Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
The Medium
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 37 | 48 | 79 |
| 1440p QHD | 36 | 41 | 60 | 100 |
| 1080p Full HD | 40 | 51 | 71 | 114 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: The Medium on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 presents a specific performance profile for The Medium, a horror title that demands careful attention to settings. The measured data, derived from direct frame-time capture, shows that this combination is capable of delivering playable performance, but only within a narrow band of configurations. Across all tested resolutions, the average frame rates range from 24.6 FPS at 4K Ultra to 113.9 FPS at 1080p Low. The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, and the system clears this bar at 4K only with Low settings, at 1440p with Low and Medium settings, and at 1080p with Low and Medium settings. The Ultra preset remains out of reach at every resolution, and High settings also fall short of 60 FPS across the board. These results indicate a system that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher quality levels, while the processor provides sufficient headroom at lower presets. The following analysis breaks down these numbers resolution by resolution, examines the balance between CPU and GPU load, and provides guidance on optimal settings based solely on the data in the fact pack.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rate data for this combination is organized by resolution and preset, with average FPS values provided for each configuration. No minimum or maximum frame rate data is available in the dataset, so the analysis relies entirely on average performance.
At 1920x1080, the system achieves its highest raw performance. With Low settings, the average frame rate is 113.9 FPS, which is the fastest result across the entire test matrix. Moving to Medium settings drops the average to 70.9 FPS, still comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings reduce performance further to 51.3 FPS, which falls below the playable bar. The Ultra preset delivers 40.2 FPS, the lowest result at this resolution. The scaling from Low to Medium represents a 37.8% reduction in frame rate, while the step from Medium to High costs another 27.7%. The jump from High to Ultra is smaller in relative terms, a 21.6% decrease, but the absolute result is far from smooth.
At 2560x1440, the pattern shifts. Low settings produce an average of 99.9 FPS, which remains highly playable. Medium settings drop to 60.4 FPS, just barely clearing the 60 FPS threshold. This is a critical data point: the system is playable at 1440p Medium, but with almost no headroom. High settings fall to 41.3 FPS, a 31.6% reduction from Medium, and Ultra settings deliver only 35.6 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is 13.8%, indicating diminishing returns from the most demanding preset. Notably, the gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 39.5 FPS, or 39.5% of the Low score, which shows that the Medium preset imposes a substantial load on the GPU.
At 3840x2160, performance collapses under the weight of the higher pixel count. Low settings yield an average of 78.9 FPS, which is still playable and represents the only 4K configuration that clears 60 FPS. Medium settings drop to 48.4 FPS, a 38.7% reduction from Low. High settings fall to 36.7 FPS, and Ultra delivers just 24.6 FPS. The Ultra result is less than one-third of the 1080p Low score, underscoring the extreme demand of 4K Ultra on this hardware. The progression from Low to Medium to High to Ultra at 4K shows a consistent decline of roughly 10-12 FPS per step, with the largest relative drop occurring between Low and Medium.
Comparing across resolutions at the same preset, the scaling is revealing. At Medium settings, the system moves from 70.9 FPS at 1080p to 60.4 FPS at 1440p, a 14.8% reduction, and then to 48.4 FPS at 4K, a further 19.9% reduction. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 12.3%, and from 1440p to 4K is 21.0%. These percentages indicate that the GPU becomes the limiting factor more aggressively as resolution increases, which is expected given the fixed compute resources of the RTX 5060.
CPU and GPU Roles
The interplay between the Intel Core i5-12600KF and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in The Medium can be inferred from the scaling behavior across resolutions and presets. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, has a strong multithreaded benchmark score of 27799 average, placing it in the 79th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, meanwhile, has an average benchmark score of 26331 and sits in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. These percentile ranks suggest both components are mid-to-upper tier, but the game’s performance profile indicates which one dominates.
At 1080p with Low settings, the system reaches 113.9 FPS. This is the highest frame rate in the dataset, and it suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at this resolution and preset. The fact that Low settings at 1080p produce such a high score implies that the CPU is not the bottleneck here; otherwise, the frame rate would plateau regardless of GPU load. However, as settings increase to Medium and then High, the frame rate drops significantly, even at 1080p. This drop is a clear sign that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor, as higher presets increase shading, texture, and lighting demands that fall on the graphics card.
At 1440p, the CPU’s role diminishes further. The difference between 1080p and 1440p at Low settings is only 14.0 FPS (from 113.9 to 99.9), which is a modest reduction compared to the resolution’s pixel count increase of 78%. This relatively small drop indicates that the CPU still has headroom, and the GPU is handling the extra pixels without a massive penalty. But at Medium settings, the 1440p score of 60.4 FPS is exactly at the playable threshold, suggesting that the GPU is now working near its limit. The CPU is likely still not the bottleneck, as the i5-12600KF’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 indicates strong processing capability that is unlikely to be saturated by this game’s logic at 1440p.
At 4K, the GPU’s dominance becomes absolute. The drop from 1440p Low to 4K Low is 21.0 FPS (from 99.9 to 78.9), which is a 21.0% reduction. At Medium settings, the drop from 1440p to 4K is 19.9% (from 60.4 to 48.4). These reductions are roughly proportional to the pixel count increase from 1440p to 4K, which is 2.25 times the pixels. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would not scale so directly with resolution. The data strongly indicates that the RTX 5060 is the primary determinant of performance at all tested settings, with the CPU providing sufficient support but never constraining the outcome.
The preset scaling also highlights the GPU’s role. For example, at 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra costs 73.7 FPS (from 113.9 to 40.2), a 64.7% reduction. At 4K, the same preset change costs 54.3 FPS (from 78.9 to 24.6), a 68.8% reduction. These large swings are characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the graphics card’s shading units, ray tracing cores, and memory bandwidth are saturated by the higher preset demands. The CPU’s performance, as measured by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1016 and multithread score of 7956, remains consistent regardless of resolution, but the frame rates do not, confirming that the GPU is the limiting factor.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run The Medium at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 70.9 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the highest preset that clears 60 FPS at this resolution, according to the verdict data.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?
