Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

81%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
150 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
77 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
98 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
50 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
10.2ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 35,287
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 35 41 54
1440p QHD 50 64 75 98
1080p Full HD 77 98 115 150

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Low 150
1920x1080 Medium 115
1920x1080 Ultra 77
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Low 98
2560x1440 Medium 75
2560x1440 Ultra 50
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for modern hardware, and the combination of the Intel Core i7-12700K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 yields a clear, if uneven, performance picture. Benchmark data shows this pairing is capable of delivering smooth gameplay at mainstream resolutions, but it struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K. The measured results, derived from the FACT PACK, provide a precise breakdown of what this system can achieve across different settings and resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo reveal a steep performance curve as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the system is clearly in its element. With Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 150 FPS, indicating a massive headroom over the 60 FPS playable threshold. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 115 FPS, with a minimum of 98 FPS and a maximum of 132 FPS, still providing a very smooth experience. High settings at 1080p yield an average of 98 FPS, which remains highly playable. Even the most demanding Ultra preset at this resolution maintains an average of 77 FPS, which is well above the playable threshold. This indicates that at 1080p, the RTX 5050 and i7-12700K combination has ample performance for high-refresh-rate monitors on most presets, with the exception of pushing beyond 144 Hz on Ultra.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. Low settings produce an average of 98 FPS, which is still very smooth. Medium settings drop to an average of 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 87 FPS. This is a solidly playable experience, with the minimum frame rate just barely clearing the 60 FPS threshold. High settings at 1440p average 64 FPS, which is right at the edge of playability; the data shows it is considered playable, but there is little margin for error in demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls to an average of 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This shows a clear division: the system can handle 1440p well on Medium and High, but Ultra is too demanding.

The 3840x2160 results show a significant challenge for this hardware. At Low settings, the average frame rate is 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. Medium settings average 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. High settings drop further to an average of 35 FPS. Ultra settings are the most demanding, yielding an average of only 28 FPS. These numbers are all below the playable threshold, indicating that 4K gaming is not a viable option for this combination, regardless of the preset chosen.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark database places this specific CPU and GPU combo in a broader context of similar-performing hardware. For the Intel Core i7-12700K, the nearest rivals are extremely close in overall benchmark scores. The Intel Core i5-13600T has an average score of 35305, which is a delta of -0.1 percent from the i7-12700K’s average benchmark score of 35287. This means the two processors are effectively identical in overall performance for this type of workload. Similarly, the Intel Core i7-12700KF averages 35365, a delta of -0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i7-13700T averages 35403, a delta of -0.3 percent. The Intel Core 5 213PE rounds out the rivals with an average score of 35428, a delta of -0.4 percent. These sub-one-percent differences indicate that for gaming, any of these CPUs would be a near-perfect substitute for the i7-12700K in terms of overall processing power.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 has a more varied set of nearest rivals. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL has an average score of 21153, which is -0.6 percent from the RTX 5050’s average benchmark score of 21035. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M averages 21237, a delta of -1.0 percent. More interesting is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which scores 20713, a delta of +1.6 percent, meaning the RTX 5050 is actually slightly ahead of this rival in the aggregate benchmarks. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile averages 21379, a delta of -1.6 percent. These comparisons show that in terms of raw compute, the RTX 5050 sits in a performance class that includes both older mobile GPUs and desktop parts from a previous generation. Users with any of these GPUs would likely see similar frame rates in The Technomancer, assuming the CPU is not a bottleneck.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate a clear shift in component importance as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the data shows very high frame rates across all presets, with the Low preset hitting 150 FPS and even Ultra maintaining 77 FPS. This suggests that the game is not heavily constrained by the GPU at this resolution, and the CPU, with its 12 cores and 20 threads, provides ample processing power to feed the graphics card. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is from 150 FPS down to 77 FPS, a roughly 49 percent drop, which shows the increasing load on the GPU as settings rise, but the absolute performance remains high.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to play a more significant role. The frame rates from Low to High scale from 98 FPS down to 64 FPS, and then a steep drop to 50 FPS on Ultra. The fact that the average frame rate at High is only slightly above the playable threshold suggests that the GPU is becoming the primary limiting factor. The CPU’s role is likely still important to maintain the minimum frame rates, which the data shows at 64 FPS for Medium and 98 FPS for Low, but the overall trend is driven by the GPU’s rendering load.

