Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
275 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
150 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
239 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
103 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
5.1ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 79,097
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 77,712

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 80 95 141
1440p QHD 103 136 161 239
1080p Full HD 150 197 233 275

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 197
1920x1080 Low 275
1920x1080 Medium 233
1920x1080 Ultra 150
2560x1440 High 136
2560x1440 Low 239
2560x1440 Medium 161
2560x1440 Ultra 103
3840x2160 High 80
3840x2160 Low 141
3840x2160 Medium 95
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D form a top-tier combination for Rust, with benchmark data showing the pairing ranks 11th out of 3,723 tested combos. The measured frame rates indicate this system delivers playable performance at every preset across all three tested resolutions, with the most demanding Ultra preset still clearing the 60 FPS threshold even at 4K. The data reveals a system that is heavily GPU-bound at lower resolutions but maintains exceptional headroom throughout, making it a reference-class setup for this survival title.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest playable settings preset at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 61 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This makes Ultra the most demanding playable setting at 4K, with High (80 FPS), Medium (95 FPS), and Low (141 FPS) also exceeding the threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79,097, placing it 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-14900KF (79,371), 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (79,574), and 1.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7413 (80,041). It outperforms the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (77,740) by 1.7%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile compared to all tested GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D sits in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 77,712 places it 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (76,904) and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78,940).

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the system records a minimum of 136 FPS and a maximum of 185 FPS, with an average of 161 FPS. This shows strong frame pacing consistency with a 49 FPS spread between minimum and maximum.

Q: How many CPU cores and threads does the i9-14900K offer?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K features 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz, a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, and a 125 W TDP.

Q: What memory specifications does the RTX 5090 D utilize?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D comes with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data for Rust reveals a clear shift in workload balance between the CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 275 FPS on Low settings, 233 FPS on Medium, and 197 FPS on High — these extremely high frame rates suggest the CPU is feeding frames faster than the GPU can render at lower graphical loads. The i9-14900K's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with its 6.00 GHz boost clock, provide ample processing power for Rust's simulation and world-generation tasks, which are known to be CPU-intensive in survival games.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale downward: Low drops to 239 FPS, Medium to 161 FPS, and High to 136 FPS. The reduction from 1080p to 1440p is modest in percentage terms for Low settings (275 to 239, roughly 13% decline), but more pronounced for Medium (233 to 161, roughly 31% decline). This pattern indicates the GPU begins to take on a larger share of the workload as pixel count increases, though the CPU still maintains a strong influence at these mid-range resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck. Low settings yield 141 FPS, Medium produces 95 FPS, and High drops to 80 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a significant performance hit across all presets — Low falls from 239 to 141 FPS (41% reduction), and Medium from 161 to 95 FPS (41% reduction). This consistent percentage drop across resolutions suggests the RTX 5090 D's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are being fully utilized at 4K, with the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute becoming the limiting factor.

The Ultra preset tells a similar story: 150 FPS at 1080p, 103 FPS at 1440p, and 61 FPS at 4K. The nearly linear scaling between resolutions for Ultra settings indicates the GPU is the primary constraint at higher quality levels. The CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases, but even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains 61 FPS, suggesting the i9-14900K never becomes a severe bottleneck — the data points to a balanced pairing where the GPU limits at 4K and the CPU allows extremely high frame rates at 1080p.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 150 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that stays well above the 60 FPS threshold. The system has enormous headroom at this resolution — even the most graphically intensive preset nearly triples the playable threshold, and Low settings reach 275 FPS, which approaches the refresh rate limits of most high-end monitors.

