Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
275 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
137 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
222 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
92 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
129 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
56 FPS
5.6ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 79,097
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 56 75 90 129
1440p QHD 92 126 146 222
1080p Full HD 137 179 212 275

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 179
1920x1080 Low 275
1920x1080 Medium 212
1920x1080 Ultra 137
2560x1440 High 126
2560x1440 Low 222
2560x1440 Medium 146
2560x1440 Ultra 92
3840x2160 High 75
3840x2160 Low 129
3840x2160 Medium 90
3840x2160 Ultra 56

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers exceptional performance in Rust, with measured frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across all tested resolutions and presets. The data shows a system that is heavily overqualified for this title, but the specific margins of headroom vary significantly depending on the resolution and graphical settings chosen. At 3840x2160, the combo averages 75 FPS on High settings, 89.6 FPS on Medium, and 128.6 FPS on Low, while the Ultra preset dips to an average of 56.2 FPS, narrowly missing the playable mark. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates rise substantially: 126 FPS on High, 146 FPS on Medium, 221.8 FPS on Low, and 92.4 FPS on Ultra. At 1920x1080, the performance is even more impressive, with the Ultra preset averaging 136.7 FPS, High at 178.9 FPS, Medium at 212.1 FPS, and Low at 275.2 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a clear pattern of performance scaling across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160, the system produces an average of 128.6 FPS on Low settings, which represents the highest frame rate at this resolution. The Medium preset delivers 89.6 FPS, while High settings yield 75 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration in the entire dataset that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 56.2 FPS. This indicates that while the RTX 4090 is powerful enough for most 4K scenarios, Rust's Ultra preset at this resolution imposes a substantial load that even this flagship GPU cannot fully overcome.

At 2560x1440, the performance headroom expands considerably. Low settings produce an average of 221.8 FPS, which is nearly four times the playability threshold. Medium settings average 146 FPS, and High settings average 126 FPS. The Ultra preset, which struggled at 4K, achieves a comfortable 92.4 FPS average at this resolution. The scaling from 4K to 1440p shows an approximate 65% improvement in frame rate for the Ultra preset (from 56.2 to 92.4 FPS), while the Low preset improves by roughly 72% (from 128.6 to 221.8 FPS).

The 1920x1080 results demonstrate that this combination is essentially unconstrained at lower resolutions. The Low preset averages 275.2 FPS, Medium averages 212.1 FPS, High averages 178.9 FPS, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 136.7 FPS. The difference between 1440p and 1080p is notable but smaller than the jump from 4K to 1440p: the Ultra preset improves by about 48% (from 92.4 to 136.7 FPS), while the Low preset improves by about 24% (from 221.8 to 275.2 FPS). This diminishing scaling suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU begins to play a more significant role in limiting frame rates, as the GPU has ample headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 63rd out of 3,723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the top 1.7% of all configurations. This percentile position reflects the raw power of both components: the Core i9-14900K sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs in general benchmark scores, while the RTX 4090 holds the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a near-flagship GPU results in a system that outperforms the vast majority of tested hardware in this game.

The ranking indicates that while there are 62 other combinations that achieve higher average frame rates in Rust, they are likely using even more specialized or newer hardware. The data shows that this combo's performance is sufficient to run the game at maximum settings at 1080p and 1440p, and at High settings at 4K, which covers the most common gaming scenarios. The rank of 63 out of 3,723 also suggests that the performance ceiling for Rust is not far above what this system achieves, as the top 62 combos represent only a marginal improvement in practical terms.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 56.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 75 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting to use at 2560x1440?

A: The Ultra preset is fully playable at 1440p, averaging 92.4 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, and it provides the best visual quality while maintaining smooth performance.

Q: How much faster is this combo at 1080p compared to 4K?

A: At 1080p with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 136.7, which is 143% higher than the 56.2 FPS at 4K Ultra. At Low settings, the difference is smaller: 275.2 FPS at 1080p versus 128.6 FPS at 4K, a 114% improvement.

Q: Does the RTX 4090's benchmark score reflect its gaming performance in Rust?

A: The RTX 4090 has a Passmark G3D score of 38,194 and an average benchmark score of 60,347, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. In Rust, the measured FPS data shows strong performance, but the 4K Ultra result of 56.2 FPS indicates that even this GPU has limits with the most demanding settings.

Q: Is the Core i9-14900K a bottleneck for the RTX 4090 in Rust?

