Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

The Medium
Horror 2021

The Medium

51%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
145 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
52 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
123 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
44 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
94 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
33 FPS
15.2ms Frame Time
23ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,470
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 29,366
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 41 60 94
1440p QHD 44 56 74 123
1080p Full HD 52 66 90 145

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 66
1920x1080 Low 145
1920x1080 Medium 90
1920x1080 Ultra 52
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 123
2560x1440 Medium 74
2560x1440 Ultra 44
3840x2160 High 41
3840x2160 Low 94
3840x2160 Medium 60
3840x2160 Ultra 33

Performance Analysis: The Medium on Your System

This analysis examines the measured performance of the Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in The Medium, based exclusively on the provided benchmark data. The combination is ranked 991st out of 3,724 tested configurations, placing it in the upper third of all tested combos. The data covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) across four quality presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra), with average FPS figures for each. The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, which serves as the reference point for all verdicts below.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the lowest tested resolution, the combination delivers its highest frame rates. The Low preset produces an average of 144.8 FPS, which is the single highest average across all tested configurations. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 90.2 FPS, still well above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset yields 66.3 FPS on average, which is the best playable setting at this resolution. The Ultra preset, however, falls below the threshold with an average of 52.4 FPS, indicating that even at 1080p, the most demanding preset cannot be sustained at a consistent 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance scaling is predictable but significant. The Low preset averages 123.1 FPS, which is a reduction of approximately 15% compared to the same preset at 1080p. The Medium preset achieves 74.3 FPS, remaining comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset drops to 55.7 FPS, which is just below the playable mark, while the Ultra preset falls further to 43.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at this resolution is roughly 49 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is about 19 FPS, showing that the performance cost of each preset tier is not uniform.

At 3840x2160, the highest tested resolution, the frame rates decline considerably. The Low preset averages 93.6 FPS, which is the only setting at this resolution that clears the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset averages 59.5 FPS, falling just 0.5 FPS short of the playable mark. The High preset averages 41.2 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 33.2 FPS, representing approximately a 64% reduction from the Low preset at the same resolution. The difference between Medium and High at 4K is 18.3 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is 8.0 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset carries a substantial but not overwhelming additional load.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this pairing, particularly at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the RTX 3080 is capable of producing 144.8 FPS on Low settings, which suggests that the Core i3-12100F is not severely limiting performance at this resolution when the graphical load is light. However, the scaling between Low and Medium at 1080p (a 54.6 FPS drop) is larger than the scaling between Medium and High (a 23.9 FPS drop), which indicates that the game becomes more GPU-bound as settings increase.

