Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
216 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
93 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
64 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
88 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
38 FPS
8.2ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 79,097
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 50 59 88
1440p QHD 64 84 100 148
1080p Full HD 93 122 145 216

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 122
1920x1080 Low 216
1920x1080 Medium 145
1920x1080 Ultra 93
2560x1440 High 84
2560x1440 Low 148
2560x1440 Medium 100
2560x1440 Ultra 64
3840x2160 High 50
3840x2160 Low 88
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 38

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a wide range of performance in Rust, scaling from a demanding 4K experience to a high-refresh-rate 1080p powerhouse. The measured data indicates that this combination is highly capable, but the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and whether the user prioritizes visual fidelity or maximum frame rates.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold is identified as the best setting.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding playable preset is Low, which achieves an average of 88 FPS. While the Medium preset reaches an average of 59 FPS, it falls just below the 60 FPS threshold, making Low the highest quality setting that comfortably clears the playability bar. The High preset drops to 50 FPS and Ultra to 38 FPS, both of which are not considered playable at this resolution.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the data shows that all presets are playable. The most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 64 FPS. This allows users to run the game at maximum visual settings while still maintaining a playable frame rate, albeit with less headroom than lower presets.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combination is exceptionally strong. The Ultra preset is the most demanding playable option, achieving a high average of 93 FPS. This confirms that the hardware is more than sufficient for a fully maxed-out experience at the most common resolution, leaving significant performance headroom for high refresh rate monitors.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU in Rust.

The data shows that as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, the average FPS drops significantly across all presets. For example, the Low preset drops from 216 FPS at 1080p to 148 FPS at 1440p and further to 88 FPS at 4K. This steep decline indicates that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the pixel fill rate and shading demands increase substantially. The RTX 3080's performance is the limiting factor for achieving high frame rates at 4K.

Conversely, the impact of the CPU is most evident when looking at the scaling between presets at a fixed resolution. At 1080p, the difference between the Low preset (216 FPS) and the Ultra preset (93 FPS) is 123 FPS. This wide gap is driven by the increased CPU workload from higher settings, such as draw distance and physics calculations. The Core i9-14900K, with its high single-thread performance, enables very high frame rates at lower presets, but the game's engine still scales its CPU demands with quality settings.

At 1440p, the pattern is similar, with the Low preset hitting 148 FPS and the Ultra preset at 64 FPS. The CPU is still capable of feeding the GPU at these settings, but the GPU's workload is increasing. At 4K, the GPU is heavily saturated, and the CPU's role diminishes in relative terms; the frame rate is more tightly coupled to the GPU's rendering capabilities, as seen by the smaller absolute differences between presets (e.g., 88 FPS on Low vs. 50 FPS on High). The data suggests that the i9-14900K provides ample headroom for the RTX 3080, and the GPU is the dominant factor in determining playability at 4K, while the CPU's performance ceiling is more relevant at 1080p and 1440p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact measured average, minimum, and maximum FPS for each resolution and settings combination.

At 1920x1080:

  • Low: Average 216 FPS, no min/max data provided.
  • Medium: Average 145 FPS, with a minimum of 123 FPS and a maximum of 166 FPS.
  • High: Average 122 FPS, no min/max data provided.
  • Ultra: Average 93 FPS, no min/max data provided.

At 2560x1440:

  • Low: Average 148 FPS, no min/max data provided.
  • Medium: Average 100 FPS, with a minimum of 85 FPS and a maximum of 115 FPS.
  • High: Average 84 FPS, no min/max data provided.
  • Ultra: Average 64 FPS, no min/max data provided.

At 3840x2160:

  • Low: Average 88 FPS, no min/max data provided.
  • Medium: Average 59 FPS, with a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 68 FPS.
  • High: Average 50 FPS, no min/max data provided.
  • Ultra: Average 38 FPS, no min/max data provided.

The data shows a consistent and predictable scaling pattern. The Medium preset is the only one with complete min/max data across all resolutions, showing a tighter frame time distribution at 1080p (123-166 FPS) compared to 4K (50-68 FPS). This indicates that frame pacing is more consistent at lower resolutions, where the system has more headroom.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the Intel Core i9-14900K, the nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score include the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which scores 0.3% lower. Other close alternatives are the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (0.6% lower), the AMD EPYC 7413 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, which scores 1.7% higher. These CPUs would likely provide a very similar gameplay experience in Rust, as the processing demands of the game are well within the capabilities of all these high-end parts.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, the nearest rivals are surprisingly close in average benchmark score. The NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 both score 0.3% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600M and AMD Radeon R9 M290X score 0.4% lower. These GPUs are listed as having nearly identical average scores, which suggests that in synthetic benchmarks, they perform similarly. However, the architectural differences and driver optimizations could lead to different real-world results in Rust, but based on the provided data, they are the closest performance equivalents.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only at the Low preset, which achieves an average of 88 FPS. The Medium preset falls just short of the 60 FPS playable threshold with an average of 59 FPS.

Q: What is the highest settings preset that is playable at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset is playable at 2560x1440, with an average frame rate of 64 FPS. All other presets (Low, Medium, High) also exceed the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck for this game?

A: The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions like 4K, where frame rates drop significantly. At 1080p, the CPU's performance allows for very high frame rates, but the game still scales with the CPU workload as settings increase.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 3080's nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, have average benchmark scores that are only 0.3% and 0.3% lower, respectively. This indicates very close synthetic performance.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system achieves an average of 122 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and provides a smooth experience.

Q: Is the Core i9-14900K significantly faster than its closest rival?

A: The Core i9-14900K's closest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF, has an average benchmark score that is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% higher, but the differences are minimal and unlikely to cause a noticeable difference in Rust.

The Verdict

The benchmark data confirms that this PC can run Rust effectively, but the playable experience is highly dependent on the chosen resolution. At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which achieves an average of 88 FPS. This allows for a playable 4K experience, but users must compromise on visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the system is fully capable. The verdict lists all four presets (High, Low, Medium, Ultra) as playable, with the Ultra preset maintaining an average of 64 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this combination, offering both high visual fidelity and a comfortable frame rate.

At 1920x1080, the hardware excels. All presets are playable, and the Ultra preset achieves an average of 93 FPS. This makes the combination ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, with significant headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. In summary, this is a strong performer for Rust, offering a playable experience at 4K, a fully maxed-out experience at 1440p, and excellent performance at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested hardware combinations in the benchmark database, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 holds a rank of 998 out of 3723 total combos. This places the system in the top quarter of all tested configurations, indicating it is a high-performing setup for Rust. The rank reflects the balance between the powerful CPU and the capable GPU, with the primary limitation being the GPU's performance at 4K resolution. The high CPU percentile of 95 and GPU percentile of 68 illustrate that while the processor is near the top of its class, the graphics card is a mid-to-high range performer, which is reflected in the overall combo ranking.