Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 66 | 79 | 117 |
| 1440p QHD | 85 | 112 | 133 | 198 |
| 1080p Full HD | 124 | 163 | 193 | 269 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers a dominant performance profile in Rust, based on measured data. Across all tested resolutions and presets, the system produces frame rates that consistently exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold, with the sole exception of 4K Ultra settings. The data indicates that this pairing is capable of handling Rust's demanding environments with high headroom, making it a top-tier option for players who prioritize smooth gameplay at high visual fidelity. The benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern where performance is heavily influenced by resolution, while the CPU and GPU combination provides enough raw power to maintain high averages even at 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for Rust reveals a comprehensive performance picture across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates exceptional capability, starting with an average of 269 FPS on Low settings. This drops to 193 FPS on Medium, with a minimum of 164 FPS and a maximum of 222 FPS, indicating that even the lowest frame rates remain far above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings produce an average of 163 FPS, while Ultra still maintains a robust 124 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a performance reduction of approximately 54%, yet every preset remains highly playable for competitive or high-refresh-rate gaming.
Moving to 2560x1440, the system continues to impress with an average of 198 FPS on Low settings. Medium settings deliver 133 FPS on average, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 153 FPS, showing that the RTX 4080 handles the increased pixel count with minimal strain. High settings yield 112 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 85 FPS, still comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold. The performance gap between 1080p and 1440p is notable but not drastic, with Ultra settings losing roughly 31% of the average FPS when moving up in resolution.
At 3840x2160, the demands of 4K resolution become more apparent, yet the system remains largely playable. Low settings produce an average of 117 FPS, while Medium delivers 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 90 FPS. High settings manage a 66 FPS average, just above the 60 FPS threshold, but Ultra settings fall below playability with a 50 FPS average. The data shows that 4K is the boundary for this combination, where only the most demanding preset fails to maintain a consistent 60 FPS experience. The min/max data available for Medium settings at each resolution suggests that frame pacing remains stable, with the 4K Medium preset showing a 23 FPS spread between minimum and maximum.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on 4K Ultra settings?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 50 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The system requires dropping to High settings at 4K to achieve a playable 66 FPS average.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 85 FPS, which is the highest quality preset that maintains playable performance. This setting comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold while delivering maximum visual fidelity.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 perform at 1080p with competitive settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 269 FPS, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. Even at Ultra settings, the 124 FPS average provides ample headroom for smooth gameplay.
Q: Is there a significant performance difference between Medium and High settings at 4K?
A: The data shows a 13 FPS difference between Medium (79 FPS average) and High (66 FPS average) at 3840x2160. Both presets remain playable, but High settings push the system closer to the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1440p Medium settings?
A: The measured results show an average of 133 FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 153 FPS. This preset offers a strong balance between visual quality and performance.
Q: Does the system maintain stable frame rates at 4K Medium settings?
A: Yes. The 3840x2160 Medium preset shows an average of 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 90 FPS. The 23 FPS spread indicates stable performance without major frame drops.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearestRivals data for both components, several hardware combinations would deliver comparable performance in Rust. The CPU benchmarks show that the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, with an average benchmark score of 48995, sits close to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, which scores 49196 and is only 0.4% faster. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228, representing a 0.5% advantage, while the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, which is 0.6% slower. The Intel Core i5-14600K scores 48618, making it 0.8% slower than the Ultra 5 245. These CPU alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust, as the game's performance is largely GPU-bound at most settings.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, making it extremely close to the RTX 4080 SUPER, which scores 54209 and is just 0.1% faster. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, representing a 1.1% advantage, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, which is 2.6% faster. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, making it 2.7% faster. These GPUs would produce very similar FPS numbers in Rust, with the differences being negligible for practical purposes. A system pairing any of these CPUs with the RTX 4080, or pairing the Ultra 5 245 with one of these rival GPUs, would yield performance within a few percentage points of the tested configuration.
The Verdict
The verdict for this PC running Rust is clear: it is a highly capable system that delivers playable performance across nearly all tested configurations. At 3840x2160, the playable settings include High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best settings preset that achieves a 66 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 4K falls below the 60 FPS threshold with a 50 FPS average, making it the only unplayable configuration in the dataset. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra delivering an 85 FPS average as the best settings option. At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable at all presets, with Ultra achieving a 124 FPS average. The data confirms that this combination can run Rust at 60 FPS or higher in every resolution except for 4K Ultra, making it an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and for high-quality 4K gaming with reduced settings.
How This Combo Ranks
In the global context of tested hardware combinations for Rust, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 183rd out of 3723 total combinations tested. This position places the system in the top 5% of all configurations, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of systems in this benchmark database. The rank reflects the strong synergy between the CPU and GPU, with the RTX 4080 providing substantial graphics horsepower and the Ultra 5 245 offering sufficient processing power to avoid bottlenecking in Rust's CPU-intensive scenarios. While the rank is not at the absolute top, it represents a very high-performing combination that would be difficult to beat without significantly more expensive hardware.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which produces an average of 66 FPS. This setting offers a good balance between visual quality and performance, though players seeking maximum fidelity would need to accept the 50 FPS average of Ultra settings. For 2560x1440, Ultra settings are the best choice, delivering an average of 85 FPS while providing the highest visual quality available. This preset offers significant headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for smooth gameplay even during intense scenes. For 1920x1080, Ultra settings achieve a 124 FPS average, making this the optimal configuration for players who want maximum visual quality with performance that far exceeds the playability threshold. The data indicates that at 1080p, the system has substantial performance reserves, with even the most demanding preset remaining well above the 60 FPS mark and suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.