A: The CPU's benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,399.5 and a single-core score of 2,262.5, indicate it has ample processing power. At 1080p, where GPU load is lower, the frame rates still exceed 136 FPS on Ultra, suggesting the CPU is not a significant bottleneck at any resolution.

Q: What are the playable settings at 3840x2160?

A: According to the verdict data, Low, Medium, and High settings are all playable at 4K, with average FPS of 128.6, 89.6, and 75 respectively. The Ultra preset is the only one that falls below 60 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i9-14900K, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core i9-14900KF with a score of 79,371 (0.3% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus with 79,574 (0.6% lower), the AMD EPYC 7413 with 80,041 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with 77,740 (1.7% higher). These CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Rust, as the deltaPct values are all within 2% of the i9-14900K's average score of 79,097. The i9-14900KF is the closest match, differing by only 0.3%, which would result in frame rates that are effectively indistinguishable in gameplay.

For the GPU, the RTX 4090's nearest rivals are the Intel Arc Pro A60 with an average score of 60,326 (0% difference), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 with 60,140 (0.3% difference), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with 61,896 (2.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 with 58,657 (2.9% lower). These GPUs are benchmarked as near-equivalents to the RTX 4090, though the Arc Pro A60 and Radeon Pro Vega 48 are workstation-oriented parts that may not have the same gaming optimizations. In practice, a system using the i9-14900KF instead of the i9-14900K would produce nearly identical FPS in Rust, while swapping the RTX 4090 for a Radeon PRO V710 would likely result in a small but measurable decrease in frame rates, on the order of 2-3%.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, which achieves an average of 75 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that maintains a frame rate above the 60 FPS threshold. While Medium and Low also remain playable at 89.6 and 128.6 FPS respectively, High offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. Ultra at 4K should be avoided, as it averages only 56.2 FPS.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, averaging 92.4 FPS. This provides the highest visual fidelity while still delivering smooth gameplay. The High preset at 126 FPS and Medium at 146 FPS offer higher frame rates for competitive play, but they do not provide the same visual quality as Ultra.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is again the best setting, with an average of 136.7 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the full visual experience. The lower presets all offer even higher frame rates, with Low reaching 275.2 FPS, which would be beneficial for players using high-refresh-rate monitors or seeking the absolute lowest input latency.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Rust, and it does so with substantial headroom at most settings. The verdict data confirms that at 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, and Ultra) are playable, with the Ultra preset averaging 136.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same is true: all presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 92.4 FPS. At 3840x2160, three of the four presets are playable (Low at 128.6 FPS, Medium at 89.6 FPS, and High at 75 FPS), but Ultra falls to 56.2 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

The system's ability to handle Ultra settings at 1440p and 1080p, while requiring a drop to High at 4K, demonstrates that it is well-suited for Rust in virtually all gaming scenarios. The only limitation is the 4K Ultra preset, which represents the most demanding configuration possible for this title. For players who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, even the 4K Low preset provides a highly responsive 128.6 FPS average.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals an interesting dynamic between CPU and GPU load across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as evidenced by the Ultra preset dropping to 56.2 FPS while the CPU remains capable of much higher performance. The scaling from 4K to 1440p shows a dramatic improvement in frame rates across all settings, indicating that the GPU has significant headroom at lower resolutions. For example, the Ultra preset improves from 56.2 FPS at 4K to 92.4 FPS at 1440p, a 64% increase, which is primarily due to the reduced pixel count.

At 1920x1080, the scaling becomes less pronounced, suggesting that the CPU begins to play a larger role. The Ultra preset improves from 92.4 FPS at 1440p to 136.7 FPS at 1080p, a 48% increase, while the Low preset improves from 221.8 to 275.2 FPS, only a 24% increase. This diminishing return indicates that at 1080p, the Core i9-14900K's processing power is becoming a more significant factor, as the RTX 4090 has more than enough capacity to render the frame at lower resolutions.

The Core i9-14900K's benchmark scores support its role as a capable partner: it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,399.5 and a single-core score of 2,262.5, alongside a Geekbench single-core score of 2,655. These results place it at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, ensuring that it can keep pace with the RTX 4090's output at any resolution. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, with a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, provide ample processing power for Rust's simulation and world-generation tasks. For players using 1080p or 1440p displays, the GPU will be the primary driver of performance, while at 4K, the GPU's raw throughput becomes the deciding factor.