Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Technomancer
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 53 | 68 | 80 | 105 |
| 1440p QHD | 98 | 128 | 147 | 156 |
| 1080p Full HD | 146 | 157 | 167 | 183 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System
The Technomancer, an Action RPG released in 2016, places moderate demands on modern hardware. This analysis examines the performance of the Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER across three resolutions and four quality presets. The recorded data provides a clear picture of how this combination handles the game, indicating that the pairing is overwhelmingly successful at delivering high frame rates.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The database groups this CPU and GPU with other hardware that produces similar aggregate benchmark scores. For the Intel Core i5-10400F, the nearest performance rivals are led by the Intel Core 7 160UL, which scores only 0.3% higher. The Intel Xeon 6756E is essentially tied, with a score 0.2% higher. The AMD EPYC 7552 trails by a negligible 0.5%, while the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is 0.6% faster. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in The Technomancer, given the same graphics card.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER sits in a similarly tight cluster. The closest rival is the standard NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which scores 0.1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% faster, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.7% faster, and the AMD Radeon 8060S leads the group at 2.8% faster. These percentage differences are minor, so a system built with the RTX 4080 would behave almost indistinguishably from one using the RTX 4080 SUPER in this title, and even the AMD alternatives would only produce a few frames per second of difference at most. For users seeking similar in-game performance, these five GPUs and four CPUs define the immediate competitive set.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in system bottleneck behavior as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the CPU exerts a strong influence, but the RTX 4080 SUPER is powerful enough to keep frame rates very high regardless. The spread between the lowest and highest average FPS at this resolution is 37.5 FPS, from 145.7 FPS at Ultra to 183.2 FPS at Low. This indicates that the graphics card is not fully saturated at lower settings, and the CPU is the limiting factor for maximum achievable frames.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on more responsibility. The average frame rates remain high, but the scaling between presets changes. The difference from Low to Ultra is 58.1 FPS, showing that the graphics load is becoming more significant. The RTX 4080 SUPER still has ample headroom, as evidenced by the 128.3 FPS average at High settings, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The frame rate drops are steep as settings increase, with the Ultra preset falling to 53.1 FPS, below the playable threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 51.7 FPS. The CPU, while still relevant, is no longer the primary bottleneck; the sheer pixel count and shading demands of 4K resolution saturate the RTX 4080 SUPER well before the i5-10400F reaches its limit. The conclusion is that the CPU matters most at 1080p for pushing maximum frame rates, while the GPU dictates performance at 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded measurements provide a detailed view of performance across all nine tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the Intel Core i5-10400F and RTX 4080 SUPER combination delivers exceptional results. The Low preset achieves an average of 183.2 FPS, while Medium reaches 167.4 FPS. High settings produce 157.3 FPS, and the demanding Ultra preset still manages 145.7 FPS. Every setting at this resolution clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin, offering a smooth experience even in the most graphically intense scenes.
At 2560x1440, performance remains robust. The Low preset records an average of 156.4 FPS, Medium follows closely at 146.5 FPS, and High stays strong at 128.3 FPS. The Ultra preset, while more demanding, still delivers a very playable 98.3 FPS. All four presets at 1440p comfortably exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, making this resolution entirely viable for high-refresh-rate monitors.
The situation changes at 3840x2160. The Low preset still performs admirably, with an average of 104.8 FPS. Medium drops to 80.1 FPS, and High settles at 68 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, falls below the playable threshold, averaging only 53.1 FPS. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to reach 60 FPS. The minimum and maximum FPS values were not recorded for any setting, so the analysis relies on average frame rates, which show a consistent and predictable scaling pattern across all resolutions and presets.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing holds a rank of 668 out of 3696 total combos. This places it in the top 18.1% of all tested systems. This high ranking is expected given the strength of the RTX 4080 SUPER, which sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the i5-10400F is at the 68th percentile among CPUs. The combination of a strong but not top-tier CPU with a near-flagship GPU produces a system that excels in gaming workloads, as reflected by its position in the upper quintile of the rankings. The rank indicates that for The Technomancer specifically, this setup outperforms the vast majority of other hardware pairings in the database.
The Verdict
The data clearly answers the question of whether this PC can run The Technomancer. At 1920x1080, the system runs all presets, including Ultra, with an average of 145.7 FPS, far exceeding the 60 FPS target. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 98.3 FPS, again well above the threshold, and all other presets are even faster. At 3840x2160, the system runs Low, Medium, and High presets at 104.8, 80.1, and 68 FPS respectively, all playable. The Ultra preset at 4K is the sole exception, averaging 53.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. In summary, the system is fully capable of running the game at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with High settings or lower. Only the combination of 4K resolution and Ultra quality presents a challenge, where users would need to reduce settings to achieve a smooth frame rate.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, at 4K with High settings it averages 68 FPS, and with Medium settings it averages 80.1 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, averaging 53.1 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset at 2560x1440?
A: The Ultra preset is the best choice, as it maintains an average of 98.3 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i5-10400F is nearly identical in performance to the Intel Core 7 160UL and Intel Xeon 6756E, with score differences of 0.3% and 0.2% respectively. It is also close to the AMD EPYC 7552 and AMD Ryzen 3 7320C, which differ by 0.5% and 0.6%.
Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 1920x1080?
A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 1080p averages 145.7 FPS, making it not only playable but also suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.
Q: What is the performance difference between the RTX 4080 SUPER and RTX 4080 in this game?
A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080, indicating virtually identical gaming performance between the two cards.
Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded for this system?
A: The lowest average frame rate is 53.1 FPS, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra preset.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers 68 FPS on average. This provides a solid playable experience while retaining high visual quality. The Ultra preset at this resolution averages 53.1 FPS, so it is not recommended for a smooth experience.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is fully playable with an average of 98.3 FPS. This is the best settings choice, as it offers the highest visual fidelity while still maintaining a frame rate far above the 60 FPS threshold. All lower presets also exceed 60 FPS, but Ultra provides the best visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation, averaging 145.7 FPS. This delivers maximum graphical quality with an exceptionally high frame rate, making it ideal for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors. The system has sufficient headroom at this resolution to run the game at its highest settings without any concern for performance drops below the playable threshold.