Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

65%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
191 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
98 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
125 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
64 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
69 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
35 FPS
8ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 27,799
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 17,208

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 45 53 69
1440p QHD 64 82 96 125
1080p Full HD 98 125 147 191

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 125
1920x1080 Low 191
1920x1080 Medium 147
1920x1080 Ultra 98
2560x1440 High 82
2560x1440 Low 125
2560x1440 Medium 96
2560x1440 Ultra 64
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 53
3840x2160 Ultra 35

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers a clear, tiered performance story in The Technomancer, with the data showing a system that scales predictably from 1080p dominance to 4K compromise. At 1920x1080, the combo is overwhelmingly fast, posting an average of 191 FPS at Low settings and never dipping below the playable 60 FPS threshold even at Ultra, where it still manages 98 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the pair remains fully playable across all presets, with Ultra averaging 64 FPS. At 3840x2160, however, the picture changes: only the Low preset clears 60 FPS with an average of 69 FPS, while Medium drops to 53 FPS and Ultra falls to 35 FPS. This is a system built for high-refresh 1440p gaming and smooth 1080p ultra settings, with 4K requiring significant graphical concessions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this configuration shows a consistent pattern across the three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the i5-12600KF and RTX 3070 combination delivers exceptional headroom. The Low preset averages 191 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Medium settings average 147 FPS, with a minimum of 125 FPS and a maximum of 169 FPS, indicating tight frame pacing. High settings average 125 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset still produces a robust 98 FPS average. None of these 1080p results approach the 60 FPS playability threshold, meaning the system is never challenged at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but begins to show the expected scaling curve. Low settings average 125 FPS, identical to the 1080p High result, which suggests the CPU is not a limiting factor here. Medium averages 96 FPS with a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS. High settings average 82 FPS, and Ultra still holds at 64 FPS average. The minimum recorded FPS at 1440p Medium is 82, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold, confirming that even the most demanding preset at this resolution maintains playable frame rates.

The 3840x2160 results reveal the GPU's limitations under 4K load. Low settings average 69 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS bar. Medium drops to an average of 53 FPS, with a minimum of 45 FPS and a maximum of 61 FPS, showing significant frame variance. High settings average 45 FPS, and Ultra falls to 35 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 34 FPS, a substantial spread that underscores how quickly the RTX 3070's bandwidth and compute resources are exhausted as pixel count rises. The data indicates that 4K gaming is only viable with the Low preset, and even then, the margin above 60 FPS is slim.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 1920x1080 with maximum settings?*

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 98 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The system has significant headroom, as even the most demanding settings do not cause frame rates to approach the minimum playable bound.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: The Ultra preset is playable at 1440p, averaging 64 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that maintains an average above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

Q: Is 4K gaming feasible with this hardware?

A: Only at Low settings. The 3840x2160 Low preset averages 69 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 53 FPS, High averages 45 FPS, and Ultra averages 35 FPS, so any preset above Low will result in sub-60 FPS performance.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,208. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 17,083, which is 0.7% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17,037, 1% lower, and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17,019, 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17,468, which is 1.5% higher.

Q: What is the CPU's performance position relative to its closest competitors?

A: The i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27,799. The Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27,872, a 0.3% difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27,712, 0.3% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27,887, 0.3% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27,896, also 0.3% higher.

Q: Does the system maintain consistent frame times at 1440p Medium?

A: The data shows a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS at 1440p Medium, with an average of 96 FPS. The 28 FPS spread between minimum and maximum indicates some variance, but the minimum remains far above the 60 FPS threshold, so gameplay stays smooth.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, delivering an average of 98 FPS. This is the most demanding setting available, and it maintains nearly 40 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS playability threshold. There is no reason to reduce quality at this resolution, as even the heaviest load leaves the system comfortably in high-refresh territory.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also qualifies as the best playable option, with an average of 64 FPS. This is a narrower margin above the threshold, but it is still playable. The data shows that High averages 82 FPS, providing a more comfortable buffer, but Ultra remains the best choice for users prioritizing visual fidelity over absolute frame rate headroom.

For 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only playable option, averaging 69 FPS. Medium drops to 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The 4K experience is therefore limited to the lowest quality settings, and even then, the margin above 60 FPS is only 9 FPS. Users targeting 4K should expect to sacrifice most graphical enhancements to maintain playability.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for The Technomancer, this specific CPU-GPU pairing ranks 1,578 out of 3,696 total combos. This places it in the upper-middle portion of the field, indicating that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it outperforms the majority of tested systems. The rank is driven by the combination's strong 1080p and 1440p results, which are offset by its weaker 4K performance. The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 79, meaning it outperforms 79% of tested processors. The GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 61, indicating it outperforms 61% of tested graphics cards. The rank of 1,578 suggests that the CPU's relative strength is somewhat mitigated by the GPU's more mid-pack positioning, resulting in a combo that is solid but not exceptional in the overall hierarchy.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core i9-10900K produces an average score of 27,872, which is effectively identical to the i5-12600KF's 27,799, differing by only 0.3%. A system using the i9-10900K would behave nearly the same in CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27,896, also 0.3% higher, offering comparable CPU performance for gaming workloads. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27,712, 0.3% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27,887, 0.3% higher, all falling within a narrow performance band.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the closest match, with an average score of 17,083 versus the RTX 3070's 17,208, a 0.7% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17,037, 1% lower, while the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17,019, 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17,468, which is 1.5% higher. In practical terms, swapping the RTX 3070 for the RX 7600 XT would result in nearly indistinguishable frame rates in The Technomancer.

The Verdict

The data confirms that this PC can run The Technomancer across all tested resolutions, but the experience varies sharply by target display. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable of running the Ultra preset at an average of 98 FPS, with all settings well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset remains playable with an average of 64 FPS, and all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS bar. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, averaging 69 FPS, while Medium (53 FPS), High (45 FPS), and Ultra (35 FPS) all fall short of the 60 FPS requirement. The verdict is clear: this is an excellent 1080p and strong 1440p gaming machine, but 4K users must accept Low settings to maintain playable frame rates. The combination of the i5-12600KF's strong single-threaded performance and the RTX 3070's ample bandwidth ensures a smooth experience at mainstream resolutions, while 4K remains a compromise.