The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for modern hardware due to its engine and rendering characteristics. This analysis evaluates the Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the Intel Arc B570 across three resolutions and four quality presets. The data indicates that this combination is capable of delivering a smooth experience at standard 1920x1080, with a significant performance drop-off occurring at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?

A: The combination achieves an average of 62 FPS at 1920x1080 on the Ultra preset, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Is 2560x1440 resolution playable with this hardware?

A: Yes, it is playable. The data shows that the Low and Medium presets both clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Medium averaging 61 FPS. The High preset falls short at 52 FPS.

Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, none of the tested presets reach the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average frame rate is 44 FPS on Low settings.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This specific CPU and GPU pairing ranks 2972 out of 3696 total tested combinations for this game, placing it in the lower percentile of systems capable of running The Technomancer.

Q: What is the most demanding setting that maintains at least 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: The Medium preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above the playable threshold, achieving an average of 61 FPS.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the Low and Ultra presets at 1920x1080?

A: At 1920x1080, the average frame rate drops from 121 FPS on Low to 62 FPS on Ultra, a difference of 59 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data for The Technomancer reveals a clear pattern where the GPU is the primary performance limiter, with the CPU providing a stable foundation. The transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 shows a substantial performance cost, and the jump to 3840x2160 is even more severe. For instance, at High settings, the average frame rate falls from 80 FPS at 1920x1080 to 52 FPS at 2560x1440, before dropping to 29 FPS at 3840x2160. This demonstrates that the game's rendering load scales aggressively with pixel count, putting increasing pressure on the graphics card.

At 1920x1080, the i5-12600KF is able to feed the Arc B570 effectively, as evidenced by the high frame rates across all presets. The difference between the Low and Ultra presets at this resolution is significant, but even the most demanding preset stays above the playable threshold. This suggests that at this resolution, the GPU is still the main constraint, but the CPU has enough headroom to prevent bottlenecking.

The situation changes at 2560x1440, where the performance cost becomes more pronounced. The High preset drops to 52 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 41 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is now being pushed much harder, and the CPU's role becomes less about keeping up and more about maintaining a stable frame delivery. The fact that only the Low and Medium presets can maintain 60 FPS at this resolution points to the GPU being the sole limiting factor for higher visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The highest average frame rate observed is 44 FPS on Low settings, and the Ultra preset averages just 22 FPS. The scaling between resolutions and presets shows that this combination is not viable for 4K gaming in The Technomancer. The CPU's performance is largely irrelevant here, as the GPU is simply overwhelmed by the pixel processing requirements. The data strongly suggests that users targeting 4K would need a substantially more powerful graphics card.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Arc B570 combination holds a rank of 2972 out of 3696 tested configurations for The Technomancer. This places it in the bottom 20% of all tested systems, indicating that it is a relatively low-performance pairing for this specific title. While the combo can achieve playable frame rates at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with adjusted settings, its overall standing suggests that many other hardware combinations will deliver a better experience.

This ranking is a holistic view that accounts for performance across all tested resolutions and presets. The combination's inability to produce playable frame rates at 3840x2160 is a major factor in its low rank. The high-end presets at 2560x1440 also fail to meet the 60 FPS target, further contributing to its position. In the context of the entire benchmark database, this system is positioned for entry-level 1080p gaming rather than high-refresh-rate or high-resolution play.

The rank also reflects the balance of the components. While the CPU is a capable performer, the GPU's performance ceiling limits the overall system. This data-driven ranking confirms that for a demanding game like The Technomancer, the graphics card's capabilities are the defining factor in the system's overall classification.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the benchmark scores, the Intel Arc B570's closest performance rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, with a delta of 0.1%, and the Intel Arc A750, with a delta of -0.1%. The RTX 3070 Mobile is a laptop-class GPU, but its average benchmark score is nearly identical to the Arc B570, suggesting that in this game, their performance would be very similar. The Arc A750 is the direct predecessor in Intel's lineup, and the data shows it performs within a fraction of a percent of the B570, making it a direct alternative.

On the CPU side, the Intel Core i5-12600KF is bracketed by several processors with very close average scores. The Intel Core i9-10900K and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D are both -0.3% from the i5's score, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is +0.3%. This indicates that in a gaming scenario, these CPUs would likely produce nearly identical frame rates when paired with the same GPU. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a notable alternative, as it is a popular choice for gaming, and the data here suggests its performance is effectively on par with the i5-12600KF for this workload.

Users looking for similar overall system performance could consider an Intel Arc A750 or a system built around the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile. On the CPU side, building a system with an Intel Core i9-10900K or an AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D would yield a very similar performance profile. The deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the differences in frame rates for a game like The Technomancer would be negligible.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which yields an average frame rate of 62 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that still maintains the 60 FPS playable threshold. All other presets at this resolution—High, Low, and Medium—also clear this threshold, with frame rates of 80, 121, and 93 FPS, respectively.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are Medium, which achieves an average of 61 FPS. This is the only preset besides Low that reaches the playable threshold. High and Ultra presets fall below, with averages of 52 FPS and 41 FPS, respectively. For a 60 FPS target, users must sacrifice visual quality at this resolution.

For 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The highest average frame rate is 44 FPS on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset averages 33 FPS, High averages 29 FPS, and Ultra averages 22 FPS. None of these presets can be considered playable for a smooth experience.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run The Technomancer, but its capability is strictly limited by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—achieving average frame rates above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset, at 62 FPS, is the recommended setting for the highest visual fidelity while maintaining playability.

At 2560x1440, the system remains functional, but the user must select the Low or Medium presets to stay at or above 60 FPS. The Medium preset is the best visual option, delivering an average of 61 FPS. Attempting to use the High or Ultra presets will result in frame rates that fall below the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot run the game at a playable level. The verdictByResolution data confirms that there are no playable settings at this resolution, with the best-case scenario being 44 FPS on Low. For a 60 FPS experience, this hardware combination is not suitable for 4K gaming in The Technomancer. The system's best use case is clearly 1080p gaming, where it can handle all settings, or 1440p gaming with reduced graphical presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160

• Ultra: Average 22 FPS.
• High: Average 29 FPS.
• Medium: Average 33 FPS, with a minimum of 28 FPS and a maximum of 39 FPS.
• Low: Average 44 FPS.

2560x1440

• Ultra: Average 41 FPS.
• High: Average 52 FPS.
• Medium: Average 61 FPS, with a minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 70 FPS.
• Low: Average 79 FPS.

1920x1080

• Ultra: Average 62 FPS.
• High: Average 80 FPS.
• Medium: Average 93 FPS, with a minimum of 79 FPS and a maximum of 107 FPS.
• Low: Average 121 FPS.

The frame time data for the Medium preset at 1920x1080 shows a range of 79 to 107 FPS, which is a 28 FPS spread, indicating some variance but still a smooth experience. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset's range is 52 to 70 FPS, a spread of 18 FPS, showing more consistent frame pacing. The 4K Medium preset shows a tighter range of 28 to 39 FPS, but the overall performance is too low to be considered playable.