Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Technomancer
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 46 | 58 | 71 | 91 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 107 | 125 | 164 |
| 1080p Full HD | 131 | 166 | 193 | 249 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination delivers a remarkably strong performance profile for The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG. Benchmark data shows this pairing handles the game with high frame rates across most settings, though the demanding 4K Ultra preset presents a notable challenge. The measured results indicate a system that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides ample headroom at lower settings.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest playable setting at 4K resolution with this combo?
A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the highest playable setting, achieving an average of 70.5 FPS. The High preset drops to 57.9 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Can this PC handle 1440p at maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 82 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32,279. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, scores 32,233, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.2% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% ahead.
Q: What is the performance gap between the GPU and its closest competitor?
A: The RTX 5070's average benchmark score is 40,377. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40,318 (0.1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 0.8% behind. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile trails by 2%.
Q: Is the 1080p Low preset the fastest configuration tested?
A: Yes, the 1920x1080 Low preset produces the highest average frame rate at 249 FPS. The Medium preset follows at 193.2 FPS, and the High preset reaches 166.2 FPS.
Q: What is the overall ranking of this combo among tested configurations?
A: This CPU and GPU combination ranks 684th out of 3,696 total combos tested for this game, placing it in the top percentile of systems analyzed.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the most demanding configuration that maintains 60 FPS or higher, averaging 70.5 FPS. The High preset falls short at 57.9 FPS, and Ultra drops further to 46 FPS. Low settings reach 91.2 FPS, but Medium provides the best visual quality while staying above the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is fully playable with an average of 82 FPS. This is the most demanding option at this resolution and delivers a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS floor. The High preset reaches 107.3 FPS, Medium hits 124.7 FPS, and Low achieves 163.9 FPS.
At 1920x1080, all settings are playable, with Ultra averaging 131 FPS. This is the highest settings option that clears the threshold. High runs at 166.2 FPS, Medium at 193.2 FPS, and Low produces 249 FPS. The data shows 1080p Ultra is the recommended choice for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling between resolutions reveals a clear GPU-bound pattern. At 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with the Low preset reaching 249 FPS. This suggests the RTX 5070 has significant headroom at lower resolutions, and the i5-14400F is capable of feeding the GPU without becoming a bottleneck.
Moving to 1440p, frame rates drop by roughly 30-35% across presets. For example, Ultra falls from 131 FPS at 1080p to 82 FPS at 1440p. This reduction is consistent with the GPU handling more pixels, indicating the graphics card is the limiting factor at this resolution.
At 4K, the drop becomes more pronounced. The High preset falls from 107.3 FPS at 1440p to 57.9 FPS at 4K, a 46% reduction. The Ultra preset drops from 82 FPS to 46 FPS, a 44% decline. These substantial decreases confirm that the RTX 5070's rendering throughput is the primary constraint at 4K.
The CPU's role is most evident at 1080p Low, where the 249 FPS result shows the processor can drive very high frame rates. The i5-14400F's single-thread performance, indicated by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,055, is sufficient for this game's engine. At higher resolutions, the GPU workload increases proportionally, and the CPU becomes less relevant to overall performance.
How This Combo Ranks
This configuration ranks 684th out of 3,696 tested combos, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all systems analyzed. This position reflects a strong balance between the CPU and GPU for this title. The rank suggests that while many high-end systems outperform it, this combo sits comfortably above the median, particularly for a game from 2016.
The GPU's percentile ranking of 82 versus all GPUs, combined with the CPU's 83rd percentile, indicates both components are well-matched for this workload. The data implies the system is not held back by a weak link, which is consistent with the smooth scaling observed across resolutions. The 684th rank out of nearly 3,700 combos means a substantial majority of tested configurations are slower for The Technomancer.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals provide insight into comparable processing power. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores within 0.1% of the i5-14400F, meaning systems using that processor would deliver nearly identical in-game performance. The Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.2% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% faster. The Intel Core i7-12800H is 0.5% faster, which would result in a negligible real-world difference.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon Pro 580 is the closest match, with a 0.1% score difference. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 0.8% slower, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 1.2% faster. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile trails by 2%, which could translate to a few frames per second in demanding scenes. For practical purposes, any of these alternatives would produce similar frame rates to the RTX 5070 in The Technomancer.
The Verdict
This PC can run The Technomancer at playable frame rates across most configurations. At 1920x1080, all presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset delivering 131 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is playable at 82 FPS, and all lower presets exceed 100 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the best playable option at 70.5 FPS, while the High preset falls just below the threshold at 57.9 FPS.
The data indicates this system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p and below. For 4K gaming, users should select Medium settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended, as the 46 FPS average falls well below the playable threshold. Overall, this combo offers excellent performance for the game, with the only limitation being the most demanding 4K settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high. The Low preset averages 249 FPS, the Medium preset averages 193.2 FPS, the High preset averages 166.2 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 131 FPS. No minimum or maximum frame rate values were recorded for these tests.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. The Low preset reaches 163.9 FPS, Medium averages 124.7 FPS, High averages 107.3 FPS, and Ultra averages 82 FPS. All settings maintain a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 3840x2160, the results show more variation. The Low preset averages 91.2 FPS, Medium averages 70.5 FPS, High averages 57.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 46 FPS. Only the Low and Medium presets achieve playable frame rates at this resolution, with High and Ultra falling below the 60 FPS threshold.