Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

99%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
258 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
124 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
198 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
85 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
50 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 36,938
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 50 66 79 117
1440p QHD 85 112 133 198
1080p Full HD 124 163 193 258

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 163
1920x1080 Low 258
1920x1080 Medium 193
1920x1080 Ultra 124
2560x1440 High 112
2560x1440 Low 198
2560x1440 Medium 133
2560x1440 Ultra 85
3840x2160 High 66
3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 79
3840x2160 Ultra 50

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is a strong combination for Rust, and the measured data confirms it. Across all three tested resolutions — 1080p, 1440p, and 4K — this pairing clears the 60 FPS playable threshold in multiple presets, with the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 34457 and the CPU's single-thread result of 4412 providing plenty of headroom for a survival title that originally launched in 2018. The data shows a PC that ranks well above the middle of the pack and handles Rust at settings most players actually want to use.

How This Combo Ranks

Out of 3723 tested hardware combinations in Rust, this pairing ranks 203rd. That places it comfortably in the top tier — roughly the top five percent of all combos benchmarked for this game. Rust is a game where CPU single-thread performance matters a great deal, because large server populations, base building, and player-versus-player combat all lean on fast per-core throughput rather than raw core count. The Core Ultra 5 225 sits in the 85th percentile versus all CPUs, and its rivals list tells an interesting story: the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F posts an average score of 36945 against the Ultra 5 225's 36938 — a delta of essentially zero — while the Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018), Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093), and Core i9-12900T (37112) all sit within half a percent.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 lands in the 86th percentile versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54247. Its nearest rival is telling: the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, just 0.1 percent behind. In practice that means the two cards are interchangeable for Rust. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (-1.1 percent), Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (-2.6 percent), and Radeon 8060S (-2.7 percent) also cluster nearby.

The takeaway from the ranking: this is not a borderline configuration hoping to scrape past 60 FPS. It is a high-percentile pairing on both the CPU and GPU sides, and its rank of 203 out of 3723 in Rust reflects that.

CPU and GPU Roles

Which component limits Rust performance here? The scaling data between resolutions answers that clearly. At 1080p Medium, the combo averages 193 FPS. Move to 1440p Medium and the average drops to 133 FPS — a fall of roughly 31 percent. At 4K Medium it drops again to 79 FPS. That is a steep, resolution-driven decline, and it indicates the RTX 4080 is doing the heavy lifting: the frame rate responds directly to GPU load, which means the graphics card — not the processor — is the limiting factor at Medium and above.

The preset scaling within each resolution reinforces this. At 1080p, going from Low (258 FPS) to Ultra (124 FPS) costs more than half the frame rate. At 4K, Low delivers 117 FPS while Ultra falls to 50 FPS. When a GPU's workload is the variable producing those swings, the card is the bottleneck.

Where does the Core Ultra 5 225 matter? Look at the Low preset numbers. At 1080p Low the combo reaches 258 FPS — territory where the CPU typically becomes the ceiling, since the GPU is barely being stressed. The Ultra 5 225's PassMark single-thread score of 4412 and Cinebench R23 single-core result of 3655 show a processor with strong per-core throughput, which is exactly what Rust rewards. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 across 10 cores and 10 threads is modest compared to higher-tier chips, but Rust does not need deep multi-core throughput — it needs fast individual cores, and this CPU delivers that with a 4.90 GHz boost clock.

Practical reading: at 1080p and 1440p with lower presets, the CPU sets the ceiling; at 1440p High and everything at 4K, the RTX 4080 takes over. Neither component is a weak link for this specific game.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K?

A: Yes, at three of four presets. At 3840x2160 the combo averages 117 FPS on Low, 79 FPS on Medium, and 66 FPS on High — all above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra at 4K averages 50 FPS, which falls short.

Q: What is the fastest frame rate this combo achieves in Rust?

A: 258 FPS average at 1920x1080 on the Low preset. At the same resolution, Medium averages 193 FPS with a range of 164 to 222 FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 still a current product?

