Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Technomancer
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 53 | 66 | 85 |
| 1440p QHD | 80 | 101 | 116 | 154 |
| 1080p Full HD | 121 | 151 | 180 | 235 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System
The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is an exceptionally powerful combination for The Technomancer, delivering 60+ FPS at every preset tested across 1080p and 1440p, and only failing to hit that mark at 4K Ultra and 4K High. The data shows this combo ranks in the top 22% of all tested configurations, making it a high-end solution that is primarily limited by the GPU at higher resolutions rather than the CPU.
FAQ
Q: What is the best 4K setting for this combo?
A: Medium is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 3840x2160, with an average of 65.7 FPS. High drops to 53.1 FPS and Ultra falls to 41.5 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: Can this system handle 1440p with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 79.6 FPS, well above the 60 FPS threshold. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Core i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79097, placing it just 0.3% below the Intel Core i9-14900KF and 0.6% below the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus. It is 1.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7413 but 1.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395.
Q: What GPU is most similar in performance to the RTX 4070?
A: The NVIDIA Tesla P4 is the closest rival, with an average score of 37628 versus the RTX 4070's 37648, a delta of just 0.1%. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is also very close at 37507 (0.4% difference).
Q: Is the RTX 4070 still in production?
A: No, the production status is listed as "End-of-life." Its predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, Low averages 235.1 FPS while Ultra averages 121.1 FPS. This represents a 94% performance drop from Low to Ultra, but both remain far above the 60 FPS threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the primary performance bottleneck as resolution increases, while the Intel Core i9-14900K provides ample headroom at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extraordinarily high across all settings — from 235.1 FPS on Low to 121.1 FPS on Ultra — indicating that the CPU is feeding the GPU more than enough data and the GPU is not yet saturated. The CPU's multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 58674, ensures that even the most demanding game logic poses no challenge.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down proportionally: Ultra drops from 121.1 FPS to 79.6 FPS, a reduction of 34%. This scaling suggests the GPU is now the limiting factor, as the CPU's workload does not increase with resolution. The RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth become more relevant at this resolution, but the card still delivers playable performance at every preset.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become stark. Ultra drops to 41.5 FPS, a 48% reduction from 1440p Ultra, and even High only manages 53.1 FPS. The RTX 4070's 5888 shading units and 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are simply insufficient for 4K Ultra in this title. The CPU's role diminishes further — the gap between Low (85.2 FPS) and Ultra (41.5 FPS) at 4K is 51%, nearly identical to the scaling seen at lower resolutions. This confirms that the GPU is the sole determinant of performance at 4K, while the i9-14900K's massive compute capabilities (24 cores, 32 threads, 6.00 GHz boost) are never the constraining factor.
Interestingly, the scaling from Medium to High at 4K is only 13.6 FPS (65.7 to 53.1), while the jump from High to Ultra is 11.6 FPS (53.1 to 41.5). This non-linear degradation indicates that Ultra settings impose a particularly heavy load on the GPU's render output units and texture units, which are rated at 158.4 GPixel/s and 455.4 GTexel/s respectively.
Best Settings per Resolution
3840x2160 (4K): The best playable setting is Medium, which averages 65.7 FPS. This is the only preset above the 60 FPS threshold besides Low (85.2 FPS), and it offers substantially better visual fidelity than Low. High falls short at 53.1 FPS, and Ultra is unplayable at 41.5 FPS.
2560x1440 (1440p): Ultra is the clear choice here, averaging 79.6 FPS. This is 32% higher than the 60 FPS threshold, providing a comfortable margin for demanding scenes. All lower presets are also playable, with High at 101.2 FPS, Medium at 116.2 FPS, and Low at 154.2 FPS, but there is no reason to sacrifice quality when Ultra is already well above the playable mark.
1920x1080 (1080p): Ultra averages 121.1 FPS, more than double the 60 FPS threshold. This is the recommended setting for all users, as even the most demanding preset leaves significant performance headroom. High (150.5 FPS), Medium (179.7 FPS), and Low (235.1 FPS) are all options for users with high-refresh-rate displays, but Ultra provides the best visual experience without any risk of dropping below 60 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
The Core i9-14900K + RTX 4070 combination ranks 820th out of 3696 tested configurations in The Technomancer, placing it in the top 22.2% of all systems. This is a strong result, but the rank reveals that there are 820 configurations that perform better — likely those with higher-end GPUs like the RTX 4080 or RTX 4090, since the CPU is demonstrably not a limiting factor in this game.
The CPU's percentile ranking of 95 (vs all CPUs) and the GPU's percentile of 81 (vs all GPUs) tell a nuanced story: the i9-14900K is near the top of the CPU hierarchy, but the RTX 4070 is only in the 81st percentile of GPUs. This mismatch explains why the combo's overall rank (top 22%) is lower than the CPU's percentile would suggest. The GPU's average benchmark score of 37648 is respectable, but it is clearly the weaker link in this pairing for The Technomancer.
At 4K, the combo's rank is likely dragged down by the GPU's inability to maintain 60 FPS at High or Ultra. At 1440p and 1080p, the rank would be considerably higher, as the system delivers exceptional frame rates at all settings. The data indicates that this is a well-balanced system for 1440p gaming, but for 4K it is a GPU-limited configuration.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU: The nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which scores 79371 on average — just 0.3% higher than the i9-14900K's 79097. This is essentially identical performance, making the KF a drop-in alternative for users who don't need integrated graphics. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (79574, 0.6% higher) and AMD EPYC 7413 (80041, 1.2% higher) are also within a 1.2% margin, though these are very different platforms. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, which is 1.7% lower, meaning the i9-14900K holds a slight edge over that option. Any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in The Technomancer, as the game is clearly GPU-bound once a modern high-end processor is installed.
For the GPU: The NVIDIA Tesla P4 is the closest match with a score of 37628, just 0.1% below the RTX 4070. This is a datacenter card, so it's not a practical consumer alternative, but it indicates the performance tier. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507, 0.4% lower) is a legitimate consumer alternative that would deliver nearly identical frame rates in this game. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135, 1.3% higher) is more powerful but is a laptop part, so comparisons are complicated by thermal and power constraints. The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37157, 1.3% lower) is slightly slower but would still produce playable results at 1080p and 1440p. For practical purposes, the RX Vega 56 is the most realistic alternative — users with that card would see within 1% of the RTX 4070's performance.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run The Technomancer, and it does so with exceptional headroom at standard gaming resolutions. The verdict is clear from the data: at 1920x1080, every preset from Low (235.1 FPS) to Ultra (121.1 FPS) is not just playable but far beyond the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the system maintains 79.6 FPS on Ultra, providing a smooth experience with maximum visual quality. The only limitation appears at 3840x2160, where the playable settings are limited to Low (85.2 FPS) and Medium (65.7 FPS), while High (53.1 FPS) and Ultra (41.5 FPS) fall short.
The i9-14900K's extraordinary compute resources — 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 6.00 GHz boost clock — ensure that CPU performance never becomes a factor in this title. The RTX 4070, while not a top-tier 4K card, delivers excellent 1080p and 1440p performance with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and Ada Lovelace architecture. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p, this combo is overkill in the best way, offering frame rates that exceed most high-refresh-rate displays. For 4K enthusiasts, the system is still viable but requires dropping to Medium settings for a locked 60 FPS experience. Overall, this is a highly capable gaming system for The Technomancer, with the GPU being the sole limiting factor at the highest resolutions.