Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
150 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
77 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
98 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
50 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
10.2ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 35 41 54
1440p QHD 50 64 75 98
1080p Full HD 77 98 115 150

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Low 150
1920x1080 Medium 115
1920x1080 Ultra 77
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Low 98
2560x1440 Medium 75
2560x1440 Ultra 50
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 form a modern desktop pairing aimed squarely at 1080p and 1440p gaming. Benchmark data for The Technomancer shows this combo handles the game’s older Action RPG engine with clear headroom at lower resolutions, but it hits a firm wall at 4K. The measured FPS numbers reveal a pattern: at 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS playable threshold, while at 2560x1440, only the Ultra preset falls short. At 3840x2160, no settings achieve 60 FPS, and the average frame rates drop into the 28-54 range depending on quality level. The data suggests this is a capable 1080p Ultra and 1440p High machine, with 4K reserved for those willing to compromise heavily.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets: Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 150 FPS, Medium averages 115 FPS with a minimum of 98 and a maximum of 132, High averages 98 FPS, and even Ultra holds an average of 77 FPS. Every single 1080p preset stays above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with the gap between Low and Ultra being 73 FPS — a substantial spread that shows the GPU has plenty of reserve capacity at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably but remain mostly playable. Low settings average 98 FPS, Medium averages 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 and a maximum of 87, and High averages 64 FPS. The 1440p Ultra preset drops to an average of 50 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The pattern here is that the step from High to Ultra costs 14 FPS on average, while the step from Medium to High costs 11 FPS. The minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium is 64, which barely clears the playable bar, suggesting that even in demanding scenes this pairing can hold its ground at Medium and High.

At 3840x2160, the story changes completely. Low settings average 54 FPS, Medium averages 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48, High averages 35 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. No 4K preset reaches 60 FPS, and the best case — Low settings — still falls 6 FPS short of the playable threshold. The delta between 1080p Low and 4K Low is 96 FPS, a massive drop that indicates the RTX 5050’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth become a limiting factor at 4K. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium (35 FPS) is the lowest recorded value across all tested configurations, which would produce noticeable stutter in combat-heavy scenes.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i5-14400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s role becomes more prominent because the GPU has enough headroom to push very high frame rates. The i5-14400F, with 10 cores, 16 threads, and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. At 1080p Low, where the average is 150 FPS, the CPU must feed frames quickly enough to keep the GPU saturated — and the benchmark results indicate it does so without bottlenecking, since the frame rate scales linearly from Low to Ultra.

At 2560x1440, the GPU starts to take on more responsibility. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings shows a drop from 98 FPS to 64 FPS, a 35% reduction that aligns with the increased pixel count. The CPU’s multi-core strength becomes less critical here, because the RTX 5050’s shading units (2560) and texture rate (205.8 GTexel/s) are working harder to fill the larger frame buffer. The 1440p Medium minimum of 64 FPS suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in heavier scenes, as the CPU has ample single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 3701) to handle game logic.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The average FPS at 4K High (35) is less than half of the 1080p High average (98), and the 4K Ultra average (28) is the lowest of any tested configuration. The RTX 5050’s FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s are simply insufficient for 4K rendering in this game. The CPU’s contribution at 4K is minimal — even at 4K Low, where the GPU is least stressed, the average of 54 FPS shows the GPU cannot reach the 60 FPS threshold regardless of CPU headroom. The scaling between presets at 4K (Low 54 → Medium 41 → High 35 → Ultra 28) is nearly linear, which is typical of GPU-bound scenarios.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS are Ultra, with an average of 77 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and the combo clears the playable threshold by 17 FPS. The data shows no reason to drop below Ultra at 1080p, as even the heaviest settings leave enough margin for dips.

For 2560x1440, the best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS are High, with an average of 64 FPS. This preset clears the threshold by just 4 FPS, so while it is technically playable, the margin is slim. The 1440p Medium preset averages 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS, which provides a safer buffer for demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 50 FPS and is not playable.

For 3840x2160, no settings achieve 60 FPS. The best average is 54 FPS at Low settings, which falls 6 FPS short of the playable threshold. The verdict data confirms this: the playable settings list for 4K is empty, and the best settings field is null. Users targeting 4K must either accept sub-60 FPS performance or reduce resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run The Technomancer at 1080p Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 Ultra is 77 FPS, which is 17 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict by resolution confirms Ultra is listed among the playable settings at 1080p.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 1440p?

A: The best playable preset at 2560x1440 is High, with an average of 64 FPS. Medium also qualifies with an average of 75 FPS and a minimum of 64 FPS, but High offers the highest visual quality that remains playable.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 54 at Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict data lists no playable settings at 4K.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, scores 21153, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713, which is 1.6% lower. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, which is 1.6% higher.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?

A: The data does not indicate CPU bottlenecking. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 150 FPS, which is the highest measured average, and the i5-14400F’s single-core score of 3055 in Cinebench R23 places it in the 83rd percentile. The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K follows a GPU-bound pattern.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 2269 out of 3696 tested combinations for The Technomancer, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32233, a 0.1% difference, meaning it would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in The Technomancer. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, a 0.2% difference, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32354, a -0.2% difference. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, a 0.5% difference. Any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 5050 would produce similar frame rates at all resolutions, since the game is GPU-bound at 1440p and 4K.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 21153, a -0.6% difference, making it a near-identical performer. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237, a -1% difference, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, a -1.6% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713, a 1.6% difference. All of these GPUs would produce FPS numbers within a few frames of the RTX 5050 at each resolution and preset, meaning a system with any of these GPUs and the i5-14400F would show the same playable settings at 1080p and 1440p, and the same lack of playable settings at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination ranks 2269 out of 3696 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the 38.6th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 61% of tested combos perform better. However, this rank reflects the entire spectrum of tested hardware, including high-end CPUs and GPUs that far exceed this pairing’s capabilities. The measured FPS data shows that despite the middling rank, the combo still delivers playable performance at 1080p and 1440p — the rank is dragged down by the 4K results, where the RTX 5050’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus width are insufficient. At 1080p, the combo’s 77 FPS Ultra result is competitive with systems ranked much higher, because the game’s engine is not particularly demanding by modern standards. The rank of 2269 is a holistic measure across all resolutions, but the per-resolution verdicts reveal a more nuanced picture: 1080p Ultra and 1440p High are both playable.

The Verdict

This PC can run The Technomancer, but the experience depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the combo runs every preset — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — at or above 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 77 FPS. This is the ideal resolution for this pairing, offering full visual fidelity without performance concerns. At 2560x1440, the combo runs High at 64 FPS and Medium at 75 FPS, but Ultra drops to 50 FPS and is not playable. The best 1440p experience is High, with a slim 4 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the combo cannot reach 60 FPS at any preset; the best case is Low at 54 FPS, which falls short. The verdict by resolution confirms this: 1080p has four playable settings, 1440p has three playable settings, and 4K has none. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p, this is a solid combination for The Technomancer. For 4K, it is not sufficient, and the data suggests lowering resolution or accepting sub-60 FPS frame rates is the only option.