Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Technomancer
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 13 | 17 | 20 | 26 |
| 1440p QHD | 24 | 31 | 36 | 47 |
| 1080p Full HD | 37 | 47 | 55 | 71 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System
Similar Performance Alternatives
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. Its average benchmark score of 26324 places it within 0.5% of several nearby processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 26274, a 0.2% gap. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS reaches 26402, running 0.3% ahead. The Intel Core i9-11900KF posts 26212, 0.4% behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U lands at 26187, 0.5% off. In practical terms, swapping between any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in The Technomancer, since the game's performance ceiling at lower resolutions is dictated more by the graphics solution than by processor differences.
The Intel Arc B370 presents a more isolated situation. Its only recorded benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, returns a score of 1184. The nearest rivals are older discrete and mobile parts: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186 (0.2% higher), ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190 (0.5% higher), AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192 (0.7% higher), and AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168 (1.4% lower). These deltas are trivial, so anyone considering an Arc B370 should expect performance essentially equivalent to those legacy GPUs. The B370 ranks in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, confirming it sits far down the performance ladder. For a game like The Technomancer, this means the GPU is the binding constraint; the CPU's 78th percentile standing among all processors is not the limiting factor.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at 1080p with High settings?
A: No. The recorded average at 1920x1080 High is 47 FPS, which falls 13 FPS short of the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only Low settings reach the target.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?
A: None. At 2560x1440, every preset fails to reach 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 47 FPS average, followed by Medium at 36 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 24 FPS.
Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It is within 1.4% of all four nearest rivals: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192), and AMD FirePro M2000 (1168). The B370's 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates entry-level positioning.
Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7600 bottleneck the Arc B370?
A: The opposite is true. The CPU's average benchmark score of 26324 puts it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 5th percentile. The GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU has ample headroom, with a single-thread score of 3910 in PassMark and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735.
Q: What frame rate does 4K Ultra produce?
A: 13 FPS average. That is the lowest recorded result in the entire dataset. Even 4K Low only reaches 26 FPS average, so 4K is not viable for playable frame rates.
Q: Is the Arc B370's performance closer to a modern integrated GPU or a dedicated card?
A: The recorded data shows it matches legacy dedicated GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 is essentially identical to the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190) and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186), both of which are over a decade old. The 25 W TDP and IGP form factor reflect its integrated-class positioning.
How This Combo Ranks
Among 3696 tested combinations in the database, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3408th for The Technomancer. That places it in the bottom 7.8% of all recorded combos. The ranking reflects the GPU's severe limitation: despite a strong CPU, the graphics solution cannot push frame rates into playable territory except at the lowest settings at 1080p. The combination outperforms only 288 other tested pairings, which indicates that nearly all other hardware configurations deliver better results in this title. The CPU's 78th percentile standing does not rescue the overall rank, because the game's frame rate at the tested resolutions is overwhelmingly GPU-bound. The recorded data shows a clear pattern: the Arc B370's 5th percentile GPU ranking dominates the combo's outcome.
The Verdict
This PC can run The Technomancer, but only under narrow conditions. The verdict data shows exactly one playable configuration: 1920x1080 with Low settings, producing an average of 71 FPS. No settings at 2560x1440 reach the 60 FPS playable threshold. The closest 1440p result is Low at 47 FPS. At 3840x2160, even the lowest preset fails to reach 30 FPS, with Low averaging 26 FPS. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and only the 1080p Low preset clears it. For anyone who owns this hardware, the practical takeaway is to run the game at 1080p with the lowest preset, or accept sub-60 frame rates at higher resolutions. Higher presets at 1080p fall short: Medium averages 55 FPS, High averages 47 FPS, and Ultra averages 37 FPS. The system is not suited for high-refresh or high-resolution play in this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly poor. Low settings average 26 FPS. Medium averages 20 FPS, with a minimum of 17 and a maximum of 23. High averages 17 FPS. Ultra averages 13 FPS. No 4K preset comes close to the 60 FPS threshold; the highest recorded value across all 4K settings is 26 FPS on Low.
At 2560x1440, performance improves but remains below playable. Low settings average 47 FPS. Medium averages 36 FPS, with a minimum of 30 and a maximum of 41. High averages 31 FPS. Ultra averages 24 FPS. The best 1440p result is 47 FPS, which is 13 FPS short of the playable threshold.
At 1920x1080, the picture changes. Low settings average 71 FPS, the only preset in the entire dataset to cross the 60 FPS line. Medium averages 55 FPS, with a minimum of 47 and a maximum of 63. High averages 47 FPS. Ultra averages 37 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 34 FPS, showing that the graphics settings have a substantial impact on this hardware. The minimum recorded frame rate at 1080p Medium is 47 FPS, which means even that preset dips below the playable threshold during demanding scenes.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The best recorded average is 26 FPS on Low, but that fails the playable threshold. The verdict data confirms no playable settings exist at 4K for this combination.
At 2560x1440, the same conclusion applies. No preset reaches 60 FPS. Low settings produce the highest average at 47 FPS, but the verdict list shows no playable settings at this resolution. The gap from 47 to 60 FPS is too large for any settings tweak to bridge, since even the lowest preset is already in use.
At 1920x1080, Low settings are the only playable option, with an average of 71 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS threshold by 11 FPS. Medium settings average 55 FPS, which is 5 FPS short of playable, and its minimum of 47 FPS means noticeable dips. High and Ultra average 47 FPS and 37 FPS respectively. The recommendation is unambiguous: run The Technomancer at 1080p Low for a consistent experience above 60 FPS. Any attempt to raise the preset will drop the average below the playable line, and the minimum frame rates will fall further. The data does not support running this game at higher resolutions with this GPU, regardless of the CPU's capability. The Ryzen 5 7600 has the processing headroom, but the Arc B370's 5th percentile GPU ranking caps the achievable frame rates. This is a 1080p Low configuration for The Technomancer, and nothing more.