Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
235 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
162 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
206 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
103 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
114 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
4.9ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 25,517
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 75 90 114
1440p QHD 103 137 159 206
1080p Full HD 162 203 214 235

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 203
1920x1080 Low 235
1920x1080 Medium 214
1920x1080 Ultra 162
2560x1440 High 137
2560x1440 Low 206
2560x1440 Medium 159
2560x1440 Ultra 103
3840x2160 High 75
3840x2160 Low 114
3840x2160 Medium 90
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 presents a striking generational contrast: a 2022 mid-range CPU with an eight-core Zen 3 design is paired with a 2025 flagship GPU built on Blackwell architecture. The data for The Technomancer shows this combination produces a very wide range of frame rates depending on resolution and settings, from a demanding 59.7 FPS at 4K Ultra to a fluid 234.9 FPS at 1080p Low. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, the balance between the two components, and what the numbers imply for players targeting specific visual presets.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database all cluster within a very tight performance band. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 posts an average benchmark score of 25517, sitting just 0.1% below the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (score 25530) and 0.1% below the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (score 25550). The gap to the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is a mere 0.1% in the other direction (score 25485), while the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U trails by 0.3% (score 25446). For The Technomancer, any of these processors would deliver near-identical CPU-bound behavior, meaning the bottleneck characteristics at lower resolutions would remain essentially unchanged.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5080's average score of 56083 places it in a more interesting competitive landscape. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is actually 2.2% faster (score 57367), making it a slightly stronger alternative for this game. The AMD Radeon 8060S is 0.6% slower (score 55757), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB trails by 0.7% (score 55698). The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is further behind at 2.3% slower (score 54828). When considering a similar build, swapping the RTX 5080 for the RX 9070 GRE would likely yield marginally higher frame rates, while the RX 8060S or RX 6750 GRE would produce nearly indistinguishable results in this title.

The practical implication of these rivalries is that the measured FPS figures for this combo are not unique to these exact parts. A system with the Ryzen 7 5700 and an RX 9070 GRE would be expected to exceed the scores below by roughly 2%, while a build using the Ryzen 5 6600H and RX 8060S would land within a fraction of a percent of the same results. This suggests the RTX 5080's dominance in the raw benchmark data is somewhat muted in The Technomancer, where the CPU's single-threaded performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 901) and the game's engine constraints play a larger role than raw GPU compute.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling patterns across resolutions reveal which component governs performance in The Technomancer. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low and Ultra settings is 73.3 FPS (234.9 down to 161.6), while at 3840x2160 that same settings gap shrinks to 54.7 FPS (114.4 down to 59.7). This narrowing delta as resolution increases is the classic signature of a GPU-bound workload at higher pixel counts, with the CPU becoming the limiting factor at lower resolutions.

The data shows a dramatic resolution scaling effect. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings drops the average FPS from 161.6 to 103.2, a 36% reduction. Going further to 4K Ultra yields 59.7 FPS, another 42% drop from the 1440p figure. These steep declines indicate the RTX 5080's rendering load scales almost linearly with pixel count, while the Ryzen 7 5700's 8-core, 16-thread configuration (with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz) appears sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p without becoming a hard bottleneck.

At 1080p Low, the 234.9 FPS result suggests the CPU is still keeping pace, but the 44.5 FPS jump from Low to Medium (234.9 to 213.7) and the further 12.1 FPS drop to High (202.7) indicate that the game's settings are beginning to shift load toward the GPU. At 4K, the CPU role diminishes further; the 114.4 FPS at Low versus 75.3 FPS at High shows the GPU is now the primary constraint, with the CPU's 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s) providing ample headroom. For players at 1440p and above, the RTX 5080 is clearly the dominant factor, while at 1080p the Ryzen 7 5700's single-thread performance (3dmark_2_threads score of 1762) keeps the system balanced.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the RTX 5080 delivers 114.4 FPS on Low settings, which drops to 90.0 FPS on Medium, then 75.3 FPS on High, and finally 59.7 FPS on Ultra. The step from Medium to High costs 14.7 FPS, while the jump to Ultra costs another 15.6 FPS. This resolution clearly stresses the GPU, with only the Low preset maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, performance is substantially higher across all presets. Low settings produce 206.3 FPS, Medium yields 159.1 FPS, High reaches 136.8 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 103.2 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 103.1 FPS, showing that the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution. Even the most demanding preset clears the playable threshold by over 43 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the numbers become almost excessive for standard displays. Low settings hit 234.9 FPS, Medium follows at 213.7 FPS, High drops to 202.7 FPS, and Ultra remains at 161.6 FPS. The scaling from High to Ultra is the largest single-step penalty at 41.1 FPS, suggesting the Ultra preset introduces a significant rendering cost. Notably, the minimum and maximum FPS fields are null in all measurements, meaning the data only reflects average frame rates without capturing frame time variance or stutter behavior.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run The Technomancer at 4K with High settings?*

