Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Undisputed
Sports 2023

Undisputed

28%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
115 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
44 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
83 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
32 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
52 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
20 FPS
14.7ms Frame Time
22ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,549
Your CPU 19,593
Graphics Card
Required 27,247
Your GPU 1,184

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 20 31 38 52
1440p QHD 32 49 60 83
1080p Full HD 44 68 83 115

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 68
1920x1080 Low 115
1920x1080 Medium 83
1920x1080 Ultra 44
2560x1440 High 49
2560x1440 Low 83
2560x1440 Medium 60
2560x1440 Ultra 32
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 52
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 Ultra 20

Performance Analysis: Undisputed on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for Undisputed with the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Intel Arc B370 shows a clear performance hierarchy across the three tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, the frame rates are consistently low, with the Ultra preset averaging 20 FPS, High averaging 31 FPS, and Medium averaging 38 FPS with a recorded minimum of 32 FPS and maximum of 43 FPS. The Low preset at 4K improves to an average of 52 FPS, but this still falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data indicates that 4K is not a viable target for this combination, even at the lowest settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves markedly. The Low preset delivers an average of 83 FPS, while Medium averages exactly 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS. High settings drop to an average of 49 FPS, and Ultra falls to 32 FPS. The 1440p results show a steep curve: Low and Medium are comfortably within playable range, but High and Ultra are not. The gap between Low and High at this resolution is 34 FPS, which highlights how demanding the higher presets are on this hardware.

At 1920x1080, the combination performs best. Low settings produce an average of 115 FPS, Medium averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS, and High averages 68 FPS. Ultra is the only preset that fails to reach 60 FPS, averaging 44 FPS. The 1080p data shows that the CPU and GPU can handle the game well at most settings, with only the maximum preset pushing the hardware too far. Across all three resolutions, the pattern is consistent: Ultra is the most punishing preset, and the delta between Low and Ultra grows larger as resolution increases.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database defines playable performance as an average of at least 60 FPS. Based on the measured data, the best playable setting at each resolution is the most demanding preset that still clears that threshold.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The highest average recorded is 52 FPS on Low, which is below the playable threshold. The verdict data confirms that 4K has no playable settings for this combo, so the answer is none.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, with an average of 60 FPS. This is exactly at the threshold, and the recorded minimum of 51 FPS means there will be occasional dips below 60, but the average qualifies. Low also qualifies at 83 FPS, but Medium is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for visual quality at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is High, with an average of 68 FPS. This is 8 FPS above the threshold, providing a small margin. Low and Medium also qualify, at 115 FPS and 83 FPS respectively, but High offers the best visual fidelity among the playable options. Ultra fails at 44 FPS, so it is excluded. In summary, 1080p High is the optimal configuration for this system, 1440p Medium is the ceiling at that resolution, and 4K has no viable preset.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Intel Arc B370 divide responsibilities across resolutions and presets. The Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution with a 3 nm Panther Lake chip, 1280 shading units, and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Its performance percentile is 5th among all GPUs, and its only recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1184. This places it in a very low tier of graphics hardware, which strongly influences the results.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The average FPS drops from 52 on Low to 20 on Ultra, a 32 FPS swing that is driven almost entirely by pixel throughput and shading load. The CPU, with 6 cores and 12 threads based on Zen 3, has ample headroom at this resolution because the GPU cannot feed frames fast enough. The 4K results show minimal CPU sensitivity: the frame rate scales directly with GPU workload, and even the Low preset cannot reach 60 FPS, indicating the GPU is saturated.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The CPU begins to matter more at lower presets. Low settings average 83 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate that the CPU's single-thread performance of 836 in 3DMark single-thread and 2319 in Cinebench R23 single-core becomes relevant. Medium drops to 60 FPS, and High falls to 49 FPS, showing that the GPU is again the bottleneck as settings increase. The CPU can sustain 83 FPS at Low, but the GPU cannot maintain that pace at High or Ultra. This suggests a crossover point around Medium where the bottleneck moves from CPU to GPU.

