Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Technomancer
Action RPG 2016

The Technomancer

81%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
138 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
70 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
90 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
46 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
49 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
25 FPS
11.1ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,436
Your CPU 32,750
Graphics Card
Required 27,947
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 32 38 49
1440p QHD 46 59 69 90
1080p Full HD 70 90 106 138

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 90
1920x1080 Low 138
1920x1080 Medium 106
1920x1080 Ultra 70
2560x1440 High 59
2560x1440 Low 90
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 Ultra 46
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 49
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 Ultra 25

Performance Analysis: The Technomancer on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B580 combination presents a clear performance profile for The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG. The measured data reveals a system that is decisively capable at 1080p and 1440p, but which hits a hard wall at 4K. The benchmark results indicate a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions, with the CPU having ample headroom to spare.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The frame rate data for this pairing spans three resolutions and four quality presets, offering a comprehensive view of its scaling behavior. At the demanding 3840x2160 resolution, the system is pushed to its limits. The High preset yields an average of 32 FPS, while the Medium preset manages a 38 FPS average with a recorded floor of 32 FPS and a ceiling of 44 FPS. Dropping to Low improves the average to 49 FPS, but the Ultra preset sinks to an unplayable 25 FPS average. None of these 4K figures approach the 60 FPS playability threshold, marking this resolution as a definitive miss for this title on this hardware.

Moving down to the more common 2560x1440 resolution shows a significant improvement. The Ultra preset here is still demanding, producing a 46 FPS average. However, the High preset comes tantalizingly close to the target with a 59 FPS average. The Medium preset comfortably clears the bar, posting an average of 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS. The Low preset is the clear performance leader at this resolution, delivering a brisk 90 FPS average.

The 1920x1080 resolution results are where this system truly shines. At Ultra settings, the game still renders at a very playable 70 FPS average. The High preset pushes that to 90 FPS. The Medium preset achieves an average of 106 FPS, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS. Finally, the Low preset produces a high-refresh-rate-friendly 138 FPS average. The data here shows a smooth and consistent scaling where even the most demanding preset maintains a comfortable frame rate.

Best Settings per Resolution

Given the 60 FPS playability threshold, the benchmark data points to a single clear best setting for two of the three tested resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is unambiguous. The data shows that no preset, from Low to Ultra, can achieve a 60 FPS average. The highest average is 49 FPS on the Low preset, which is still well below the target. There is no "best" setting at this resolution because none are playable; it is effectively a no-go zone for this hardware.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is Medium. While the High preset is an option at 59 FPS, it misses the 60 FPS average target by a single frame. The Medium preset is the most demanding that clears the threshold, delivering a 69 FPS average. This is the recommended choice for a smooth experience at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra. The system handles the most demanding preset with ease, producing a 70 FPS average. This result confirms that the system is not only capable but has performance headroom to spare. The 70 FPS average is well above the playable threshold, allowing for a fully maxed-out visual experience without sacrificing fluidity.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a compelling story about which component is the limiting factor. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at the Ultra preset is instructive. At 1080p, the average is 70 FPS, which drops to 46 FPS at 1440p, and then collapses to 25 FPS at 4K. This massive performance degradation as resolution increases is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario. The Intel Arc B580 is the constraining factor at these higher resolutions, especially at the more demanding visual settings.

The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, appears to have more than enough power for this title. The 1080p results, where CPU load is typically highest, show exceptionally high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the system pushes 138 FPS, and even at the Ultra preset, it maintains a 70 FPS average. The fact that frame rates scale so well at this resolution indicates the CPU is keeping up with the GPU's output, not bottlenecking it. The single-core performance is more than sufficient for a game from 2016.

The role of the GPU is further highlighted when comparing the 4K results. The jump from Low (49 FPS) to Ultra (25 FPS) is a steep drop, showing how the computational load on the GPU quickly becomes severe as image quality increases. The CPU's performance is constant, so the entire frame rate swing is attributed to the graphics card. In summary, the Ryzen 5 7400F provides a stable, powerful foundation, but the Arc B580's capabilities define the ceiling for playability, particularly at 1440p and 4K.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run The Technomancer at 4K resolution?

A: No. The measured data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The best average FPS is 49 on the Low preset, with Ultra dropping to 25 FPS. All results fall short of the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for a 60 FPS experience at 2560x1440?

A: The Medium preset is the best choice that stays at or above the 60 FPS target, delivering a 69 FPS average. The High preset is close with a 59 FPS average, but it just misses the threshold.

Q: Can this system handle the game at maximum settings?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080. At this resolution, the Ultra preset maintains a 70 FPS average. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset results in a 46 FPS average, which is not playable.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F is very competitive. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. It is also 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H in average benchmark scores.

Q: Is the GPU more powerful than an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?

A: The data suggests a near-tie. The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score that is 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, but it is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3080. It is also 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP.

Q: What is the frame rate range on the Medium preset at 1080p?

A: The benchmark shows an average of 106 FPS, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS. This indicates a very smooth and consistent experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the average benchmark scores, a few other CPUs and GPUs would behave similarly to the components in this test system.

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F sits in a tight cluster of rivals. The Intel Core i5-14600T is the closest match, with a mere 0.1% difference in average score. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 also perform almost identically, with 0.2% and 0.3% differences, respectively. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is slightly ahead, but still within a 0.2% difference. In practical terms for this game, any of these processors would yield very similar frame rates.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580 is similarly matched with some high-profile cards. The average benchmark score is 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, suggesting players with that older flagship card would see nearly identical performance. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP is also a close alternative, being only 0.2% slower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a bit faster, showing a 0.7% lead, but the difference is small enough that the in-game experience would be comparable in this title. The NVIDIA P106-100 is the nearest rival listed, being just 1% behind the Arc B580.

The Verdict

The data provides a clear answer. This PC can run The Technomancer, but the experience varies by resolution. At 1920x1080, this system is a champion. It can run every preset, including Ultra, at a comfortable 70 FPS average. This is the sweet spot for this hardware.

At 2560x1440, the system is still very capable, but requires some compromise. It can run the game at the Medium preset with a 69 FPS average, which is a perfect balance of visual fidelity and performance. The High preset is a close miss at 59 FPS, so it's best to stick with Medium for a locked-in 60+ FPS experience.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. The data shows that it is not capable of producing a playable frame rate at any quality setting. The 4K resolution is simply too demanding for the Intel Arc B580 in this game. Therefore, the verdict is mixed: it is a solid performer at 1080p and 1440p, but a non-starter for 4K gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

Looking at the broader context of all tested system combinations, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B580 holds a specific position. The data shows it ranks #2787 out of 3696 total combinations tested for The Technomancer. This puts it in the 75th percentile, meaning it is outperformed by a significant majority of the systems in the database. This is a sobering statistic, as it highlights that while this system is capable of running the game at 1080p and 1440p, many other hardware combinations can do the same or better. Thus, while the system offers a playable experience, it is not a top-tier setup for this specific title.