Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Technomancer
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 54 | 65 | 85 |
| 1440p QHD | 76 | 99 | 115 | 151 |
| 1080p Full HD | 121 | 152 | 179 | 235 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a wide range of performance in The Technomancer, scaling predictably with resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly fast, whereas at 3840x2160 it demands careful settings choices to stay above the 60 FPS threshold. The measured data shows a clear hierarchy: Low presets always produce the highest frame rates, while Ultra presets impose the heaviest load, with the gap between them widening as resolution increases.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system produces exceptional frame rates across all settings. The Low preset yields an average of 234.6 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this combination. Moving up the settings ladder, Medium delivers 179.2 FPS, High drops to 151.8 FPS, and Ultra still maintains a very strong 120.9 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 113.7 FPS, indicating that the GPU has ample headroom even under maximum load.
At 2560x1440, performance remains highly playable but begins to show the expected scaling pressure. Low averages 150.9 FPS, Medium produces 115.2 FPS, High hits 98.6 FPS, and Ultra settles at 75.8 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra here is 75.1 FPS, which is a smaller absolute gap than at 1080p, meaning the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as pixel count rises.
At 3840x2160, the curve steepens considerably. Low still manages a comfortable 85 FPS average, Medium drops to 65 FPS, High falls to 53.8 FPS, and Ultra dips below the playable threshold at 39.9 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 45.1 FPS, and critically, only Low and Medium clear the 60 FPS playable line. The step from Medium to High at 4K costs 11.2 FPS, which is a significant penalty for a single preset tier.
The data reveals that the RTX 4070 scales well with resolution but hits a wall at 4K Ultra. For users targeting 4K, the difference between Medium and High settings is the difference between a smooth 65 FPS and a stutter-prone 53.8 FPS. At 1440p and below, every preset is viable, with even Ultra staying well above the 60 FPS target.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run The Technomancer at 4K with playable frame rates?*
A: Yes, but only at Low or Medium settings. The measured averages are 85 FPS for Low and 65 FPS for Medium at 3840x2160. High settings drop to 53.8 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39.9 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, but Ultra is the best choice since it delivers a 75.8 FPS average. This is the highest quality setting that still maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.
Q: How much performance is lost when switching from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra?
A: The average frame rate drops from 120.9 FPS at 1920x1080 Ultra to 39.9 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra, a reduction of 81 FPS. This represents a 67% decrease in average frame rate, highlighting the GPU load at 4K.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck this game at high resolutions?
A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the primary constraint at 4K. The frame rate drops significantly between Medium (65 FPS) and Ultra (39.9 FPS) at 3840x2160, indicating that the RTX 4070's rendering limits are being reached. At 1080p, the high frame rates across all settings suggest the CPU is not a limiting factor.
Q: Does the Low preset provide a smoother experience than Medium at 4K?
A: Yes, Low averages 85 FPS compared to Medium's 65 FPS at 3840x2160. The 20 FPS difference is substantial, but both remain above the 60 FPS playable threshold, so the choice depends on whether visual fidelity or maximum smoothness is preferred.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between High and Ultra at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, High averages 98.6 FPS while Ultra averages 75.8 FPS. The 22.8 FPS gap shows that Ultra carries a notable performance cost, though both settings are fully playable.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions and presets indicates that the GPU is the dominant factor in The Technomancer for this combination. At 1920x1080, the system produces 234.6 FPS on Low and 120.9 FPS on Ultra, showing that even at maximum settings, the RTX 4070 has significant headroom. The CPU, with 20 cores and 28 threads, is unlikely to be a bottleneck at these frame rates, as the game's demands are met without issue.
When moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop proportionally across all presets. Low goes from 234.6 to 150.9 FPS, a 35.7% reduction, while Ultra goes from 120.9 to 75.8 FPS, a 37.3% reduction. This consistent scaling suggests that the GPU is handling the increased pixel load uniformly, with no sudden CPU-related dips. The i7-14700KF's single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6235, is more than sufficient for this game's logic.
At 3840x2160, the GPU role becomes even more pronounced. The frame rate drops from 85 FPS on Low to 39.9 FPS on Ultra, a 53% reduction. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are being pushed to their limits. The CPU's role diminishes further, as the frame rate is dictated by the GPU's rendering throughput rather than any processing bottleneck.
The preset scaling also tells a clear story. At 4K, the difference between Medium and High is 11.2 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is 13.9 FPS. These increments are relatively small, indicating that the GPU is struggling to maintain the higher settings. In contrast, at 1080p, the difference between Medium and High is 27.4 FPS, showing that the GPU has ample capacity to handle the increased workload without significant frame rate penalties. This pattern confirms that the RTX 4070 is the definitive performance limiter at higher resolutions, while the i7-14700KF provides a stable foundation that never impedes the game's performance.
The Verdict
This PC can run The Technomancer with playable frame rates at all tested resolutions, provided the settings are chosen appropriately. At 1920x1080, every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with ease, and the best experience is Ultra at 120.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets are also playable, with Ultra delivering 75.8 FPS as the best option. The system is fully capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at these resolutions.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The playable settings are Low (85 FPS) and Medium (65 FPS), both of which exceed the 60 FPS requirement. High falls short at 53.8 FPS, and Ultra is not playable at 39.9 FPS. The best settings for 4K are Medium, which offers a solid 65 FPS average while maintaining a reasonable visual quality. For users who prioritize frame rate above all else, Low at 85 FPS provides a significant margin of safety. The data clearly shows that 4K Ultra is out of reach for this combination, but 4K gaming is still viable with a modest settings compromise.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores are all within a narrow performance band. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has an average score of 69996, which is 0.2% lower than the i7-14700KF's score of 70163. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875, a 0.4% deficit, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, a 0.9% deficit. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is the only rival that scores higher, at 70879, which is 1% above the i7-14700KF. For The Technomancer, any of these CPUs would provide nearly identical performance, as the game is not heavily CPU-dependent at the tested settings.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4070's closest rivals are also tightly clustered. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 has an average score of 37628, just 0.1% lower than the RTX 4070's 37648. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, a 0.4% deficit, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, a 1.3% deficit. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher. In practical terms, swapping to any of these GPUs would result in frame rate differences of only a few FPS in The Technomancer. The RX Vega 56, despite being an older architecture, would deliver nearly identical 4K Medium performance at around 65 FPS, while the RTX 4080 Mobile might push 4K High closer to the 60 FPS line.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination ranks 927th out of 3696 tested combos in The Technomancer. This places it in the upper quartile of all systems tested, meaning it outperforms roughly 75% of other combinations. The ranking reflects the balanced nature of this pairing: the CPU is in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 81st percentile of all GPUs.
The combo's position is notable because it demonstrates that a strong CPU paired with a mid-range to upper-mid-range GPU can achieve a high ranking in a game that is primarily GPU-bound. Systems with weaker GPUs but similar CPUs would likely rank lower, while systems with stronger GPUs but weaker CPUs might not see a proportional improvement due to potential CPU bottlenecks. The 927th rank out of 3696 is a solid result, indicating that this configuration delivers consistent, predictable performance across the board, with no single component dragging down the overall experience. For a game like The Technomancer, this ranking suggests that the system is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K playable at reduced settings.