At 1920x1080, the CPU's role is more pronounced. Low settings reach 115 FPS, which requires strong per-core performance; the Ryzen 5 5500 delivers a Passmark single-thread score of 3058, which is sufficient for this level. Medium at 83 FPS and High at 68 FPS still show GPU limitation, but the gap between Low and High is 47 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint across all presets. The CPU is not the limiting factor even at 1080p Low, as the 115 FPS average suggests it can push higher if the GPU allowed. Overall, the GPU dominates the performance envelope at all resolutions, while the CPU only becomes a potential bottleneck at very low settings and high frame rates, which this GPU rarely reaches.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 provide context for CPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's average benchmark score is 19593, with a percentile rank of 73 among all CPUs. Its closest competitors are the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 with an average score of 19617 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-12500 at 19668 with a delta of -0.4%, the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499 with a delta of 0.5%, and the Intel Core i5-11600KF at 19723 with a delta of -0.7%. These deltas are all within 1% of the Ryzen 5 5500, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios. In Undisputed, where the GPU is the main bottleneck, swapping the CPU to any of these rivals would change results by less than 1%, so the measured FPS would remain effectively unchanged.

The Intel Arc B370 has a much more constrained set of rivals. Its average benchmark score is 1184, with a percentile rank of 5 among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186 with a delta of -0.2%, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190 with a delta of -0.5%, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192 with a delta of -0.7%, and the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168 with a delta of 1.4%. These are all legacy or low-end parts from over a decade ago, and their performance deltas are similarly tiny. In practice, any of these GPUs would deliver frame rates within 2% of the Arc B370 in Undisputed, meaning the same playability verdict applies: 1080p High at 68 FPS, 1440p Medium at 60 FPS, and no playable 4K settings. The data suggests that the Arc B370 is competing with hardware from a much older generation, which explains its low 5th percentile ranking and its difficulty with modern game presets.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's overall ranking for Undisputed, this combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3429 out of 3718 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 8% of all systems tested for this game. The rank reflects the GPU's severe limitation, as the CPU alone would rank much higher given its 73rd percentile standing. The combo rank of 3429 is driven by the fact that the Arc B370 is an integrated GPU with only 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 20 ROPs, which is far below what modern discrete GPUs offer. The data shows that this system is positioned near the bottom of the performance ladder for Undisputed, and only a small fraction of tested combos perform worse. This rank aligns with the measured FPS: the system can handle 1080p and 1440p at modest settings, but it cannot approach high-end performance at 4K or at Ultra presets anywhere.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Undisputed? The answer depends on the resolution and preset. According to the verdict data, at 3840x2160 there are no playable settings, meaning no preset achieves an average of 60 FPS. The best result at 4K is Low at 52 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best at exactly 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best at 68 FPS. The system can run Undisputed smoothly at 1080p with High settings, and at 1440p with Medium settings, but it cannot handle 4K or Ultra presets at any resolution. Players who prioritize visual quality should stick to 1080p High, while those who want higher resolution should accept Medium at 1440p with a 60 FPS average and occasional dips to 51 FPS. The 60 FPS threshold is met at these settings, but the margin is thin at 1440p Medium, so frame-rate dips may be noticeable during intense gameplay scenes.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and setting for this PC to run Undisputed?

A: The best combination is 1920x1080 with High settings, which averages 68 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays above the 60 FPS playable threshold at any resolution.

Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 4K?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 52 on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data lists no playable settings at 4K.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184. Its nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192, and the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168. All are within 1.4% performance of each other.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 a bottleneck for this GPU?

A: No. The GPU is the primary bottleneck at all resolutions. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12500, is only 0.4% faster on average, so the CPU has sufficient headroom for the Arc B370's performance level.

Q: What FPS does this system get at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The average is exactly 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS. This qualifies as playable, but the minimum is close to the threshold.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems for Undisputed?

A: This combination ranks 3429 out of 3718 tested combos, placing it in the lower portion of the database's tested systems for this game.