The 3840x2160 results make the GPU the definitive bottleneck. All presets fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold, with Low averaging 54 FPS and Ultra averaging just 28 FPS. This significant drop from 1440p to 4K, even at Low settings, is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The CPU, which is likely not fully utilized at these lower frame rates, cannot compensate for the sheer number of pixels the RTX 5050 must process. The scaling between resolutions shows this clearly: at 1080p Low, the system hits 150 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 54 FPS, a 64 percent reduction. This is a direct consequence of the GPU’s workload increasing with pixel count, rather than any CPU limitation.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 60 FPS on a 1920x1080 monitor?

A: Yes, the data shows that at 1920x1080, all tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—produce average frame rates above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The lowest average is 77 FPS on Ultra, which is still comfortably playable.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440 that maintains 60 FPS?

A: The verdict data lists High as the best playable setting at 2560x1440, with an average of 64 FPS. Medium also maintains playability with 75 FPS average, but High is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with the RTX 5050 and i7-12700K in this game?

A: No, the measured data shows that at 3840x2160, every preset—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average is 54 FPS on Low, which is below 60 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT in this game?

A: The nearestRivals data shows the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT has an average benchmark score of 20713, while the RTX 5050 scores 21035. This is a delta of +1.6 percent, meaning the RTX 5050 is slightly faster in aggregate benchmarks, so you would expect similar or slightly better frame rates in The Technomancer.

Q: What is the average FPS on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: The measured data lists an average of 77 FPS for the Ultra preset at 1920x1080. This is the most demanding preset at this resolution and still clears the playable threshold.

Q: Are there any settings at 3840x2160 that are considered playable?

A: No, the verdictByResolution data for 3840x2160 lists an empty array for playableSettings, indicating that no preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold at this resolution.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run The Technomancer has a nuanced answer that depends entirely on resolution. The verdictByResolution data is definitive. At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings; the system fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold on any preset, with the best average being 54 FPS on Low. This combination is not suited for 4K gaming in this title. At 2560x1440, the system is playable on High, Low, and Medium settings. The best playable preset is High, which achieves an average of 64 FPS, just above the 60 FPS line. For a more comfortable margin, Medium settings provide an average of 75 FPS. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable. All four presets—Ultra, High, Medium, and Low—are playable, with the best being Ultra at an average of 77 FPS. This means for 1080p gaming, the user has full freedom to choose any visual preset and expect a smooth experience. For 1440p, the system is capable but requires some compromise on settings to maintain a 60 FPS average. For 4K, the verdict is clear: this hardware is not sufficient.

Best Settings per Resolution

For users seeking the best visual quality while maintaining a playable frame rate, the data provides a clear guide. At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average frame rate of 77 FPS. This is the optimal choice for maximum fidelity without sacrificing playability. At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS is High, with an average of 64 FPS. This setting provides a good balance between visual quality and performance, though the margin above 60 FPS is thin. At 3840x2160, no preset meets the 60 FPS threshold, so there is no recommended setting. The highest average is 54 FPS on Low, but it still falls short of playable. Users targeting 4K would need to consider lower resolutions or different hardware.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination is ranked 2269 out of 3696 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places the system in the lower half of the database’s tested configurations. The percentile data for the individual components shows the CPU is in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a high-performing processor. The GPU, however, is only in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, which is a more mid-range position. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU results in a system that is often limited by graphics performance, especially at higher resolutions. This ranking reflects the reality that while the CPU has significant headroom, the RTX 5050 is the constraining factor for this specific game, preventing the system from reaching the higher tiers of performance seen with more powerful graphics cards. The rank of 2269 out of 3696 suggests that for The Technomancer, there are many other tested combinations that deliver better overall frame rates, particularly those with more powerful GPUs. This is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows the system excels at 1080p but falls short at higher resolutions.