A: No. The FACT PACK lists its production status as End-of-life. It was released in 2022, sits on the AD103 chip with the Ada Lovelace architecture, and has been succeeded by the GeForce 50 series. Performance-wise, though, it remains in the 86th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 36938 is statistically identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945, delta 0 percent) and within half a percent of the Ryzen 5 5500X3D, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, and Intel Core i9-12900T.

Q: Does Rust favor the CPU or the GPU in this build?

A: The GPU at higher settings and resolutions. Frame rates scale steeply with resolution — 193 FPS at 1080p Medium versus 79 FPS at 4K Medium — showing the RTX 4080 as the limiting factor once the workload grows. The CPU's strong single-thread performance sets the ceiling at Low settings.

Q: What memory does this platform support?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225 supports DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, using Intel Socket 1851. The GPU carries 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth.

Similar Performance Alternatives

If you are building around this performance level, the rival data points to several swaps that would behave almost identically in Rust.

On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is the closest substitute — its average score differs by zero percent, making it functionally equivalent in the benchmark database. The Ryzen 5 5500X3D trails by 0.2 percent, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 by 0.4 percent, and Intel's own Core i9-12900T by 0.5 percent. Any of these processors would produce Rust results within a fraction of the Ultra 5 225's numbers. Note that the i9-12900T achieves this despite being a low-power part from an older generation — the deltas here are small enough that platform features, not Rust performance, would drive the choice between them.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the obvious alternative at 0.1 percent behind — effectively the same card for this game. AMD options cluster slightly further back: the Radeon Pro W5700X at -1.1 percent, the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at -2.6 percent, and the Radeon 8060S at -2.7 percent. Those deltas are small enough that Rust frame rates would shift by only a few FPS at most settings. Given that the RTX 4080's Ultra 4K result is 50 FPS — already below the threshold — a GPU even two to three percent slower would not change the verdict at any resolution.

The practical guidance: if you find any of these rival parts cheaper or more available, the Rust experience will be near-indistinguishable from this reference combo.

Best Settings per Resolution

The target is the most demanding preset that holds at or above 60 FPS. The measured data gives a clean answer at every resolution.

At 1920x1080, the answer is Ultra at 124 FPS average — more than double the threshold. Medium runs at 193 FPS (164 to 222 FPS range) and Low at 258 FPS if competitive frame rates matter more than visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, Ultra again clears the bar at 85 FPS average. High delivers 112 FPS, Medium 133 FPS (113 to 153 range), and Low 198 FPS. Every preset at 1440p is playable.

At 3840x2160, High is the ceiling at 66 FPS average. That is a slim margin over 60 — only six frames — so players sensitive to dips may prefer Medium at 79 FPS, which carries a measured minimum of 67 FPS. Low at 4K averages 117 FPS. Ultra at 4K averages 50 FPS and is the only tested configuration that misses the threshold.

The Verdict

Yes — this PC runs Rust well. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous:

  • 1920x1080: Playable on all four presets, best at Ultra with 124 FPS average.
  • 2560x1440: Playable on all four presets, best at Ultra with 85 FPS average.
  • 3840x2160: Playable on High, Medium, and Low, best at High with 66 FPS average. Ultra at 50 FPS misses the mark.

In plain terms, a 1080p or 1440p monitor lets you max the game out completely, and even a 4K display supports High settings with room to spare on Medium. The combo's rank of 203 out of 3723 tested configurations backs that up. The RTX 4080 may be end-of-life as a product, but with a PassMark G3D score of 34457 and 16 GB of GDDR6X, it treats Rust — a survival game from 2018 — as a light workload at anything below 4K Ultra. The Core Ultra 5 225, with its 4.90 GHz boost and strong single-thread results, keeps pace at every setting. For Rust specifically, there is no scenario in this dataset where this pairing fails to deliver a playable experience except one: 4K Ultra, and even that lands at 50 FPS, within reach of the threshold with a one-step preset reduction.