Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 68 | 82 | 125 |
| 1440p QHD | 91 | 122 | 142 | 208 |
| 1080p Full HD | 130 | 174 | 203 | 263 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers a strong performance profile in Rust, with measured data showing playable frame rates across all tested resolutions. Benchmark results indicate that this combination handles the survival title with significant headroom, though the most demanding preset at 4K requires a slight reduction in settings to maintain the 60 FPS threshold.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, producing an average of 67.9 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short of the playable threshold at 55.3 FPS, while Medium and Low settings provide 82.2 FPS and 124.8 FPS respectively, but High offers the best visual quality while clearing the 60 FPS bar.
Moving to 2560x1440, the Ultra preset becomes viable with an average of 90.7 FPS. This resolution allows full graphical fidelity without compromise, as even the most demanding settings maintain a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. High settings reach 121.5 FPS, Medium hits 142.1 FPS, and Low achieves 207.6 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 130.4 FPS, making it the recommended choice for maximum visual quality. The performance headroom is substantial at this resolution, with High settings at 173.7 FPS, Medium at 202.6 FPS, and Low reaching 263.3 FPS. The data shows that 1080p Ultra is not only playable but leaves significant performance in reserve for demanding scenes or background tasks.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how the CPU and GPU divide responsibilities in Rust. The frame rate differences between presets at each resolution indicate that graphical settings have a strong impact on performance, but the pattern across resolutions shows GPU-bound behavior at higher settings.
At 3840x2160, dropping from Ultra to Low increases frame rates from 55.3 FPS to 124.8 FPS, a 2.26x improvement. This substantial scaling suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, as reducing graphical load directly translates to higher throughput. The RTX 5080’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth provide the capacity needed for 4K textures, but raw rasterization limits Ultra settings.
At 2560x1440, the same preset range shows frame rates from 90.7 FPS at Ultra to 207.6 FPS at Low. The scaling factor here is 2.29x, similar to 4K, indicating the GPU still dominates performance at this resolution. However, the absolute numbers are significantly higher, suggesting that the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU effectively at 1440p.
The 1920x1080 results show a different dynamic. Ultra settings produce 130.4 FPS, while Low reaches 263.3 FPS, a 2.02x scaling factor. The slightly reduced scaling suggests that at 1080p, the CPU begins to play a more significant role, particularly at lower settings where the GPU can process frames faster than the i7-14700KF can supply them. The processor’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample compute resources, with multi-threaded benchmarks like Cinebench R23 scoring 44167, but single-thread performance becomes more relevant at high frame rates.
The i7-14700KF’s boost clock of 5.60 GHz and PassMark single-thread score of 4480 indicate strong per-core performance, which helps maintain high minimum frame rates. Across all resolutions, the data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at Ultra and High settings, while the CPU becomes more influential at lower presets where frame rates exceed 200 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates show a clear hierarchy: Low produces 124.8 FPS, Medium delivers 82.2 FPS, High reaches 67.9 FPS, and Ultra falls to 55.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 42.6 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 14.3 FPS, and the gap between High and Ultra narrows to 12.6 FPS. This pattern suggests diminishing returns as settings increase, with each step up in quality costing less performance than the previous step.
For 2560x1440, the results demonstrate strong overall performance: Low achieves 207.6 FPS, