Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Technomancer
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 22 | 29 | 33 | 44 |
| 1440p QHD | 41 | 52 | 61 | 79 |
| 1080p Full HD | 62 | 80 | 93 | 121 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System
The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a widely variable experience in The Technomancer, heavily dependent on the target resolution. The data shows a classic performance curve: at 1080p, this combination is fully capable of maxing out the game, while at 4K, it falls well below playable thresholds. This analysis breaks down the measured frame rates, optimal settings, and how this specific CPU-GPU pairing stacks up against other tested configurations.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark results for this combination reveal a steep performance cliff as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates strong headroom across all presets. The Low preset yields an average of 121 FPS, while Medium delivers 93 FPS with a minimum of 79 FPS and a maximum of 107 FPS. High settings produce 80 FPS on average, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains a respectable 62 FPS. These figures indicate that the CPU-GPU pairing is well-balanced at this resolution, with the Intel Arc B570 providing sufficient throughput to keep the Core i9-14900K from being the limiting factor.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drop is significant but expected. The Low preset still manages 79 FPS, but Medium falls to 61 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 70 FPS. High settings dip further to 52 FPS, and Ultra drops to 41 FPS. The frame time consistency at Medium is notable, as the 52-70 FPS range suggests occasional dips below the 60 FPS threshold, but the average keeps the experience playable. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 30-35% performance across all presets, which aligns with the 77% increase in pixel count.
At 3840x2160, the combination struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The Low preset averages 44 FPS, which is the only setting that comes close to the 60 FPS target. Medium averages 33 FPS with a minimum of 28 FPS and a maximum of 39 FPS, while High drops to 29 FPS and Ultra falls to 22 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is notably larger than at lower resolutions, suggesting that the Arc B570's 10 GB memory bus and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth become increasingly strained as texture and shading complexity rises. The data shows no min or max values for most 4K presets, indicating that frame pacing is likely erratic enough to render those measurements unreliable.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 62 FPS. This is a rare outcome where every preset, from Low to Ultra, exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data confirms that users can enable the highest visual quality without compromise at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, which holds an average of 61 FPS. While the average clears the threshold, the minimum of 52 FPS indicates that demanding scenes may cause noticeable dips. Still, Medium represents the optimal balance, as High falls to 52 FPS and cannot be considered reliably playable. The Low preset also works at 79 FPS, but Medium offers a substantial visual upgrade for a modest frame rate cost.
For 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS target. The best average is 44 FPS at Low settings, which falls well short of the playable threshold. The verdict data lists no playable settings for this resolution, confirming that this combination is not suitable for 4K gaming in The Technomancer. Users would need to either reduce resolution or accept a significantly compromised experience.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 60 FPS on Ultra settings?
A: Only at 1920x1080, where the Ultra preset averages 62 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra drops to 41 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it falls to 22 FPS, making it unplayable at those resolutions.
Q: What is the best resolution-to-settings combination for this hardware?
A: The data shows 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is the highest quality playable configuration, achieving 62 FPS. For 1440p, Medium settings at 61 FPS is the best option, while 4K has no playable settings.
Q: How does the Arc B570 handle 1440p Medium compared to 1080p Medium?
A: At 1440p Medium, the average is 61 FPS with a 52-70 FPS range. At 1080p Medium, the average is 93 FPS with a 79-107 FPS range. The resolution increase costs about 34% performance.
Q: Is there any scenario where 4K is viable with this combo?
A: No. The highest 4K average is 44 FPS at Low settings, which is 16 FPS below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Even the least demanding preset cannot maintain playable frame rates.
Q: Does the Core i9-14900K bottleneck the Arc B570 in this game?
A: The benchmark data suggests no bottleneck at 1080p, where even Ultra settings exceed 60 FPS. The performance drop at higher resolutions is consistent with GPU limitations rather than CPU constraints, as the i9-14900K ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.
Q: What frame rate can users expect at 1080p High settings?
A: The measured average is 80 FPS, with no min or max recorded. This provides comfortable headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, making it a strong choice for users who want higher visual fidelity than Medium.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2972 out of 3696 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the 19.6th percentile of all configurations, meaning roughly 80% of tested systems perform better. The ranking reflects the GPU's limitations rather than the CPU's capabilities—the i9-14900K is a top-tier processor with an average benchmark score of 79097, but the Arc B570 sits at the 65th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 20556.
The low combo ranking is primarily driven by the GPU's 4K performance, where the system falls dramatically short of the playable threshold. At 1080p, the combo's performance would likely rank much higher, but the aggregate ranking across all resolutions drags it down. The data indicates that this pairing is heavily skewed toward 1080p gaming, with the Arc B570's 10 GB GDDR6 memory and 160-bit bus width proving insufficient for high-resolution rendering in this title.
Compared to other combos in the database, this system sits in the lower half, but the CPU's strength provides a solid foundation. Users with this pairing should focus on 1080p gameplay to get the most out of the hardware, as the GPU cannot sustain high frame rates at higher resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Intel Core i9-14900K has several near-identical rivals in terms of CPU benchmark scores. The Intel Core i9-14900KF scores 79371, a mere 0.3% higher, making it effectively interchangeable in gaming scenarios. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus scores 79574, 0.6% higher, while the AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80041, 1.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, which is 1.7% lower. Any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in The Technomancer when paired with the same GPU, as the game is unlikely to be CPU-bound at 1080p with this hardware.
For the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570's nearest rivals are close in synthetic benchmarks but show interesting variance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, just 0.1% higher, while the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.4% higher, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, 0.5% higher. Despite the similar average scores, real-world gaming performance could differ due to driver optimizations and architecture differences. The Arc A750 is particularly notable as a direct Intel sibling that might offer more mature drivers for this generation of games.
For users considering alternatives, the RTX 3070 Mobile would likely provide similar frame rates in The Technomancer, though its mobile nature means it may have thermal constraints. The Arc A750 represents the closest desktop equivalent, and its slightly higher score suggests marginally better performance. These alternatives would not change the fundamental conclusion: 1080p is playable at Ultra, 1440p is playable at Medium, and 4K is not viable.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc B570 can run The Technomancer effectively, but with strict resolution limitations. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on every preset, with Ultra achieving 62 FPS as the highest quality playable option. This is the sweet spot for this hardware, offering full visual fidelity without performance compromises.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable but with reduced settings. Medium is the best option, averaging 61 FPS, though the 52 FPS minimum means users should expect occasional stutters in busy scenes. Low settings provide a more stable 79 FPS for those who prioritize frame rate consistency over visual quality.
At 3840x2160, this combination fails to meet the 60 FPS threshold at any setting. The best case is 44 FPS at Low, which is 16 FPS short of playable. Users with 4K displays would need to lower the resolution to 1440p or accept an unplayable experience.
The verdict is clear: this PC is a capable 1080p gaming machine for The Technomancer, a decent 1440p system with settings compromises, and unsuitable for 4K. The Core i9-14900K provides ample CPU headroom, but the Arc B570's 10 GB memory and mid-range compute power define the boundaries of what this combo can achieve. For the best experience, stick to 1080p Ultra settings, where the system delivers smooth, consistent performance above the 60 FPS target.