At 2560x1440, the pattern shifts. The Low preset averages 123.1 FPS, which is still very high, but the Medium preset drops to 74.3 FPS, a reduction of 48.8 FPS. This suggests that the GPU is handling the increased pixel count with relative ease, but the gap between Medium and High (18.6 FPS) is narrower than at 1080p, hinting that the CPU may begin to play a larger role in frame pacing as the resolution climbs. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 43.7 FPS, which is a 30.6 FPS drop from High, indicating that the GPU is now the clear limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant component. The Low preset averages 93.6 FPS, which is a 29.5 FPS drop from the 1440p Low preset, showing that the added pixel load directly impacts performance. The Medium preset at 4K averages 59.5 FPS, which is 14.8 FPS below the 1440p Medium preset. The High and Ultra presets at 4K (41.2 and 33.2 FPS respectively) show that the RTX 3080 is fully saturated at this resolution, and the CPU’s role is minimal. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings is a 21.7 FPS drop, while the scaling from 1440p to 4K at Low settings is a 29.5 FPS drop, demonstrating that the resolution increase has a compounding effect on GPU load.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, with a measured average of 66.3 FPS. This leaves a margin of 6.3 FPS above the threshold, which is relatively slim but still playable. The Medium preset at 90.2 FPS provides a more comfortable buffer, but High is the highest quality option that meets the criterion.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Medium, with an average of 74.3 FPS. This is 14.3 FPS above the threshold, offering a reasonable safety margin. The High preset at 55.7 FPS falls short of the 60 FPS requirement, so it is not recommended for a consistent experience. The Low preset at 123.1 FPS is also playable but sacrifices visual quality for a much higher frame rate.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves the 60 FPS target, with an average of 93.6 FPS. This is the sole playable option at this resolution, and it provides a substantial margin of 33.6 FPS above the threshold. The Medium preset at 59.5 FPS is technically below the threshold by just 0.5 FPS, which is marginal enough that it could be considered borderline, but the data clearly identifies Low as the best settings choice for 4K.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i3-12100F, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core 3 N355, which matches the i3-12100F with a delta of 0%. The Intel Core i5-9500 is 0.3% slower, while the Intel Core 5 120UL is 0.7% faster, and the Intel Core i7-1250U is 1.1% slower. These alternatives would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance in The Medium, meaning that any differences in frame rates would be negligible in practice.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, the nearest rivals are less obvious in terms of performance tier. The NVIDIA P106-100 has an average score that is 0.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 is also 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6600M is 0.4% higher, and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X is 0.4% higher. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the RTX 3080’s nearest performance peers are not actual desktop alternatives but rather a mix of professional and mobile parts that happen to score similarly in synthetic benchmarks. In practice, the RTX 3080 would outperform these rivals in gaming workloads, but the data does not support that claim directly.

When considering the combination as a whole, the CPU and GPU alternatives suggest that swapping the i3-12100F for any of its rivals would result in virtually identical frame rates, as the CPU is not the limiting factor in most tested scenarios. Similarly, replacing the RTX 3080 with one of its listed rivals would likely produce similar or slightly lower FPS, given the tiny score differences.

FAQ

*Q: Is the Intel Core i3-12100F a bottleneck for the RTX 3080 in The Medium?*

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo achieves 144.8 FPS, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at lower settings. However, at 3840x2160 Ultra, the average drops to 33.2 FPS, which is more consistent with GPU saturation than CPU limitation.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: The Medium preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS at 1440p, with an average of 74.3 FPS. The High preset falls to 55.7 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

*Q: Can this system run The Medium at 4K?*

A: Yes, but only on Low settings, which produce an average of 93.6 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K averages 59.5 FPS, just under the 60 FPS threshold, so it is not officially playable.

Q: How does the performance scale between 1080p and 4K on Low settings?

A: The average FPS drops from 144.8 at 1920x1080 to 123.1 at 2560x1440, and then to 93.6 at 3840x2160. This represents a 35.4% reduction from 1080p to 4K on the Low preset.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combination is ranked 991st out of 3,724 total tested combos, which places it in the top 27% of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at any resolution?

A: No. The Ultra preset averages 52.4 FPS at 1080p, 43.7 FPS at 1440p, and 33.2 FPS at 4K, all of which are below the 60 FPS threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i3-12100F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 991st out of 3,724 tested combos in The Medium. This places it in the 73rd percentile overall, meaning that roughly 27% of tested configurations perform better. The high rank is likely driven by the RTX 3080’s strong raw performance, as the CPU is a lower-tier part that would typically be paired with a less powerful GPU. The data shows that the combo is capable of delivering playable frame rates at all three tested resolutions, but only at specific settings presets. The rank reflects the system’s ability to handle the game’s demanding visuals, but it also highlights that the CPU is not the primary contributor to the overall performance score.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC can run The Medium at 1920x1080 with High settings, achieving an average of 66.3 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, with an average of 74.3 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, with an average of 93.6 FPS. The Ultra preset is not playable at any resolution, as the highest average it achieves is 52.4 FPS at 1080p. The system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can run at Medium to High settings with comfortable frame rates. At 4K, users must accept Low settings to maintain a consistent 60 FPS experience, which still provides a significant margin above the threshold. The combination is ranked 991st out of 3,724, indicating that it is a capable but not top-tier configuration for this title.