all older or lower-tier GPUs. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186 with a delta of -0.2 percent, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 with a delta of -0.5 percent, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 with a delta of -0.7 percent, and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168 with a delta of 1.4 percent. These deltas are all within 1.4 percent of the Arc B370's score of 1184, indicating that these GPUs would produce very similar FPS results in Undisputed at the same settings and resolutions.

The practical takeaway from these rival lists is that the GPU side of this combo is the weak link. Swapping the CPU for any of its nearest rivals would change almost nothing in game performance, because the GPU remains the bottleneck. Swapping the GPU for any of its nearest rivals would also change little, because all of them sit at the same low performance tier. Users seeking higher FPS in Undisputed would need to move to a GPU well above this performance class, as the current tier caps the game at the measured frame rates regardless of CPU choice.