Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

76%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
180 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
95 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
114 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
62 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
65 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
32 FPS
8.5ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 45 51 65
1440p QHD 62 74 92 114
1080p Full HD 95 118 136 180

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 118
1920x1080 Low 180
1920x1080 Medium 136
1920x1080 Ultra 95
2560x1440 High 74
2560x1440 Low 114
2560x1440 Medium 92
2560x1440 Ultra 62
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 65
3840x2160 Medium 51
3840x2160 Ultra 32

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers a performance profile that is heavily dependent on resolution and preset selection in The Technomancer. Measured data shows this pairing is fully capable of exceeding the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p and 1440p across all tested settings, while 4K requires a significant compromise in visual fidelity to remain playable. The benchmark results reveal a clear scaling pattern where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, with the CPU’s role diminishing as pixel count increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces frame rates that range from excellent to exceptional. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 179.5, which is more than sufficient for high-refresh-rate displays. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 136.2 FPS, still leaving substantial headroom. High settings yield an average of 117.6 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 94.6 FPS. All four presets at this resolution stay far above the 60 FPS playability threshold, with even the lowest result (Ultra) remaining 57.7% above the target.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales downward but remains consistently playable. Low settings produce an average of 114 FPS, which is a 36.5% reduction compared to the same preset at 1080p. Medium settings average 92.2 FPS, High settings average 73.6 FPS, and Ultra settings average 61.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p is the closest any setting comes to the 60 FPS threshold across the entire 1440p category, yet it still clears it by 2.7%. This indicates that 1440p Ultra is viable, but there is minimal margin for performance fluctuation.

At 3840x2160, the performance picture becomes more constrained. Low settings average 64.9 FPS, which barely clears the 60 FPS threshold with an 8.2% margin. Medium settings drop to 50.8 FPS, falling 15.3% below the playability target. High settings average 44.7 FPS, which is 25.5% below the threshold, and Ultra settings sink to 32.3 FPS, a 46.2% deficit. The data shows a steep drop-off between Low and Medium at 4K, suggesting that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and raw compute are insufficient for higher presets at this resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the best settings that maintain at least 60 FPS are Ultra, which achieves an average of 94.6 FPS. This is the most demanding preset tested at this resolution, and it still delivers a 57.7% margin above the playability threshold. There is no reason to compromise on visual quality at 1080p, as even the heaviest workload remains comfortably playable.

For 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 61.6 FPS. This preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, but the margin is slim. The data indicates that 1440p Ultra is playable, though users seeking more consistent frame pacing might prefer High settings at 73.6 FPS, which offers a 19.5% higher average. However, strictly by the 60 FPS criterion, Ultra qualifies as the best playable preset.

For 3840x2160, the best settings are Low, with an average of 64.9 FPS. This is the only preset at 4K that reaches the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings fall short at 50.8 FPS, making Low the sole viable option for 4K gaming with this combination. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is substantial, representing a 21.7% performance loss, which underscores the GPU’s limitations at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination ranks 1679th out of 3696 tested combos in The Technomancer. This places it in the 45.4th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms roughly 45.4% of all tested combinations while being outperformed by the remaining 54.6%. This mid-pack ranking reflects the balanced nature of the pairing: neither component is a top-tier performer, but together they deliver solid 1080p and 1440p results.

The CPU alone sits in the 77th percentile among all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005. This is a strong showing, indicating that the Ryzen 5 8400F is a capable processor for gaming workloads. The GPU, however, sits in the 72nd percentile among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26331. The slight gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that the graphics card is the more limiting factor in this pairing, particularly at higher resolutions.

