Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

90%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
180 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
92 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
60 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
65 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
33 FPS
8.5ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 35,287
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 42 50 65
1440p QHD 60 77 90 118
1080p Full HD 92 118 138 180

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 118
1920x1080 Low 180
1920x1080 Medium 138
1920x1080 Ultra 92
2560x1440 High 77
2560x1440 Low 118
2560x1440 Medium 90
2560x1440 Ultra 60
3840x2160 High 42
3840x2160 Low 65
3840x2160 Medium 50
3840x2160 Ultra 33

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for modern hardware, particularly at higher resolutions. The data for the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination shows a clear performance hierarchy across settings, with the system's capabilities scaling predictably from 1080p to 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data for this configuration reveals a wide performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates across all presets. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 180, providing an incredibly smooth experience. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 138 FPS, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 118 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra setting still maintains a very playable 92 FPS average. This indicates that at 1080p, the combo is never stressed, offering headroom for high-refresh-rate displays even on maximum quality.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the expected impact of increased pixel count. The Low preset averages 118 FPS, which is still excellent. Medium settings deliver an average of 90 FPS, with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 104 FPS. The High preset produces a 77 FPS average, maintaining fluid gameplay. The Ultra setting sits precisely at the 60 FPS playable threshold, averaging exactly 60 FPS. This shows that 1440p Ultra is the boundary for this hardware, providing a stable but not excessive frame rate.

The most challenging scenario is 3840x2160 (4K). Here, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates with higher quality settings. The Ultra preset averages only 33 FPS, which is not playable. High settings improve this to 42 FPS, still below the playable threshold. Medium settings provide an average of 50 FPS, with a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 57 FPS, which is borderline. Only the Low preset achieves a playable result, averaging 65 FPS. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming requires significant compromises on visual quality for this specific CPU and GPU pairing.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 holds a rank of 1648 out of 3696 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all possible configurations. It is important to note that this ranking is specific to this game and its engine, as performance can vary significantly across different titles. The rank suggests that while this is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it is more capable than the majority of systems tested, primarily due to the strong CPU. The GPU, while modern, is positioned in the mid-range segment, which is reflected in its overall percentile of 72 against all GPUs.

The disparity in component strength is notable. The CPU has a percentile rank of 84 against all CPUs, indicating it is a high-performance processor. The GPU's percentile of 72 shows it is a solid performer but not at the same relative level as the CPU. This imbalance means the system's overall rank is likely held back by the GPU, especially in scenarios that are heavily graphics-bound.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate a shifting bottleneck between the CPU and GPU depending on the resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across all presets. The difference between Low (180 FPS) and Ultra (92 FPS) is substantial, showing that the GPU is being utilized more heavily as settings increase. However, even at Ultra, the GPU is able to produce 92 FPS, suggesting the CPU is capable of feeding it enough data. The high scores in the CPU's benchmarks, such as its 19784 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core, support its ability to handle the game's logic and physics at this resolution without becoming the primary limiter.

At 2560x1440, the workload shifts more towards the GPU. The scaling from Low (118 FPS) to Ultra (60 FPS) shows a clear performance cost for higher fidelity. The fact that Ultra lands exactly at the 60 FPS threshold indicates that the GPU is now the primary constraint, as the CPU has enough headroom to process the frame data but the GPU cannot render it any faster. The CPU's role becomes less critical here; its strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 1850.5 score in Cinebench R23 single-core, ensures it is not a bottleneck.

The GPU's dominance is most apparent at 3840x2160. The performance drop is severe, with Ultra yielding only 33 FPS. Even the Medium preset, which averages 50 FPS, shows the GPU is struggling to fill the massive number of pixels. The CPU's influence here is minimal; the game is entirely bound by the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth. The RTX 5060's 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth and 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are insufficient for 4K Ultra in this title. The data shows that for this game, the GPU is the deciding factor for high-resolution performance, while the CPU ensures the system can hit high frame rates at lower resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rivals in the benchmark database, there are several hardware options that would deliver comparable performance to this combination.

For the CPU, the data shows a cluster of processors with nearly identical average benchmark scores. The Intel Core i5-13600T has an average score of 35305, which is a -0.1% delta from the i7-12700K's 35287. Similarly, the Intel Core i7-12700KF (score 35365, delta -0.2%) and the Intel Core i7-13700T (score 35403, delta -0.3%) are all within a fraction of a percent in overall performance. This means that in a CPU-bound scenario, a user would see virtually no difference between these processors. The Intel Core 5 213PE (score 35428, delta -0.4%) is also a very close match. Any of these CPUs would behave nearly identically to the i7-12700K in The Technomancer, as their compute capabilities are essentially equivalent.

On the GPU side, the closest rivals show a more interesting mix. The AMD Radeon 860M has an average score of 26401, a -0.3% delta from the RTX 5060's 26331. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (score 26421, delta -0.3%) is also a near-identical match in synthetic benchmarks. This is notable, as it suggests that despite being a dedicated desktop card, the RTX 5060's performance in these tests is on par with an integrated solution and a low-end mobile GPU. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (score 26553, delta -0.8%) is slightly faster, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (score 26011, delta 1.2%) is slightly slower. For The Technomancer, any of these GPUs would produce frame rates within a few FPS of the RTX 5060, meaning the gaming experience would be similar, especially at 1440p where the GPU is the limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings, where it averages 65 FPS. Higher settings at 3840x2160 result in unplayable frame rates, with Medium averaging 50 FPS and Ultra averaging 33 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable. The Ultra preset provides an average of 60 FPS, which is exactly at the playable threshold. This is the best visual quality that still maintains a playable frame rate.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its direct rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700K's average benchmark score of 35287 is virtually identical to its nearest rivals. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305 (-0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365 (-0.2% delta). Performance differences would be negligible.

Q: Is the GPU performance comparable to other graphics cards?

A: Yes, the RTX 5060's average score of 26331 is very close to the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, -0.3% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.3% delta). The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is slightly slower with a 1.2% positive delta, meaning the RTX 5060 is a bit faster.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the difference is significant. The Low preset averages 180 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 92 FPS. This represents a large performance cost for the higher visual fidelity.

Q: What is the frame rate stability like at Medium settings?

A: The data includes minimum and maximum FPS for Medium settings. At 1920x1080, the frame rate ranges from 117 FPS to 159 FPS. At 2560x1440, it ranges from 77 FPS to 104 FPS. At 3840x2160, it ranges from 42 FPS to 57 FPS.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination is a capable gaming system for The Technomancer, but its capabilities are clearly defined by resolution. At 1920x1080, the answer is a definitive yes. The system can run the game at the highest Ultra preset with an average of 92 FPS, far exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold. All settings are playable, and the system offers excellent performance.

At 2560x1440, the system remains fully playable. All four presets, including Ultra, achieve an average of 60 FPS or higher. This resolution is the sweet spot for this hardware, allowing gamers to experience the game at maximum quality while maintaining smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the system is only partially playable. The only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold is Low, which averages 65 FPS. While this is technically playable, it requires a significant reduction in visual quality. The Medium preset, which averages 50 FPS, does not meet the playability standard, and the High and Ultra presets are too demanding. For a 4K experience, this hardware is insufficient for anything above low settings. The verdict is that this PC can run the game, but a 1440p monitor is recommended to fully utilize its potential without sacrificing visual fidelity.