Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
266 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
152 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
195 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
100 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
107 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
55 FPS
5.1ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 55 70 82 107
1440p QHD 100 128 149 195
1080p Full HD 152 195 229 266

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 195
1920x1080 Low 266
1920x1080 Medium 229
1920x1080 Ultra 152
2560x1440 High 128
2560x1440 Low 195
2560x1440 Medium 149
2560x1440 Ultra 100
3840x2160 High 70
3840x2160 Low 107
3840x2160 Medium 82
3840x2160 Ultra 55

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers a remarkably strong performance profile in The Technomancer, with benchmark data showing this pairing ranks in the 92nd percentile of tested configurations (rank 287 out of 3696). The measured FPS results reveal a system that handles the game's demanding Action RPG environments with substantial headroom across most resolutions and presets, though the most extreme 4K Ultra settings push the hardware to its limits.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Low preset produces an average of 266 FPS, while Medium achieves 229 FPS with a minimum of 194 FPS and a maximum of 263 FPS. High settings yield 195 FPS average, and even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains a robust 152 FPS average. None of these configurations dip below the playable threshold, indicating the RTX 4080 and Ryzen 5 8400F have substantial performance reserves at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains excellent but shows the expected scaling from increased pixel count. The Low preset delivers 195 FPS average, Medium reaches 149 FPS with a floor of 127 FPS and ceiling of 172 FPS, and High settings produce 128 FPS. The Ultra preset still comfortably clears the 60 FPS bar with a 100 FPS average, demonstrating that this resolution is well within the hardware's comfort zone. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 95 FPS, showing a 48.7% performance drop when moving to maximum quality settings.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes noticeably. The Low preset achieves 107 FPS, Medium runs at 82 FPS with minimum and maximum values of 70 and 94 FPS respectively, and High settings produce 70 FPS average. However, the Ultra preset drops to 55 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This represents the first configuration where the combination cannot maintain playable frame rates, with the gap between Low and Ultra widening to 52 FPS (a 48.6% reduction). The data shows a clear performance cliff between High and Ultra at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling patterns across resolutions reveal how the workload shifts between the Ryzen 5 8400F and RTX 4080. At 1080p, the system achieves 266 FPS on Low settings, which indicates the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at very high frame rates. The 8400F's Zen 4 architecture with 6 cores and 12 threads provides sufficient single-thread performance for the game's engine, as evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943.

As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes progressively more dominant. The RTX 4080's 9728 shading units and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance handle the increased pixel workload, while the CPU's role diminishes relative to overall system performance. The measured data shows that moving from 1080p Ultra (152 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (100 FPS) represents a 34.2% performance reduction, while moving from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra (55 FPS) shows a 45% reduction. These scaling factors indicate that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

The preset scaling at 4K is particularly revealing. Low to Medium shows a 23.4% performance decrease (107 to 82 FPS), Medium to High shows a 14.6% decrease (82 to 70 FPS), and High to Ultra shows a 21.4% decrease (70 to 55 FPS). This non-linear scaling suggests the game's Ultra preset introduces effects that are particularly demanding on the GPU's rasterization pipeline, likely related to the 112 ROPs and 280.6 GPixel/s pixel fill rate being saturated.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset at 152 FPS average is the optimal choice. This configuration delivers the highest visual quality while maintaining frame rates that are more than double the playable threshold. The minimum FPS data is not available for this preset, but the average of 152 FPS provides substantial headroom above any potential dips.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset at 100 FPS average is the recommended selection. This maintains the maximum visual fidelity while staying comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The 100 FPS average leaves room for demanding scenes to potentially dip but should remain playable throughout.

For 3840x2160, the High preset at 70 FPS average is the best option that maintains playability. While Medium runs at 82 FPS and Low at 107 FPS, High offers the best visual quality while staying above the 60 FPS floor. The Ultra preset at 55 FPS falls short of the playable threshold and should be avoided unless the user prioritizes visual quality over smooth gameplay. The medium preset's minimum of 70 FPS suggests that High would likely maintain at least 60 FPS in most scenes, though the data does not provide minimum values for this preset.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in aggregated benchmark scores demonstrate that the Ryzen 5 8400F's performance profile is closely matched by several alternatives. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24964 versus the 8400F's 25005, a negligible 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935 (0.3% slower), the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911 (0.4% slower), and the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103 (0.4% faster). These results indicate that any of these processors would produce virtually identical frame rates in The Technomancer, with the game's CPU demands being well within the capabilities of all these chips.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match with an average score of 54209 versus the RTX 4080's 54247, a mere 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (1.1% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (2.6% faster), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (2.7% faster). These deltas are all within a small margin, suggesting that swapping to any of these GPUs would yield very similar gameplay experiences. The RTX 4080 SUPER would be the most direct substitute, while the AMD options might show slightly higher average frame rates though unlikely to change the playability verdict at any resolution.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that this system can run The Technomancer effectively at most settings. At 1920x1080, all four presets exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra delivering 152 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets also remain playable, with Ultra achieving 100 FPS. At 3840x2160, the High preset at 70 FPS is the most demanding playable option, while Low (107 FPS) and Medium (82 FPS) also clear the threshold. The Ultra preset at 4K fails to maintain 60 FPS with its 55 FPS average.

The verdict by resolution confirms this analysis: 1080p and 1440p support all settings including Ultra, while 4K supports High, Medium, and Low but not Ultra. The system is exceptionally well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and can handle 4K gaming with high-quality settings. The RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth provide ample resources for the game's textures and effects at higher resolutions, though the Ultra preset at 4K exceeds the system's capabilities.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run The Technomancer at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 55 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset at 70 FPS is the best playable option at this resolution.

Q: What is the highest playable preset at 1920x1080?

A: The Ultra preset achieves 152 FPS average at 1080p, making it the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. All presets at this resolution exceed the playable threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest GPU rival in overall benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4080 scores 54247 on average, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209. This represents a 0.1% difference, indicating near-identical performance levels.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 8400F a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests minimal bottlenecking, as the system achieves 266 FPS on Low settings and 152 FPS on Ultra at 1920x1080. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943 indicate sufficient processing power for high frame rates.

Q: What resolution and settings combination provides the best balance of visual quality and performance?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset at 100 FPS average offers maximum visual quality while maintaining well above the 60 FPS threshold. This provides a 45 FPS margin over the playable minimum.

Q: Does the system maintain playable frame rates in demanding scenes at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset at 1440p shows a minimum of 127 FPS and maximum of 172 FPS. While minimum values are not available for the Ultra preset, its 100 FPS average provides a substantial buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting it should remain playable even in demanding scenes.