Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Technomancer
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 70 | 82 | 107 |
| 1440p QHD | 100 | 128 | 149 | 195 |
| 1080p Full HD | 152 | 195 | 229 | 262 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System
The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers playable performance in The Technomancer at 1080p and 1440p across all four settings presets, and at 4K up to High settings. The only configuration that fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold is 4K Ultra, which averages 55 FPS. This system ranks 291st out of 3,696 tested CPU/GPU combinations for the game, placing it in the top 8% of all tested rigs.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The i5-13400F's average benchmark score of 25,292 places it within a fraction of a percent of its nearest CPU rivals. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25,284 (deltaPct 0), the Intel Core 5 120 scores 25,362 (-0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25,365 (-0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25,201 (0.4%). In synthetic tests, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical throughput, and in The Technomancer the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor at any resolution. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration with a 4.60 GHz boost clock and 20 MB of shared L3 cache provides ample headroom for the game's 2016-era engine, as evidenced by the high frame rates even on Low presets.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4080's average benchmark score of 54,247 is similarly close to its nearest rivals. The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209 (deltaPct 0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828 (-1.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698 (-2.6%), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757 (-2.7%). The RTX 4080 sits within 2.7% of all four alternatives, meaning a system with any of these GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in The Technomancer. The 16 GB GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for the game's texture and geometry loads, as the measured FPS shows no signs of memory starvation even at 4K.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU shifts across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the average frame rate scales from 262 FPS on Low to 152 FPS on Ultra, a drop of 110 FPS (42%). At 2560x1440, the range is 195 FPS on Low to 100 FPS on Ultra, a drop of 95 FPS (49%). At 3840x2160, the range is 107 FPS on Low to 55 FPS on Ultra, a drop of 52 FPS (49%). The relative scaling is nearly identical across resolutions, indicating that the GPU is the primary driver of performance changes when settings are adjusted. The CPU's contribution is consistent: at every resolution, the Low preset produces frame rates that are more than double the Ultra preset at the same resolution, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound scaling.
The i5-13400F's synthetic scores support this interpretation. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,604 and single-core score of 3,191 place it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, and its Passmark multithread score of 25,032 is among the highest in its class. For a game released in 2016, the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide far more compute than the engine can consume, so even at 1080p Low (262 FPS) the processor is not the bottleneck. The GPU, with its 9,728 shading units and 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, is the component that determines how the game responds to resolution and preset changes. At 4K Ultra, the GPU's workload exceeds its capability, dropping the average to 55 FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, which delivers 70 FPS. Medium runs at 82 FPS, and Low at 107 FPS, but High is the highest playable preset. Ultra falls to 55 FPS, below the threshold.
At 2560x1440, all four presets clear 60 FPS. The highest playable preset is Ultra, with an average of 100 FPS. High runs at 128 FPS, Medium at 149 FPS, and Low at 195 FPS.
At 1920x1080, every preset exceeds 60 FPS by a wide margin. Ultra is the best playable setting, averaging 152 FPS. High averages 195 FPS, Medium 229 FPS, and Low 262 FPS.
The Verdict
This system can run The Technomancer at 1080p and 1440p with all settings maxed out, and at 4K with High settings. The verdict data confirms: at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best at 70 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four settings are playable, and Ultra is the best at 100 FPS. At 1920x1080, all four settings are playable, with Ultra at 152 FPS. The only failure point is 4K Ultra, which averages 55 FPS and cannot sustain 60 FPS. For players who prioritize resolution over quality, High at 4K offers a smooth experience; for those who want maximum visual fidelity, 1440p Ultra provides a 100 FPS average with no compromise.
Measured FPS Breakdown
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |
|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|
| 3840x2160 | High | 70 | — | — |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 107 | — | — |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 82 | 70 | 94 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 55 | — | — |
| 2560x1440 | High | 128 | — | — |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 195 | — | — |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 149 | 127 | 172 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 100 | — | — |
| 1920x1080 | High | 195 | — | — |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 262 | — | — |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 229 | 194 | 263 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 152 | — | — |
The Medium preset at each resolution is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum frame times. At 1080p Medium, the frame rate ranges from 194 to 263 FPS, indicating very stable performance. At 1440p Medium, the range is 127–172 FPS, and at 4K Medium, it is 70–94 FPS. These narrow ranges suggest the system maintains consistent frame pacing without severe dips, even under load.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?
A: The average frame rate is 152 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: Can the system run the game at 4K with High settings?
A: Yes, High settings at 3840x2160 average 70 FPS, making it the best playable preset at that resolution.
Q: Which preset at 4K fails to reach 60 FPS?
A: Ultra at 3840x2160 averages 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The i5-13400F's average benchmark score of 25,292 is within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25,201) and within 0.3% of the Intel Core 5 120 (25,362) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25,365).
Q: What is the highest playable preset at 2560x1440?
A: Ultra is playable, with an average of 100 FPS, making it the best setting at that resolution.
Q: How many total CPU/GPU combinations were tested for this game?
A: The system ranks 291st out of 3,696 tested combinations, placing it in the top 8% of all tested configurations.