The Technomancer

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the Intel Arc B390 presents a unique combination for running The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG. The CPU is a solid mainstream desktop processor, while the GPU is an integrated-class part based on Intel’s Panther Lake architecture. The recorded benchmark data shows a system that struggles at higher resolutions but can achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with the right settings. This analysis examines how this combo performs, what similar hardware exists, and what settings users should select.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU in this combination, the Intel Core i5-12400, sits in the 72nd percentile when compared to all tested processors. Its average benchmark score is 18683. The closest rival in the database is the AMD EPYC 7643, which scores 18697, a negligible 0.1% difference. This means the EPYC 7643 would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in The Technomancer. The Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18730, which is 0.3% higher, again placing it in the same performance tier. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 18811, 0.7% higher, while the Intel Core i3-14100F scores 18519, which is 0.9% lower. For practical purposes, any of these four processors would behave almost exactly like the i5-12400 in this game, with differences far below 1%.

The GPU side tells a different story. The Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1482, placing it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, which scores 1463, meaning the Arc B390 is 1.3% faster. The NVIDIA GeForce 800M scores 1460, a 1.5% gap. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1446, 2.5% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 scores 1443, 2.7% lower. These are all very old, low-end graphics solutions from over a decade ago. The data suggests that the Arc B390 performs at a level comparable to those legacy entry-level parts, which explains its limited ability to push high frame rates in modern or demanding titles. In The Technomancer, users should expect GPU-bound behavior similar to what those older NVIDIA parts would deliver.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific CPU-GPU combination for The Technomancer at position 3285 out of 3696 tested combos. That places it in the lower 11% of all configurations. The ranking is not surprising given the GPU’s low percentile. The CPU is capable, but the GPU holds the system back. The recorded data shows that the bottleneck is overwhelmingly on the graphics side. In practical terms, this combo falls far behind most desktop gaming systems, but it still outperforms the absolute bottom tier of integrated or legacy parts.

The ranking means that only 411 combos in the database perform worse than this pairing. The CPU can feed the GPU with enough data, as evidenced by the i5-12400’s strong multi-threaded scores, but the Arc B390 cannot translate that into high frame rates at demanding resolutions. The combination is best suited for low-resolution gaming or for playing older, less demanding titles at modest settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates show a clear pattern. At 3840x2160 (4K), the combo cannot reach playable performance under any setting. At Low settings, the average is 28 FPS. Medium averages 22 FPS, with a minimum of 19 and a maximum of 25 FPS. High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra drops to 15 FPS. All of these are far below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves slightly but remains unplayable. Low settings produce an average of 52 FPS, which is close but still short of 60. Medium averages 40 FPS, with a minimum of 34 and a maximum of 46. High averages 34 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. No setting at this resolution clears the 60 FPS line.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combo finally finds a workable range. Low settings deliver an average of 79 FPS, which is comfortably above the threshold. Medium settings average 61 FPS, with a minimum of 52 and a maximum of 70. High settings drop to an average of 52 FPS, and Ultra falls to 40 FPS. The data shows that Medium is the highest preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS.

The minimum frame rates are only recorded for Medium settings across all resolutions. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 19 FPS, at 1440p Medium it is 34 FPS, and at 1080p Medium it is 52 FPS. These minimums indicate that even at the playable 1080p Medium setting, there are moments of stutter or slowdown, but the average stays above the target.

The Verdict

This PC can run The Technomancer, but only at 1080p and only with specific settings. The verdict data shows that at 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The same is true for 2560x1440. At 1920x1080, the playable settings are Low and Medium. The best setting at 1080p is Medium, which achieves an average of 61 FPS.

Users who want a smooth experience should set the resolution to 1920x1080 and choose Medium presets. This will stay just above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings at 1080p will provide a more comfortable margin, with 79 FPS, but the visual quality will be noticeably reduced. High and Ultra settings at 1080p do not maintain 60 FPS, so they are not recommended. For 1440p or 4K, the system is not capable of delivering playable frame rates, regardless of the preset chosen.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest resolution at which this PC can maintain 60 FPS in The Technomancer?

A: The only resolution with playable settings is 1920x1080. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, no preset reaches an average of 60 FPS.

Q: Which preset should I use at 1080p for the best visual quality while staying above 60 FPS?

A: The Medium preset is the most demanding option that stays above the threshold, with an average of 61 FPS. Low averages 79 FPS but reduces visual fidelity.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B390 scores 1482 in the database. It is 1.3% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, 1.5% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce 800M, 2.5% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM, and 2.7% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400 a bottleneck for this game?

A: No. The CPU ranks in the 72nd percentile and its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7643, is only 0.1% different in average score. The GPU is the limiting factor, as it sits in the 9th percentile.

Q: What are the average frame rates at 1440p Low settings?

A: The average is 52 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. No setting at 1440p is listed as playable in the database.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate at 1080p Medium settings?

A: The minimum is 52 FPS, while the maximum is 70 FPS. The average is 61 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, no settings meet the 60 FPS requirement. The highest average recorded is 28 FPS at Low, but that is far below the playable threshold. The database does not list a best setting for this resolution because none are playable.

For 2560x1440, the situation is identical. The best average is 52 FPS at Low, but it still falls short of 60. No playable settings exist, so no best setting is provided.

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium. At Medium, the average is 61 FPS, with a minimum of 52 and a maximum of 70. Low is also playable, averaging 79 FPS, but Medium offers better visuals while still clearing the threshold. High and Ultra are not playable, averaging 52 FPS and 40 FPS respectively. Therefore, users targeting 1080p should select Medium for the best balance of quality and performance.