For 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best choice with an average of 103 FPS. This clears 60 FPS by a 72% margin, providing smooth gameplay with room for frame drops during intense moments. The Medium preset at 161 FPS offers additional headroom for competitive play, but the data shows Ultra is comfortably playable without sacrificing visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves 61 FPS, just barely clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding configuration that remains playable, though it leaves minimal margin for fluctuation. For users who prioritize stability over maximum visuals, High settings at 80 FPS offer a more comfortable buffer, and Medium at 95 FPS provides even greater consistency with minimum and maximum values of 81 and 109 FPS respectively.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i9-14900K's nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which scores 79,371 in average benchmarks — a mere 0.3% difference. This makes the KF variant essentially identical in CPU-bound scenarios, as both share the same architecture and core configuration. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus sits 0.6% higher at 79,574, while the AMD EPYC 7413 leads this group at 80,041, though its server-oriented design may not translate directly to gaming performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 trails by 1.7% with a score of 77,740, representing the closest non-Intel alternative.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5090 D's nearest rivals present an interesting comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940, just 1.6% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT comes in 1.1% lower at 76,904. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 variants (PCIe 12 GB and 16 GB) score 79,396 and 79,605 respectively, showing 2.1% and 2.4% advantages — though these data-center cards lack the gaming-specific optimizations of the GeForce lineup. In practical terms, a system pairing the i9-14900K with one of these near-equivalent GPUs would likely produce similar Rust frame rates, with the RX 6850M XT perhaps edging slightly ahead in GPU-bound scenarios.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Rust, with measured data confirming playable performance at every resolution and preset combination tested. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS by a massive margin — Ultra averages 150 FPS, and even the most demanding setting provides 2.5x the playable threshold. The 2560x1440 results are equally decisive, with Ultra at 103 FPS and Medium at 161 FPS, both offering substantial headroom above the 60 FPS requirement.

The only borderline scenario appears at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, where the system averages 61 FPS. This clears the threshold but with only 1 FPS of margin, meaning transient spikes in on-screen action could potentially dip below playable rates. However, the High preset at 80 FPS and Medium at 95 FPS provide more comfortable 4K options, and Low settings reach 141 FPS for users prioritizing maximum smoothness. The verdict is unambiguous: this combination delivers playable frame rates across the board, with the only caveat being a narrow buffer at 4K Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 3,723 tested CPU and GPU combinations for Rust, this pairing holds the 11th position. This top-tier ranking reflects the exceptional synergy between the i9-14900K's high single-thread performance (2,262.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and the RTX 5090 D's massive compute resources (104.8 TFLOPS FP32). The rank places this system in the top 0.3% of tested configurations, indicating that only a handful of more powerful pairings exist — primarily those featuring the RTX 5090 D's successor or higher-clocked variants of similar hardware.

The ranking is particularly notable given that the GPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, not the absolute top. This suggests the CPU's contribution is significant in Rust's CPU-heavy gameplay, where the i9-14900K's 36 MB of L3 cache and 6.00 GHz boost clock help maintain high minimum frame rates during complex world interactions. The combination's rank demonstrates that balanced high-end hardware outperforms a lopsided pairing, even when one component is near the top of its class.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080:

  • Low: 275 FPS average
  • Medium: 233 FPS average, 198 FPS minimum, 268 FPS maximum
  • High: 197 FPS average
  • Ultra: 150 FPS average

2560x1440:

  • Low: 239 FPS average
  • Medium: 161 FPS average, 136 FPS minimum, 185 FPS maximum
  • High: 136 FPS average
  • Ultra: 103 FPS average

3840x2160:

  • Low: 141 FPS average
  • Medium: 95 FPS average, 81 FPS minimum, 109 FPS maximum
  • High: 80 FPS average
  • Ultra: 61 FPS average

The data shows a consistent scaling pattern: each resolution step from 1080p to 1440p to 4K reduces average FPS by roughly 40-45% for equivalent settings. The Medium preset's minimum and maximum values at each resolution demonstrate frame pacing consistency, with the 4K Medium spread (81-109 FPS) being the tightest of any resolution, suggesting the GPU maintains stable performance under load. The Low preset at 1080p reaches 275 FPS, indicating the CPU's processing capacity is the limiting factor at this resolution, as the GPU could likely render more frames if the CPU could supply them faster.