Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Technomancer
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 35 | 39 | 48 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 58 | 67 | 87 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 88 | 106 | 139 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a playable experience in The Technomancer at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K across all tested presets. The data shows a clear ceiling at 4K, where even the Low preset only reaches an average of 47.6 FPS, making the resolution unplayable by the 60 FPS standard. At 1440p, the combo achieves playable frame rates on Low and Medium settings, while 1080p offers the most headroom, with all four presets exceeding 60 FPS. This pairing is positioned at the 76th percentile of all tested CPU/GPU combinations for this specific title, indicating solid but not exceptional performance relative to other hardware configurations.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the benchmark results show a steep performance gradient as settings increase. The Low preset yields an average of 47.6 FPS, which is the only 4K configuration to approach playability. Medium drops to 38.8 FPS, High falls further to 34.5 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 26.4 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 21.2 FPS, representing a 44.5% performance penalty when moving from the least to most demanding preset. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution, as each settings tier produces a substantial and predictable frame rate reduction.
The 2560x1440 results paint a more favorable picture. Low settings produce 86.7 FPS, Medium achieves 67.2 FPS, and High lands at 57.6 FPS. Ultra is the outlier at 46.6 FPS, which is notably below the playability threshold. The gap between Low and Medium is 19.5 FPS, while the Medium to High transition costs 9.6 FPS. The High to Ultra drop is 11 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset introduces rendering features that disproportionately impact performance at this resolution. These numbers indicate that the sweet spot lies between Medium and High, with Medium offering the best balance of visual quality and frame rate.
At 1920x1080, the combo shows its strongest performance. Low settings deliver 138.7 FPS, Medium reaches 106.2 FPS, High achieves 87.8 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 73 FPS. The scaling from Low to Medium is a 32.5 FPS reduction, while Medium to High costs 18.4 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 14.8 FPS. The relative consistency of these deltas suggests that at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU adequately across all settings, and the performance curve is smoother than at higher resolutions. Even the most demanding preset remains 13 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, providing comfortable margin for gameplay.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS playability threshold. The best result is Low at 47.6 FPS, which falls 12.4 FPS short of the target. As a result, there is no recommended setting for 4K; users seeking playable frame rates must either reduce the resolution or accept sub-60 FPS performance. The data clearly indicates that this combination is not suited for 4K gaming in The Technomancer.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, which delivers an average of 67.2 FPS. This is 7.2 FPS above the playability threshold and represents the highest visual quality that maintains 60 FPS. The Low preset also qualifies at 86.7 FPS, but Medium offers superior visual fidelity while still exceeding the threshold by a comfortable margin. High falls short at 57.6 FPS, so it is not recommended for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best playable option, achieving 73 FPS. This is 13 FPS above the threshold, providing enough headroom for minor frame time fluctuations. All four presets—Low at 138.7 FPS, Medium at 106.2 FPS, High at 87.8 FPS, and Ultra at 73 FPS—exceed the playability standard. The Ultra preset is the clear recommendation for 1080p, as it delivers the highest visual quality without sacrificing the 60 FPS target.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling between resolutions reveals the division of labor between the Ryzen 9 7900X and the Arc B580. At 1080p, the frame rates are high enough that the CPU’s 12-core, 24-thread configuration likely provides sufficient headroom to keep the GPU fed, as evidenced by the smooth progression from Low to Ultra. The Ryzen 9 7900X’s single-thread performance, shown by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1093, is adequate for the game’s engine at this resolution.
Moving to 1440p, the frame rates drop by roughly 30-40% across all settings compared to 1080p, which points to the GPU becoming more influential. The 67.2 FPS at Medium and 57.6 FPS at High suggest that the Arc B580’s rendering throughput is the primary constraint, rather than the CPU. The GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the relevant metrics here, and they appear to be the limiting factor as resolution increases.
At 4K, the GPU’s role is dominant. The 47.6 FPS at Low and 26.4 FPS at Ultra demonstrate that the Arc B580 cannot handle the pixel throughput required at this resolution, regardless of CPU capability. The Ryzen 9 7900X’s high multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 29300, are irrelevant when the GPU is the bottleneck. The data indicates that for this game, the Arc B580 is the limiting component at 1440p and above, while the CPU is sufficient at 1080p and does not constrain performance even at Ultra settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2817 out of 3696 tested combos in The Technomancer. This places the pairing in the 76th percentile of all configurations, meaning roughly 24% of tested combos perform better. The ranking reflects the GPU’s mid-range positioning, as the CPU is a high-end part that ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The composite rank is dragged down by the Arc B580’s relatively modest performance in this title.
The 2817 rank indicates that this combo is not a top-tier performer for The Technomancer, but it is also not a poor one. Given that the CPU is far stronger than the GPU in relative terms, the ranking suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. Users with this combo should expect performance in line with other mid-range GPU configurations, and the ranking confirms that the 1080p and 1440p playable results are representative of the hardware’s capabilities.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD EPYC 7313P has an average score of 53206, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 9 7900X’s 53288 average. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, 0.3% higher, while the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974, 0.6% lower. The Intel Core i7-14700F is the closest in performance at 53620, just 0.6% ahead. For gaming purposes, these alternatives would behave similarly in terms of CPU-bound scenarios, though the EPYC and Xeon parts are server-oriented and may lack the same consumer platform features.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which has an average score of 23061, 0.2% higher than the Arc B580’s 23021. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 0.6% lower, while the RTX 3080 scores 23172, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1% higher. These alternatives would produce similar frame rates in The Technomancer, with the RTX 3080 being the strongest performer by a small margin. Users with any of these GPUs paired with a similar CPU should expect comparable results to the measured FPS data.
FAQ
Q: Can this combination run The Technomancer at 60 FPS on 4K?
A: No. The best 4K result is 47.6 FPS on Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. No preset at 3840x2160 achieves playable frame rates.
Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1440p?
A: Medium is the best playable setting at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 67.2 FPS. High is not playable at 57.6 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, the CPU has sufficient headroom, as shown by the smooth scaling from 138.7 FPS on Low to 73 FPS on Ultra. The GPU becomes the main constraint at higher resolutions.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080 in this game?
A: The Arc B580 has an average score of 23021, while the RTX 2080 scores 22895, making the Arc B580 0.6% faster in synthetic benchmarks. In-game frame rates would be very similar.
Q: What is the combo’s overall rank for The Technomancer?
A: The combo ranks 2817 out of 3696 tested configurations, placing it in the 76th percentile. This is a mid-range result driven primarily by the GPU’s performance.
Q: Is the Ryzen 9 7900X overkill for the Arc B580 in this title?
A: The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile. The data suggests the CPU is far more capable than the GPU, so the GPU limits overall performance in this pairing.