Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 23 | 31 | 36 | 54 |
| 1440p QHD | 39 | 52 | 61 | 92 |
| 1080p Full HD | 57 | 75 | 89 | 133 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the Intel Arc B580 is a competent mid-range combination for Rust, but it has clear limits at higher resolutions. At 1080p, this combo delivers smooth gameplay across most presets, while 1440p remains viable with settings adjustments. At 4K, however, the system falls short of the 60 FPS threshold even on Low settings. The benchmark data shows a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and acceptable for 1440p, but not a 4K solution for this demanding survival title.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on High settings at 1920x1080?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1080p High is 75, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a solid margin. This is the best playable setting at this resolution according to the verdict data.
Q: What is the best playable settings preset at 2560x1440?
A: Medium is the best playable preset at 1440p, delivering an average of 61 FPS. Low also clears the threshold with 92 FPS average, but Medium offers the highest visual quality while still maintaining playable performance.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combination in Rust?
A: No. At 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves 60 FPS. The best result is on Low with an average of 54 FPS, which falls short of the playable threshold. Even Medium only reaches 36 FPS average.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080 in raw GPU benchmarks?
A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score is 23021, while the RTX 2080 scores 22895. This makes the B580 approximately 0.6% faster in aggregate GPU benchmarks, placing them in the same performance tier.
Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all tested processors?
A: The Core Ultra 5 245 sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs tested, indicating strong overall CPU performance. Its average benchmark score is 48995.
Q: Does the system hit 60 FPS in Rust at 1080p Ultra?
A: No. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS drops to 57, just below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data lists High as the best playable setting at this resolution, not Ultra.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the CPU and GPU divide responsibilities in Rust. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 133 FPS average on Low settings, but this drops to 89 FPS on Medium and 75 FPS on High. This 43% reduction from Low to High at the same resolution indicates that the Arc B580 is becoming the limiting factor as settings increase graphical load. The CPU has more headroom at 1080p, as evidenced by the high frame rates on Low settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop further: Low averages 92 FPS, Medium 61 FPS, and High 52 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p (a 34% reduction) is similar to the 1080p scaling pattern, but the absolute numbers are lower. This suggests that while both components are working harder at higher resolution, the GPU is taking on proportionally more of the workload. The jump from 1080p Low (133 FPS) to 1440p Low (92 FPS) represents a 31% performance decrease, which aligns with the increased pixel count demanding more from the GPU.
At 3840x2160, the picture becomes clearer. The Arc B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are pushed to their limits. Low settings average 54 FPS, Medium drops to 36 FPS, and High falls to 31 FPS. The scaling from 1440p Low (92 FPS) to 4K Low (54 FPS) is a 41% reduction, showing that the GPU is the dominant constraint at this resolution. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 14 threads, has sufficient compute headroom — the bottleneck shifts almost entirely to the GPU's shading units and memory subsystem as resolution increases.
The data indicates that at 1080p, the Core Ultra 5 245 and Arc B580 are relatively balanced, with neither component dramatically limiting the other. At 1440p, the GPU begins to assert itself as the primary constraint, particularly on higher presets. At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor, and no amount of CPU performance can compensate for the Arc B580's inability to sustain 60 FPS at this resolution in Rust.
How This Combo Ranks
The Core Ultra 5 245 and Arc B580 combination ranks 2815 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This ranking of roughly the 24th percentile might seem modest, but it reflects the demanding nature of Rust combined with the mid-range positioning of these components rather than any fundamental flaw in the pairing.
The CPU's 90th percentile ranking across all processors (average benchmark score 48995) shows that the Core Ultra 5 245 is a strong performer. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (score 49196, 0.4% faster), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (score 49228, 0.5% faster), and the Intel Core i5-14600K (score 48618, 0.8% slower). This places the CPU in good company, with performance nearly identical to several established mid-range and upper-mid-range processors.
The GPU tells a different story. The Arc B580's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs (average benchmark score 23021) is respectable but not exceptional. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (0.2% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (0.6% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (0.7% faster). The fact that the B580 trades blows with the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in aggregate benchmarks is notable, but Rust's specific workload apparently does not favor the Arc architecture as much as these synthetic benchmarks might suggest.