The combo’s rank of 1679 out of 3696 suggests that there are many other pairings that deliver better performance in this specific game. However, the ranking also implies that this combination is far from the bottom of the list, and its performance is respectable for a mid-range setup. The data shows that the combo’s overall standing is driven more by the GPU’s limitations at 4K than by any CPU deficiency.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has an average score of 24964, which is just 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 8400F’s 25005. This makes the 7500F a nearly identical performer in synthetic benchmarks, and users could expect similar frame rates in The Technomancer when paired with the same GPU. The Intel Core i7-11850H is 0.3% slower with a score of 24935, and the Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.4% slower at 24911. On the other side, the AMD EPYC 9474F is 0.4% faster at 25103, though this server-grade chip is not a typical gaming alternative. All four rivals fall within a 0.8% performance band, meaning the choice between them would have negligible impact on gameplay.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show a wider spread. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average score of 26011, which is 1.2% lower than the RTX 5060’s 26331. This makes the RX 6750 XT a close alternative, with slightly lower performance in synthetic tests. The AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 both score 26401 and 26421 respectively, which are 0.3% higher than the RTX 5060. These are integrated or entry-level mobile GPUs, so their similar synthetic scores are surprising but would likely translate differently in real gaming workloads. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, which is 0.8% higher. In practice, any of these GPUs would produce frame rates within a few percent of the RTX 5060 in The Technomancer, though the desktop cards (RX 6750 XT, RX 5700 XT) are more relevant comparisons than the mobile parts.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals distinct scaling patterns that clarify which component dominates at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more significant role than at higher resolutions, as the GPU is not fully saturated. The frame rate drops from 179.5 FPS at Low to 94.6 FPS at Ultra, a 47.3% reduction that is driven primarily by increased GPU workload. However, the CPU still has headroom, as evidenced by the high absolute frame rates. The gap between Low and Medium at 1080p is 43.3 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 19.4 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 23 FPS. This non-linear scaling suggests that the GPU becomes progressively more stressed as presets increase, but the CPU maintains sufficient throughput.

At 2560x1440, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced. The frame rate drops from 114 FPS at Low to 61.6 FPS at Ultra, a 46% reduction. The scaling from Low to Medium is 21.8 FPS, from Medium to High is 18.6 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 12 FPS. The diminishing returns at higher presets indicate that the GPU is nearing its limits, while the CPU still has capacity to spare. Comparing 1440p to 1080p at the same preset, the performance drop is 36.5% at Low, 32.3% at Medium, 37.4% at High, and 34.9% at Ultra. This consistent 32-37% reduction across presets points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck, as the resolution increase directly impacts pixel throughput.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor. The frame rate drops from 64.9 FPS at Low to 32.3 FPS at Ultra, a 50.2% reduction. The scaling from Low to Medium is 14.1 FPS, from Medium to High is 6.1 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 12.4 FPS. The 4K results are significantly lower than 1440p across all presets: 43.1% lower at Low, 44.9% lower at Medium, 39.3% lower at High, and 47.6% lower at Ultra. This severe degradation confirms that the RTX 5060’s 8 GB memory capacity and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K gaming at higher presets. The CPU’s role at 4K is minimal, as the GPU is unable to feed frames fast enough to stress the processor.

The Verdict

This PC can run The Technomancer at 1920x1080 with all presets, including Ultra, which averages 94.6 FPS. The 60 FPS threshold is cleared by a wide margin at every setting, making 1080p the ideal resolution for this combination. At 2560x1440, the system also runs all presets, with Ultra averaging 61.6 FPS. This is playable, but the margin is slim, so users prioritizing stability might opt for High at 73.6 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, averaging 64.9 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 50.8, 44.7, and 32.3 FPS respectively. The verdict is clear: this combo is a strong 1080p and capable 1440p performer, but 4K gaming requires significant graphical compromises.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: Ultra settings average 94.6 FPS at 1080p, which is the most demanding preset tested and still clears the 60 FPS threshold by 57.7%.

Q: Can this combination handle 2560x1440 at Ultra settings?

A: Yes, Ultra at 1440p averages 61.6 FPS, which is just 2.7% above the 60 FPS playability threshold. It is playable, but High settings at 73.6 FPS offer more headroom.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this PC?

A: At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, with an average of 64.9 FPS. Medium drops to 50.8 FPS, High to 44.7 FPS, and Ultra to 32.3 FPS, all below the 60 FPS target.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8400F compare to the Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25005, while the 7500F scores 24964, a difference of 0.2%. In gaming, the two CPUs would perform nearly identically.

Q: What GPU is closest in performance to the RTX 5060?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average score of 26011, which is 1.2% lower than the RTX 5060’s 26331. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% higher at 26553.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in this game?

A: This combination ranks 1679th out of 3696 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the 45.4th percentile of all tested systems.