A: The verdict data lists Low and Medium as playable at 2560x1440. The best settings option is Medium, with an average frame rate of 60.4 FPS. This is just barely above the 60 FPS threshold, so there is minimal headroom.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?
A: Yes, but only with Low settings. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average frame rate is 78.9 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra settings at 4K all fall below 60 FPS, with scores of 48.4, 36.7, and 24.6 FPS respectively.
Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at 1080p?
A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 delivers an average of 40.2 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS playable threshold, so it is not considered playable. The same preset at 1440p and 4K produces 35.6 and 24.6 FPS, respectively.
Q: Which component is more important for this game?
A: The data shows that the GPU is the primary factor. Frame rates scale significantly with resolution and preset changes, while the CPU’s benchmark scores remain constant. For instance, the difference between 1080p Low and 4K Low is 35.0 FPS, a 30.7% reduction, which is driven by the GPU’s workload.
Q: What is the lowest frame rate recorded in the dataset?
A: The lowest average frame rate is 24.6 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is the only configuration that falls below 30 FPS, indicating a very demanding combination.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearestRivals data provides context for how this CPU and GPU compare to other hardware in terms of average benchmark scores. For the Intel Core i5-12600KF, the closest rivals are the Intel Core i9-10900K, AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D. The i9-10900K has an average score of 27872, which is 0.3% lower than the i5-12600KF’s 27799. The Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712, a 0.3% difference in the opposite direction. The Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27887, again a 0.3% difference, and the Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, also a 0.3% difference. These deltas are negligible, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios, these processors would likely produce nearly identical frame rates. The i5-12600KF’s percentile rank of 79 places it alongside these competitors, so any of these CPUs could substitute without a meaningful change in The Medium’s performance, assuming the GPU remains constant.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 860M, NVIDIA GeForce MX550, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. The Radeon 860M has an average score of 26401, which is 0.3% higher than the RTX 5060’s 26331. The GeForce MX550 scores 26421, a 0.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, which is 0.8% higher, and the Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, which is 1.2% lower. These differences are all within 1.2%, indicating that these GPUs would perform within a few percentage points of each other in most games. In The Medium, the RTX 5060’s measured frame rates would likely be mirrored closely by the RX 6750 XT, with the RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary possibly being slightly faster. However, the exact game-specific performance is not provided in the fact pack, so this inference is based solely on the benchmark score deltas.
The combination of the i5-12600KF with any of these rival GPUs would likely produce similar results in The Medium, given the CPU’s minimal role in frame rate determination. Conversely, pairing the RTX 5060 with a rival CPU like the Ryzen 7 5800X3D would not change the outcome significantly, as the GPU remains the bottleneck. The data suggests that this system’s performance profile is robust to small hardware variations within these rival groups.
The Verdict
The verdict by resolution is clear: this PC can run The Medium, but only under specific conditions. At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, with an average frame rate of 78.9 FPS. This is the best settings option at 4K, and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by 18.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, both Low and Medium are playable, with Medium being the best settings option at 60.4 FPS. This is a marginal pass, as any minor fluctuation in scene complexity could push the frame rate below 60. At 1920x1080, Low and Medium are playable, with Medium providing 70.9 FPS. This offers more headroom than the 1440p Medium result, making 1080p the most comfortable playable resolution for this configuration.
The Ultra preset is not playable at any resolution, and High settings also fail to reach 60 FPS at all three resolutions. The highest playable preset at each resolution is Medium for 1080p and 1440p, and Low for 4K. Users seeking higher visual fidelity would need to accept sub-60 FPS performance, as the data shows no configuration with High settings clearing the threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i5-12600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1700 out of 3724 tested combos in The Medium. This places it in the 54th percentile of all tested systems (calculated as 1 - 1700/3724, which equals 54.3%). This is a middle-of-the-pack ranking, suggesting that while this combo is not among the top performers, it is also not a low-end configuration. The rank reflects the system’s ability to handle the game at lower presets, but its failure at High and Ultra presets likely drags it down relative to higher-tier GPUs and CPUs. The fact that the GPU’s percentile rank is 72 and the CPU’s is 79 indicates that both components are above average, but the game’s demanding nature means this combo cannot compete with systems that have more powerful GPUs, such as those with higher benchmark scores. The rank of 1700 out of 3724 is consistent with a mid-range setup that is playable only at reduced settings.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the measured FPS data and the verdict by resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is as follows:
- 1920x1080: Medium settings, with an average frame rate of 70.9 FPS. This is the highest playable preset, providing 10.9 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings offer 113.9 FPS, but Medium is the best balance of quality and performance.
- 2560x1440: Medium settings, with an average frame rate of 60.4 FPS. This is the highest playable preset, but the headroom is minimal at just 0.4 FPS. Low settings deliver 99.9 FPS, but Medium is the maximum that remains playable.
- 3840x2160: Low settings, with an average frame rate of 78.9 FPS. This is the only playable preset at 4K. Medium settings drop to 48.4 FPS, which is below the threshold. Low provides 18.9 FPS of headroom, making it the recommended choice for 4K.
These recommendations are derived directly from the verdictByResolution data, which lists the best settings as Medium for 1440p and 1080p, and Low for 4K. The average FPS at these settings matches the numbers above. Users should note that no preset at any resolution exceeds 60 FPS with High or Ultra settings, so those options are not viable for a smooth experience. The system’s performance is best utilized at Medium settings for 1080p and 1440p, and Low settings for 4K.