Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Technomancer
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 53 | 63 | 82 |
| 1440p QHD | 76 | 93 | 111 | 143 |
| 1080p Full HD | 115 | 146 | 173 | 225 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System
The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a robust performance profile in The Technomancer, with benchmark results showing a clear path to high refresh rate gaming at standard resolutions and a workable, though limited, experience at 4K. The measured data indicates that this combination is capable of handling the game smoothly across most settings, with the primary bottleneck appearing at the highest 3840x2160 preset. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, component roles, and comparative standing of this hardware pairing.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold is Medium, which achieves an average of 62.6 FPS. The High preset falls short of this target with an average of 52.9 FPS, while Ultra is the most demanding option tested, producing an average of 42 FPS. The Low preset at 4K runs significantly faster at 82 FPS, but Medium is the optimal choice for balancing visual fidelity with performance, as it is the highest quality setting that still clears the 60 FPS bar.
Moving down to 2560x1440, the data shows that all four tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable. The highest quality setting, Ultra, delivers an average of 76.4 FPS, making it the best settings choice for this resolution. This provides a substantial visual upgrade over the Medium preset at 110.8 FPS and the High preset at 93.1 FPS, while still maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 1920x1080, the performance headroom is considerable. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 115.1 FPS, which is the most demanding setting tested and remains well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All other presets—High at 146.4 FPS, Medium at 172.9 FPS, and Low at 225.4 FPS—are also playable, but Ultra is the recommended setting for this resolution to maximize graphical quality without sacrificing smooth gameplay.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions and presets indicates that the GPU is the dominant component for this game, while the CPU provides sufficient headroom to avoid becoming a limiting factor. The evidence is most apparent when comparing the 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 results. At 1080p with the Low preset, the average frame rate reaches 225.4 FPS, while at 1440p with the same Low preset, it drops to 143.3 FPS. This represents a significant reduction of approximately 36% in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 1440p, which is characteristic of GPU-bound workloads where the rendering resolution directly impacts the frame output.
The scaling between the Low and Ultra presets further clarifies this relationship. At 1920x1080, the frame rate drops from 225.4 FPS on Low to 115.1 FPS on Ultra, a reduction of roughly 49%. At 2560x1440, the drop is from 143.3 FPS on Low to 76.4 FPS on Ultra, a similar proportional decrease of about 47%. At 3840x2160, the Low preset produces 82 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 42 FPS, a 49% reduction. This consistent proportional scaling across resolutions indicates that the game’s performance is driven primarily by the GPU’s rendering throughput, as the relative cost of each preset remains stable regardless of the resolution.
The CPU’s role is less prominent in the data. The Intel Core i3-12100F, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11860 and a single-core score of 1674. These scores are sufficient to feed the RTX 3080 at the tested settings, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p. If the CPU were a bottleneck, the frame rate would show less scaling between 1080p and 1440p, as the GPU would be waiting on the CPU to issue draw calls. Instead, the frame rate scales consistently with the pixel count, confirming that the GPU is the primary performance driver. The CPU’s benchmark scores, including a PassMark single-thread score of 3444 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1932, place it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs, indicating that it is a capable mid-range processor for gaming workloads.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores provide a picture of similar performance. The Intel Core 3 N355 has an average score of 13492, which is essentially identical to the i3-12100F’s 13494, with a deltaPct of 0. The Intel Core i5-9500 is also close, with an average score of 13452 and a deltaPct of 0.3, meaning it performs nearly the same. The Intel Core 5 120UL shows a slightly higher score of 13594, putting it 0.7% ahead of the i3-12100F, while the Intel Core i7-1250U trails with a score of 13351, a 1.1% difference. These alternatives would likely produce very similar frame rates in The Technomancer, as their overall processing power is within a narrow margin of the i3-12100F.
On the GPU side, the RTX 3080’s nearest rivals are also closely matched. The NVIDIA P106-100 has an average score of 23249, a 0.3% difference from the RTX 3080’s 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, also a 0.3% difference, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, a 0.4% difference. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X completes the group with a score of 23276, a 0.4% difference. These GPUs would be expected to deliver nearly identical performance in this game, given their benchmark scores are within a fraction of a percent of the RTX 3080. Users with these alternatives should expect similar FPS figures at each resolution and preset combination.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, but with limitations. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset achieves an average of 62.6 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset averages 52.9 FPS and the Ultra preset averages 42 FPS, both below the threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 is the best choice, delivering an average of 76.4 FPS. All four tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at this resolution, with Ultra offering the highest visual quality while still staying above 60 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance in this game?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary performance driver. The frame rate scales consistently with resolution, dropping from 225.4 FPS at 1080p Low to 143.3 FPS at 1440p Low, which is typical of GPU-bound workloads. The i3-12100F’s benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11860, are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 3080.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 a good match for the i3-12100F in this title?
A: Yes. The combination produces high frame rates across most settings, with the Ultra preset at 1080p averaging 115.1 FPS and the Ultra preset at 1440p averaging 76.4 FPS. The CPU does not appear to hold back the GPU, as performance scales predictably with resolution.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with the highest settings?
A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 produces an average of 115.1 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the highest settings preset tested and provides a smooth experience.
Q: Are there other GPUs that would perform similarly to the RTX 3080 in this game?
A: Based on average benchmark scores, the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, AMD Radeon RX 6600M, and AMD Radeon R9 M290X are all within 0.4% of the RTX 3080’s score. These would be expected to produce nearly identical frame rates in The Technomancer.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates are as follows: the Low preset runs at 225.4 FPS, the Medium preset at 172.9 FPS, the High preset at 146.4 FPS, and the Ultra preset at 115.1 FPS. All of these figures are significantly above the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating that this resolution is well within the capabilities of the hardware.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. The Low preset averages 143.3 FPS, the Medium preset averages 110.8 FPS, the High preset averages 93.1 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 76.4 FPS. Each preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset providing the most demanding visual experience at a still-playable frame rate.
At 3840x2160, the performance drops considerably. The Low preset averages 82 FPS, which is playable, and the Medium preset averages 62.6 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset averages 52.9 FPS and the Ultra preset averages 42 FPS, both of which fall below the playable threshold. This resolution requires a compromise on settings to maintain smooth gameplay.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i3-12100F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 1029 out of 3696 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the upper third of all tested hardware pairings, indicating that it performs well relative to the broader database of systems. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU, with the RTX 3080 providing strong graphics performance and the i3-12100F offering adequate processing power to support it. Given that the data is measured, this rank is based on actual frame rate results rather than theoretical estimates, making it a reliable indicator of real-world performance.
The Verdict
This PC can run The Technomancer, with the playability depending on the chosen resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, all tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the Ultra preset achieving an average of 115.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, with the Ultra preset reaching an average of 76.4 FPS. At 3840x2160, only the Low and Medium presets are playable, with the Medium preset providing the best balance at an average of 62.6 FPS. The High and Ultra presets at 4K fall below the 60 FPS threshold. Overall, the hardware is capable of delivering a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, while 4K gaming is possible but requires reducing the graphics preset to Medium.