Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
150 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
77 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
98 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
50 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
10.2ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 70,163
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 35 41 54
1440p QHD 50 64 75 98
1080p Full HD 77 98 115 150

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Low 150
1920x1080 Medium 115
1920x1080 Ultra 77
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Low 98
2560x1440 Medium 75
2560x1440 Ultra 50
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The Technomancer, an Action RPG from 2016, presents a demanding workload for modern hardware. The data for the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination provides a clear picture of its capabilities across common resolutions. This analysis examines the measured frame rates, contextualizes the performance against similar hardware, and determines the optimal settings for a fluid experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data reveals a performance profile that scales predictably with resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the combination demonstrates strong headroom, with an average of 150 FPS on Low settings. This drops to 115 FPS on Medium, with a minimum of 98 FPS and a maximum of 132 FPS, indicating a stable experience. High settings yield 98 FPS average, while Ultra settings still maintain a solid 77 FPS average, making the game highly playable at this resolution across the entire settings spectrum.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains robust but the impact of higher fidelity is more pronounced. The Low preset averages 98 FPS, which is identical to the High preset at 1920x1080, showcasing the resolution scaling. Medium settings produce an average of 75 FPS, with minimums of 64 FPS and maximums of 87 FPS, keeping the experience above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset averages 64 FPS, still comfortably playable. However, the Ultra preset dips to an average of 50 FPS, falling below the playable threshold and indicating a limit for this combination at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 5050 begins to struggle with this title. The Low preset averages 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings see the average drop to 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. High settings produce an average of 35 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages just 28 FPS. The data shows that no settings preset at 4K resolution achieves a playable frame rate for this game, marking a clear boundary for the hardware.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark scores place the Intel Core i7-14700KF in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70163. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, include the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, which is 0.2% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, which is 0.4% slower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.9% slower, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is 1% faster. These deltas are minimal, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios within The Technomancer, these processors would deliver nearly identical performance. The choice between them would not be a significant factor in frame rate outcomes for this game.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rivals are a mix of mobile and desktop parts. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 0.6% higher, while the AMD Radeon HD 8970M is 1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT is 1.6% slower, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.6% faster. These small percentage differences suggest that, in GPU-bound rendering scenarios, the frame rate output would be very similar among these options. For instance, at 3840x2160, where the GPU is the primary bottleneck, a system with an RTX A4000 Mobile would produce frame rates only marginally higher than the RTX 5050.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data provides a clear directive for optimizing the experience. At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 77 FPS. This allows for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, delivering an average of 64 FPS. This represents the optimal balance, as the Ultra preset falls to 50 FPS. For 3840x2160, the data shows no playable settings, but the closest option is the Low preset at 54 FPS, which still falls short of the 60 FPS target.

The Verdict

The benchmark results indicate that this PC configuration is capable of running The Technomancer effectively, but with important resolution-based limitations. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all presets, including Ultra at 77 FPS, making it an excellent experience for high-refresh-rate monitors. The gameplay is smooth and responsive, with no settings-related compromises needed. For 2560x1440, the system remains playable, with High settings averaging 64 FPS. Users seeking higher fidelity at this resolution would need to accept frame rates below 60 FPS, as Ultra averages only 50 FPS. The verdict is unequivocal at 3840x2160: the combination of the i7-14700KF and RTX 5050 cannot maintain a playable frame rate at any settings preset. The average FPS ranges from 28 on Ultra to 54 on Low, all below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Therefore, this PC is recommended for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it is not suited for 4K in this title.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable at 1920x1080?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 150 FPS on the Low settings preset.

Q: Can this system run The Technomancer at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 2560x1440?

A: No. The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 yields an average of 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440 that maintains at least 60 FPS?

A: The High settings preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS, with an average of 64 FPS.

Q: Which component is more likely to be the bottleneck at 3840x2160?

A: The data shows the GPU is the limiting factor, as the average frame rate drops from 54 FPS on Low to 28 FPS on Ultra, with no settings preset achieving a playable 60 FPS.

Q: Are there any playable settings at 3840x2160?

A: No. All settings presets at 3840x2160, including Low, produce an average frame rate below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the average frame rate on High settings at 1920x1080?

A: The High settings preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average frame rate of 98 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations for The Technomancer, the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination ranks 2269 out of 3696 tested combos. This places it in the lower half of all systems tested for this specific game. This ranking is a holistic measure of performance across all tested resolutions and settings. Given that the system cannot achieve 60 FPS at 4K and only reaches 64 FPS at 1440p on High, the mid-pack ranking is consistent with the measured data. The high percentile ranking of the CPU (94th) is offset by the more modest standing of the GPU (66th percentile), and the game's performance profile reflects that the GPU is the primary constraint on overall system rank.

CPU and GPU Roles

The distribution of frame rates across resolutions and presets reveals the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU in this game. At 1920x1080, the frame rate is exceptionally high, with the Low preset hitting 150 FPS and the Ultra preset still delivering 77 FPS. The scaling between presets at this resolution is significant, but even the most demanding settings are easily handled, suggesting that the CPU has ample headroom. The i7-14700KF, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is not a limiting factor here.

As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the frame rate drops across all presets, but the relative performance gap between presets narrows. The Low preset averages 98 FPS, while the High preset averages 64 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on more of the workload, but the CPU is still capable of feeding it with enough data to achieve playable results on the High preset. The drop to 50 FPS on Ultra at this resolution is a clear sign that the GPU is now the primary bottleneck.

The trend is unmistakable at 3840x2160. The frame rate plummets across all presets, with the Low preset averaging 54 FPS. The scaling between Low and Ultra (54 FPS to 28 FPS) is a direct consequence of the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth limitations at this high pixel count. The CPU's performance is largely irrelevant at this resolution, as the RTX 5050 cannot render frames fast enough to utilize the i7-14700KF's processing power. The data confirms that for The Technomancer, the GPU becomes the decisive component as resolution increases, while the CPU is sufficient to avoid being a bottleneck at 1080p and 1440p.