Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

74%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
135 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
68 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
87 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
46 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
47 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
11.4ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 27,799
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 34 40 47
1440p QHD 46 57 71 87
1080p Full HD 68 88 104 135

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 88
1920x1080 Low 135
1920x1080 Medium 104
1920x1080 Ultra 68
2560x1440 High 57
2560x1440 Low 87
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 46
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Low 47
3840x2160 Medium 40
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The Technomancer, a 2016 action RPG, presents a demanding workload for the Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Arc B580 combination. The measured data indicates this pairing is fully capable of delivering smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K, even on the lowest settings. The benchmark results show a clear performance ceiling that is defined by the graphics card, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom across all tested resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-12600KF sits in a tight performance cluster according to the aggregate benchmark data. Its average benchmark score of 27799 places it within 0.3% of several comparable processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, with a score of 27896, is a mere 0.3% faster, indicating that in most gaming scenarios, these two CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates. Similarly, the Intel Core i9-10900K (27872, -0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (27887, -0.3%) are statistical equivalents, meaning users upgrading from these platforms would see negligible performance differences in The Technomancer. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE (27712, 0.3%) is also within the same performance envelope, making all five of these processors interchangeable for this specific game's CPU demands.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 places it alongside some unexpected company. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, a much higher-tier card, scores 23172, which is only 0.7% higher, suggesting that in this game's specific workload, the B580 performs on par with that flagship GPU. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, -0.2%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.6%) are also within a 1% margin, making them viable alternatives that would produce nearly identical frame rates. The NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, -1.0%) rounds out the group, though its performance profile is less relevant for modern gaming. For The Technomancer, any of these GPUs would yield very similar results, meaning the choice between them should be based on other factors like feature support or driver stability rather than raw performance in this title.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i5-12600KF and the Intel Arc B580 in The Technomancer. At 1920x1080, the game is heavily GPU-bound, as evidenced by the massive scaling between settings. The Low preset delivers 134.5 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 68.3 FPS, a reduction of nearly 50%. This indicates that the graphics card is the primary bottleneck, and the CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU at all settings. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, are more than sufficient for this title's demands.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU's load intensifies, but the CPU still maintains its role as the supporting actor. The frame rates at 1440p scale proportionally with the pixel count increase, with the Low preset dropping from 134.5 FPS to 86.6 FPS, a 36% reduction. This pattern continues at 3840x2160, where the Low preset yields 46.5 FPS, a further 46% drop from 1440p. The CPU's performance remains consistent throughout, as indicated by its high benchmark scores in multithreaded tests like Cinebench R23 (23391 multicore) and Passmark multithread (27575).

The data shows that the Intel Arc B580 is the limiting factor in all scenarios. At 4K Ultra, the combo achieves only 27.7 FPS, which is a 60% drop from the 1080p Ultra result of 68.3 FPS. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU that is overwhelmed by the pixel count and graphics settings. The CPU, by contrast, shows no signs of bottlenecking, as even the most demanding CPU tests in the pack show it performing well above the requirements of a game released in 2016. Therefore, for this combination, the GPU is the component that determines playability, and the CPU's role is to ensure consistent frame pacing without introducing stutter.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Arc B580 deliver excellent results across the board. The Low preset achieves 134.5 FPS, Medium hits 104.3 FPS, High reaches 87.5 FPS, and Ultra maintains 68.3 FPS. All of these exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, making 1080p a fully playable experience at any setting.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains solid but begins to show the GPU's limits. The Low preset drops to 86.6 FPS, which is still well above 60 FPS. Medium produces 70.5 FPS, comfortably playable. High dips to 57.2 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra falls further to 45.6 FPS, which is noticeably less smooth. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average reduction of about 35% across all settings, which is consistent with the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The Low preset yields 46.5 FPS, Medium drops to 40.2 FPS, High reaches 34.4 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 27.7 FPS. None of these reach the 60 FPS threshold, and even the lowest setting falls short by 13.5 FPS. The performance cliff from 1440p to 4K is steep, with an average reduction of approximately 45%, highlighting the GPU's inability to handle 4K rendering in this title. The absence of min and max FPS data in the pack means that frame time consistency cannot be assessed, but the average FPS figures alone indicate that 4K is not a viable option for this combination.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run The Technomancer at 60 FPS on 1080p Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured data shows an average FPS of 68.3 at 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset is the highest playable setting at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 70.5 FPS. The High preset drops to 57.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: No, the benchmark results indicate that no settings preset at 3840x2160 achieves 60 FPS. The best result is 46.5 FPS on Low settings, which is still below the playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896. This represents a delta of -0.3%, meaning the Ryzen is only marginally faster, and the two CPUs would perform nearly identically in The Technomancer.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895. The B580 is 0.6% faster, so users can expect essentially the same frame rates from both cards in this game.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: The Low preset achieves 134.5 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 68.3 FPS. This represents a 66.2 FPS difference, or a 49% reduction in performance when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

The benchmark data provides clear guidance on the optimal settings for each resolution to maintain 60 FPS or higher. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays within the playable threshold, achieving an average of 68.3 FPS. This means users can enjoy the game at maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset (87.5 FPS), Medium (104.3 FPS), and Low (134.5 FPS) are all also viable, but Ultra offers the best visual experience while still staying above the 60 FPS line.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the highest playable setting, delivering an average of 70.5 FPS. The High preset falls to 57.2 FPS, which is below the threshold, so users must step down to Medium to maintain fluid gameplay. The Low preset (86.6 FPS) is also playable but offers reduced visual fidelity. At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings, as even the Low preset only achieves 46.5 FPS. The best option for 4K would be to reduce the resolution to 1440p or accept a lower frame rate, as the data shows no preset can reach 60 FPS at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for The Technomancer, the Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the Intel Arc B580 holds a rank of 2832 out of 3696 tested combos. This places it in the 77th percentile of all configurations, meaning it outperforms roughly 23% of the tested systems. This ranking reflects the combo's strong 1080p and 1440p performance, but it is held back by its inability to achieve playable frame rates at 4K.

The ranking is consistent with the individual component performance. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 68th percentile ranking among all graphics cards suggest a balanced pairing where neither component is severely mismatched. The combo's overall rank of 2832 indicates that while it is a capable system for this game, it is not among the top performers. Many higher-end combinations, likely featuring more powerful GPUs, would achieve better 4K results and thus rank higher. However, for users targeting 1080p or 1440p gaming, this combo provides a solid experience, and its rank reflects its status as a mid-to-upper-tier configuration for The Technomancer.