The combo ranking of 2815 out of 3723 indicates that while each component performs adequately on its own, the pairing does not achieve top-tier results in Rust specifically. This is likely due to the game's engine characteristics and how they interact with the Arc B580's driver and architecture. The CPU carries the load well, but the GPU's performance in Rust at higher resolutions drags the overall combo ranking down.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, the nearest performance rivals are all within 1% of its average benchmark score. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and AMD Ryzen 9 7900 are 0.4% and 0.5% faster respectively, while the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and Intel Core i5-14600K are 0.6% and 0.8% slower. Any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust, meaning the choice between them would come down to platform features and pricing rather than gaming performance.
On the GPU side, the Arc B580's nearest rivals present an interesting mix. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP is essentially identical (0.2% faster), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% slower and the RTX 3080 is 0.7% faster. The NVIDIA P106-100 is 1% faster in aggregate benchmarks. In practical terms, swapping the Arc B580 for any of these GPUs would yield similar frame rates in Rust, though driver-level differences in specific games could shift the balance. The RTX 3080's slightly higher score might translate to a few extra FPS in Rust, but the difference would be marginal based on the benchmark data.
A system with the Core Ultra 5 245 paired with any of these rival GPUs would behave nearly identically to the tested configuration. Likewise, keeping the Arc B580 and swapping the CPU to a Ryzen 9 7900 or Core i5-14600K would produce essentially the same Rust performance, as the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this game at the tested settings. The data suggests that users seeking similar performance could freely mix these components without expecting meaningful changes in Rust frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system performs well across most presets. Low settings deliver an average of 133 FPS, which is far above the playable threshold. Medium settings produce 89 FPS average with a minimum of 76 FPS and maximum of 103 FPS, showing consistent frame times. High settings average 75 FPS, still comfortably above 60. Ultra settings drop to 57 FPS average, narrowly missing the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, performance becomes more constrained. Low settings sustain 92 FPS average, which is playable. Medium settings average 61 FPS with a range of 52 to 71 FPS, meaning some scenes will dip below the 60 FPS threshold even though the average clears it. High settings average 52 FPS, which is not playable by the 60 FPS standard. Ultra settings fall to 39 FPS average.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Low settings average 54 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. Medium settings average 36 FPS with a range of 31 to 42 FPS. High settings average 31 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 23 FPS average. None of the 4K presets achieve playable performance, and the gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution (54 to 23 FPS) demonstrates the GPU's limitations under heavy load.
The frame time consistency at 1080p Medium (76 to 103 FPS range) suggests a stable experience, while the 1440p Medium range (52 to 71 FPS) indicates more variability that could cause noticeable stutters in demanding scenes. The 4K Medium range (31 to 42 FPS) shows even greater instability relative to its average, making this preset feel inconsistent during gameplay.
The Verdict
This PC can run Rust at 60 FPS, but only at specific resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system clears the threshold on High (75 FPS), Low (133 FPS), and Medium (89 FPS) presets. High is the best playable setting at this resolution, offering the highest visual quality among playable options. Ultra at 1080p falls just short at 57 FPS average, so users seeking maximum visual fidelity would need to accept slightly below 60 FPS or reduce other graphical options.
At 2560x1440, playable settings are limited to Low (92 FPS) and Medium (61 FPS). The verdict data identifies Medium as the best playable setting at this resolution, with an average of 61 FPS. However, the 52 FPS minimum at Medium means some scenes will drop below 60, so players sensitive to frame dips might prefer Low for a more consistent experience.
At 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves 60 FPS. The best result is Low at 54 FPS average, which is below the playable threshold. The verdict data lists no playable settings at 4K, confirming that this combination is not suitable for 4K gaming in Rust.
For the target audience of 1080p gamers, this system is a solid choice. The combination of the Core Ultra 5 245's strong CPU performance and the Arc B580's adequate GPU power delivers smooth gameplay on High settings at 1080p. For 1440p users, the system is workable with Medium settings, though the frame time variability warrants consideration. For 4K enthusiasts, this combination is not adequate for Rust, and a more powerful GPU would be necessary to achieve playable frame rates at that resolution.