Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

85%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
281 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
173 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
220 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
113 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
121 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
62 FPS
4.5ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 26,324
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 62 79 93 121
1440p QHD 113 144 169 220
1080p Full HD 173 221 256 281

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 221
1920x1080 Low 281
1920x1080 Medium 256
1920x1080 Ultra 173
2560x1440 High 144
2560x1440 Low 220
2560x1440 Medium 169
2560x1440 Ultra 113
3840x2160 High 79
3840x2160 Low 121
3840x2160 Medium 93
3840x2160 Ultra 62

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers exceptional performance in The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG. Benchmark results show this combination produces frame rates far exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold across every tested resolution and preset, making it a top-tier option for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces extremely high frame rates across all settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 281 FPS, while Medium reaches 256 FPS with a minimum of 217 FPS and a maximum of 294 FPS. High settings yield 221 FPS on average, and the Ultra preset still maintains 173 FPS. These numbers indicate the CPU and GPU combination is heavily front-end limited at this resolution, with even the most demanding settings leaving substantial headroom.

Moving to 2560x1440, the measured averages remain robust. Low settings produce 220 FPS, Medium delivers 169 FPS with a minimum of 144 and maximum of 195 FPS, High achieves 144 FPS, and Ultra drops to 113 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a modest reduction in frame rates, with the Ultra preset falling from 173 to 113 FPS, a 35% decrease, while the Low preset only drops from 281 to 220 FPS, a 22% reduction.

At 3840x2160, the performance remains highly playable but shows the expected resolution penalty. Low settings average 121 FPS, Medium produces 93 FPS with a range of 79 to 107 FPS, High reaches 79 FPS, and Ultra settles at 62 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 59 FPS, whereas at 1440p the same comparison shows a 107 FPS difference, indicating the GPU is becoming a more significant factor as pixel count rises.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 173 FPS. This is nearly three times the 60 FPS threshold, so there is no reason to compromise on visual quality at this resolution. The data confirms that all four presets clear the playability bar easily.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again provides the highest visual quality while maintaining 113 FPS on average. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, offering smooth gameplay with maximum settings. The Medium preset at 169 FPS could be used for higher refresh rate displays, but Ultra remains comfortably playable.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves 62 FPS on average, which is just above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data shows this is the most demanding combination tested, yet it still clears the threshold. For users who prefer a larger margin, the High preset at 79 FPS or Medium at 93 FPS provide additional headroom while sacrificing some visual fidelity.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern in component scaling across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the performance gap between Low and Ultra settings is 108 FPS (281 vs 173), which indicates the CPU's role in maintaining high frame rates. The Ryzen 5 7600 with its 6 cores and 12 threads shows strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and PassMark single-thread score of 3910, which helps sustain these high averages.

At 2560x1440, the spread between Low and Ultra narrows to 107 FPS (220 vs 113), nearly identical to 1080p. This suggests the CPU remains relevant even as resolution increases, but the GPU is beginning to contribute more to the overall performance equation. The RTX 5090's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth provide ample resources for this resolution class.

At 3840x2160, the gap between Low and Ultra compresses to 59 FPS (121 vs 62), demonstrating that the GPU becomes the dominant factor at this resolution. The RTX 5090's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are being taxed more heavily, while the CPU's 3.80 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost clocks provide sufficient headroom for frame pacing. The scaling from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra shows a 64% reduction in average FPS, while the same resolution jump at Low settings shows a 57% reduction, confirming the GPU's growing influence at higher pixel counts.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 5 7600's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, which scores 26,274 versus 26,324 for the 7600, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is 0.3% slower at 26,402, while the Intel Core i9-11900KF trails by 0.4% with a score of 26,212. The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U is 0.5% behind at 26,187. These deltas are negligible in gaming terms, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in The Technomancer.

For the GPU side, the RTX 5090's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which scores 79,605 versus 79,842 for the 5090, a 0.3% difference. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB is 0.6% slower at 79,396, while the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is 1.1% behind at 78,940. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X actually scores 1.4% higher at 80,959, though this margin is within normal benchmark variance. In practice, these GPUs would deliver comparable performance in The Technomancer, with differences of only a few frames per second at most settings.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination ranks 94th out of 3,696 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the top 2.5% of all configurations evaluated. The percentile data supports this positioning: the CPU sits in the 78th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 92nd percentile against all GPUs. This places the combo well above the median configuration, and the measured frame rates reflect this high standing.

The ranking indicates that while there are 93 combinations that perform better, these likely involve even more powerful CPUs or specialized configurations. For a mainstream desktop CPU paired with a flagship GPU, this result represents near-top-tier performance for this specific game.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 4K resolution?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves 62 FPS on average, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings reach 79 FPS and Medium hits 93 FPS.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1440p?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 deliver 113 FPS on average, making it the most demanding preset that stays well above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in this game?

A: The RTX 5090 scores 79,842 on average, which is 0.3% higher than the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and 0.6% higher than the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB. The RX 6850M XT trails by 1.1%, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X leads by 1.4%.

Q: Which component has a larger impact on performance at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU appears more influential, as the Ryzen 5 7600 maintains high frame rates across all presets, with Low at 281 FPS and Ultra at 173 FPS. The CPU's single-thread score of 999 in 3DMark supports this.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 4K?

A: Yes, but just barely. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 62 FPS, only 2 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. For a more comfortable margin, High at 79 FPS is recommended.

Q: How many total combinations does this setup rank above?

A: This combo ranks 94th out of 3,696 tested combinations, meaning it performs better than 3,602 other configurations in The Technomancer.

The Verdict

This PC can run The Technomancer exceptionally well. At 1920x1080, all presets clear 60 FPS with ease, and the Ultra preset averages 173 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers 113 FPS, providing smooth gameplay with maximum visual settings. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset maintains 62 FPS, just above the playability threshold, while High settings at 79 FPS offer a safer margin.

The data shows that the Ultra preset is the best setting at every resolution tested, with 4K being the only scenario where performance approaches the 60 FPS limit. For users with high refresh rate displays at 1440p or 1080p, the Medium preset at 169 or 256 FPS respectively provides even smoother motion, though the visual quality reduction may not be necessary given the already high Ultra performance. The combination of the Ryzen 5 7600 and RTX 5090 ranks in the top 2.5% of all tested configurations, indicating it is a strong choice for this game and likely similar titles from its era.