The Technomancer

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Arc B570 combination is being analyzed for its performance in The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG. The data provided does not include any measured frame rates, resolution-specific results, or preset-specific benchmarks for this title. Consequently, the analysis below relies on the hardware specifications and synthetic benchmark scores from the FACT PACK to assess potential performance, while clearly stating the absence of empirical game data.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The FACT PACK contains no `measuredFps` entries for this game, no `verdictByResolution` data, and no per-setting performance metrics. This means there are no exact average, minimum, or maximum FPS figures available for any resolution or graphics preset. Without this data, a numerical breakdown of frame rates across 1080p, 1440p, or 4K cannot be provided.

The `dataIsMeasured` field is set to `false`, confirming that the performance figures are not derived from in-game testing. The `playableThresholdFps` is defined as 60, but no actual FPS values exist to compare against this threshold.

Given the absence of measured frame rates, any statement about the FPS at specific resolutions or settings would be speculative. The hardware's synthetic scores—such as the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10551 and the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14195—offer a general sense of capability, but they do not translate directly to frame rates in The Technomancer.

CPU and GPU Roles

Examining the scaling between the CPU and GPU benchmarks provides insight into which component likely dominates at various resolutions, though this is inferential rather than measured.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with 6 cores and 12 threads. Its single-thread performance in Cinebench R23 is 1409, and multicore is 10551. This CPU is positioned at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21088. The Intel Arc B570, meanwhile, has a boost clock of 2500 MHz, 2304 shading units, and a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. Its Passmark G3D score is 14195, placing it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs.

In a typical game, the CPU's role is more prominent at lower resolutions (1080p) where the GPU can render frames quickly, potentially making the CPU a bottleneck. At higher resolutions (1440p or 4K), the GPU's workload increases, and the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The data shows the CPU's single-thread score is modest (1409 in Cinebench R23), which might struggle to feed a fast GPU at 1080p in CPU-intensive scenes. However, the GPU's bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s and pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s suggest it can handle higher resolutions, but the lack of game-specific data prevents a definitive conclusion.

The scaling between presets is also absent. Higher presets typically increase GPU load, shifting the balance toward the GPU. Without measured FPS, the exact component roles cannot be quantified, but the hardware characteristics suggest the CPU may be more impactful at 1080p and the GPU at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals list for the CPU includes four processors with average scores very close to the Ryzen 5 5600G's 21088. The Intel Core i3-1220P has an avgScore of 21066, a deltaPct of 0.1% (meaning it is 0.1% faster). The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V scores 21112, a deltaPct of -0.1% (0.1% slower). The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U scores 21133, a deltaPct of -0.2%, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U scores 21174, a deltaPct of -0.4%. These deltas are negligible, indicating that all four rivals would provide nearly identical CPU performance in The Technomancer.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570's nearestRivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with an avgScore of 20534 (deltaPct 0.1%), the Intel Arc A750 with 20582 (deltaPct -0.1%), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M with 20480 (deltaPct 0.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X with 20662 (deltaPct -0.5%). All of these are within 0.5% of the Arc B570's score of 20556, suggesting they would perform nearly identically in this game.

Thus, hardware buyers could expect similar behavior from the Intel Core i3-1220P or the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V when paired with the Arc B570, or alternatively, the Arc B570 could be swapped for an Arc A750 without a meaningful change in FPS. The data shows these alternatives are within a fraction of a percent, so the performance difference would be imperceptible in practice.

The Verdict

The `verdictByResolution` field is empty in the FACT PACK. There are no specific resolutions (e.g., 1080p, 1440p, 4K) with associated FPS values or preset names that clear the 60 FPS threshold. Without measured data, it is impossible to state definitively whether this PC can run The Technomancer at 60 FPS at any resolution.

The playable threshold is set at 60 FPS, but no data exists to compare. The hardware's synthetic scores are respectable—the CPU ranks in the 74th percentile and the GPU in the 65th percentile—but these do not guarantee playable frame rates. The game is from 2016, and the hardware is modern (the GPU launched in 2025), which might suggest it could handle the game, but that is speculation, not a fact from the pack.

Therefore, the verdict is inconclusive. The data shows no measured performance, so a clear statement about which resolutions and presets achieve 60 FPS cannot be made. The absence of data means this combo's ability to run the game remains unverified.

FAQ

Q: Does the FACT PACK include any measured FPS for The Technomancer?

A: No. The `measuredFps` array is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is set to `false`. There are no average, minimum, or maximum FPS values for any resolution or preset.

Q: What is the playable threshold for this game?

A: The `playableThresholdFps` is defined as 60. However, no FPS data is available to compare against this threshold.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600G has an average benchmark score of 21088. Its closest rival is the Intel Core i3-1220P with a score of 21066 (0.1% faster), followed by the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V at 21112 (-0.1% slower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U at 21133 (-0.2% slower), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U at 21174 (-0.4% slower).

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (0.1% slower), the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (0.1% faster), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480 (0.4% slower), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662 (0.5% faster).

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G ranks in the 74th percentile among all CPUs, with scores like 10551 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1409 in single-core.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Arc B570 ranks in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 14195 and a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

How This Combo Ranks

The FACT PACK provides a `comboRankInGame` of rank 1 out of 3696 combos. This indicates that, among all tested combinations in the database, this specific CPU-GPU pairing is the top performer. The rank is 1, and the total number of combos is 3696, meaning this combo outperforms all other 3695 tested combinations.

This ranking is based on the hardware's benchmark scores, not on measured game FPS. The CPU's average benchmark score of 21088 and the GPU's average of 20556 contribute to this top ranking, but the lack of game-specific data means the ranking reflects synthetic performance rather than actual frame rates in The Technomancer.

Best Settings per Resolution

The FACT PACK does not contain any settings recommendations or FPS data per resolution. The `verdictByResolution` field is empty, and there are no entries for the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 1080p, 1440p, or 4K.

Consequently, the best settings per resolution cannot be determined. There is no information on which presets achieve 60 FPS or higher, so no exact FPS values can be cited. The only relevant fact is the playable threshold of 60 FPS, but without measured data, any settings guidance would be unfounded.

In summary, this analysis is constrained by the FACT PACK's lack of game-specific benchmark data. While the hardware shows strong synthetic scores and a top combo rank, the absence of measured FPS means no conclusions about playability, settings, or resolution-specific performance can be drawn. The data only supports statements about the hardware's relative standing among other tested components.