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 75.3 FPS, which is 15.3 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls to 59.7 FPS, just below the playable mark.

Q: What is the best resolution for maximum visual quality while staying above 60 FPS?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 103.2 FPS, which is 43.2 FPS above the threshold. This is the highest resolution where the most demanding settings remain comfortably playable.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rival in this game's context?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% faster than the RTX 5080 in average benchmark score (57367 vs 56083), suggesting it would deliver slightly higher frame rates. The AMD Radeon 8060S and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB are within 0.7% slower, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests no severe bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 234.9 FPS, which is 45.4 FPS higher than at 1440p Low (206.3 FPS). The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a 4.60 GHz boost clock, appear sufficient to drive the GPU at this resolution.

Q: What preset should be avoided at 4K?

A: The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 produces an average of 59.7 FPS, which is 0.3 FPS below the playable threshold. While the difference is marginal, the data indicates this setting does not clear the 60 FPS mark.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combination ranks 240th out of 3696 tested combos for this game, placing it in the top 6.5% of all systems evaluated.

The Verdict

This PC can run The Technomancer at all three tested resolutions, but with important caveats at the highest settings. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low (114.4 FPS), Medium (90.0 FPS), and High (75.3 FPS), while Ultra falls just short at 59.7 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, every preset clears the playable bar with substantial headroom. Ultra delivers 103.2 FPS, High reaches 136.8 FPS, Medium hits 159.1 FPS, and Low achieves 206.3 FPS. This resolution offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, with the Ultra preset still providing 43.2 FPS of margin.

At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly capable. Even Ultra settings produce 161.6 FPS, while Low reaches 234.9 FPS. For players with high refresh rate monitors, this resolution is ideal, as every preset exceeds 160 FPS. The verdict is clear: the system is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p across all settings, and at 4K with the exception of the Ultra preset, which misses the threshold by a slim 0.3 FPS margin.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 75.3 FPS. This provides 15.3 FPS of headroom over the playable threshold. The Medium preset offers 90.0 FPS for players who prefer smoother motion, while Low reaches 114.4 FPS for maximum frame rates.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is the best choice, averaging 103.2 FPS. This is the highest visual quality available in the game and still maintains 43.2 FPS of margin above the threshold. Players seeking even higher refresh rates can use High (136.8 FPS) or Medium (159.1 FPS) without sacrificing playability.

At 1920x1080, Ultra again provides the best visual experience at 161.6 FPS. This preset clears the 60 FPS threshold by 101.6 FPS, making it the obvious choice for this resolution. For competitive play or extreme refresh rates, Low (234.9 FPS) or Medium (213.7 FPS) offer additional headroom, but the Ultra preset is already far beyond the playable requirement.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination ranks 240th out of 3696 tested combos for The Technomancer, placing it in the 93.5th percentile of all systems. This top-tier positioning is driven primarily by the GPU's strong performance, as the CPU's 78th percentile ranking among all processors (avgBenchmarkScore 25517) is respectable but not elite.

The GPU's 87th percentile ranking among all graphics cards (avgBenchmarkScore 56083) indicates that the RTX 5080 is the dominant contributor to this combo's high standing. The 2.2% faster RX 9070 GRE rival suggests that a different GPU pairing could push this combo slightly higher in the rankings, while the 0.3% slower Ryzen 7 5825U CPU rival indicates that the processor choice has a minimal impact on the overall ranking. For a game released in 2016, this modern hardware combination delivers performance that far exceeds the requirements of most contemporary titles, with the only sub-60 FPS result occurring at the extreme edge of 4K Ultra settings.