Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
138 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
70 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
90 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
46 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
49 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
25 FPS
11.1ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 75,779
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 32 38 49
1440p QHD 46 59 69 90
1080p Full HD 70 90 106 138

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 90
1920x1080 Low 138
1920x1080 Medium 106
1920x1080 Ultra 70
2560x1440 High 59
2560x1440 Low 90
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 Ultra 46
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 49
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 Ultra 25

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a playable experience in The Technomancer, but the results are heavily dependent on resolution and quality preset. At 1080p, the system is capable across the board, while 1440p requires a settings compromise, and 4K remains out of reach for smooth gameplay. The measured data shows a clear performance hierarchy that scales predictably with resolution and preset selection.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset produces an average of 138 FPS, making it the fastest configuration tested. Medium settings average 106 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 90 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS. High settings maintain a solid 90 FPS average. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding at this resolution, still achieves 70 FPS on average. All 1080p presets clear the 60 FPS playability threshold with comfortable margins.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably but remains workable. The Low preset averages 90 FPS, which is identical to the 1080p High result. Medium settings produce a 69 FPS average, with a minimum of 59 FPS and maximum of 79 FPS, placing it just above the playability line. High settings average 59 FPS, which falls just short of the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra at 1440p drops to 46 FPS on average, a significant reduction from the Medium preset.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The Low preset averages 49 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings average 38 FPS, with a minimum of 32 FPS and maximum of 44 FPS. High settings drop further to 32 FPS average. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding just 25 FPS on average. None of the 4K presets come close to the playability threshold.

The frame time consistency varies by preset. At 1440p Medium, the gap between minimum and maximum FPS is 20 frames, indicating some variance. At 1080p Medium, the range is 31 frames, from 90 to 121 FPS. These swings suggest the engine is sensitive to scene complexity, though the averages remain stable enough for playable experiences at the appropriate settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows that the Intel Arc B580 is the primary performance limiter in this configuration. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a high-end 16-core processor with a 128 MB L3 cache and boost clock of 5.70 GHz, and its benchmark scores place it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, by contrast, sits in the 68th percentile among all GPUs. This imbalance indicates that the graphics card will constrain frame rates before the CPU becomes a bottleneck.

The scaling between resolutions confirms the GPU-bound nature of the workload. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings reduces the average FPS from 106 to 69, a 35% drop. Going from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings further reduces the average from 69 to 38, a 45% decline. This steep degradation with increasing pixel count is typical of a system where the GPU is saturated.

The preset scaling provides additional evidence. At 1440p, moving from Low to Medium reduces performance by 23%, while going from Medium to High costs another 14%. The jump from High to Ultra is the most expensive, costing 22% of the frame rate. This non-linear scaling suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU's 2560 shading units and 80 ROPs.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 138 FPS, which is high enough that the CPU's single-thread performance may start to matter. However, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1292 and a passmark single-thread score of 4737, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D has ample headroom. The game's 2016 release date also suggests it is not heavily multi-threaded, so the CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads are unlikely to be fully utilized.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark performance are all within a narrow band. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75738, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's 75779 average. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D is essentially tied at 75716, also 0.1% behind. The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75582, a 0.3% difference, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488, 0.4% lower. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in The Technomancer.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show a mixed picture. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B580's 23021 average. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, 0.6% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1% higher. The Arc B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is notable for its class. These rival GPUs would deliver similar frame rates in this game, with the RTX 3080 being the fastest of the group by a small margin.

The Verdict

This PC can run The Technomancer at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. The verdict data identifies 1920x1080 as fully playable, with all four presets clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The best 1080p result is Ultra at 70 FPS average, which provides the highest visual quality while maintaining smooth performance.

At 2560x1440, the system is partially playable. The Low and Medium presets both achieve average frame rates above 60 FPS, at 90 and 69 FPS respectively. The High preset falls just short at 59 FPS, and Ultra is not playable at 46 FPS. For 1440p gaming, users should select either Low or Medium settings.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain playable performance at any preset. The best result is Low at 49 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. All other presets produce lower averages, down to 25 FPS at Ultra. The data clearly shows that 4K is not viable for this game with this hardware combination.

The system's overall rank in the game's benchmark database is 2787 out of 3696 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle range. This ranking reflects the GPU's mid-tier positioning rather than the CPU's high-end capabilities.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher is Ultra, which averages 70 FPS. This provides the highest visual fidelity available while staying above the playability threshold. Users can also select High at 90 FPS, Medium at 106 FPS, or Low at 138 FPS if they prefer higher frame rates over visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, achieving 69 FPS on average. This is the only preset above Low that clears the 60 FPS threshold, as High falls to 59 FPS and Ultra drops to 46 FPS. The Medium preset offers a reasonable balance between visual quality and performance, though the 59 FPS minimum indicates occasional dips below the threshold.

At 3840x2160, no preset is playable. The most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS does not exist, as even Low averages only 49 FPS. Users seeking 4K performance would need to consider different hardware or accept sub-60 FPS gameplay.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run The Technomancer at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the best result is Low settings with 49 FPS average, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The Ultra preset at 4K averages only 25 FPS.

Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 average 69 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS and maximum of 79 FPS. High settings drop to 59 FPS average, just below the threshold.

Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at 1080p?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 70 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: Which component limits performance in this game?

A: The Intel Arc B580 GPU is the primary limiter. It ranks in the 68th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D ranks in the 95th percentile among CPUs. Frame rates scale steeply with resolution, confirming the GPU-bound nature.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings?

A: The average frame rate drops from 106 FPS at 1080p to 69 FPS at 1440p, a 35% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings reduces the average from 69 to 38 FPS, a further 45% decline.

Q: Are there other GPUs that would perform similarly to the Arc B580 in this game?

A: The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which scores 0.2% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, which scores 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 0.6% lower. All would produce similar frame rates in The Technomancer.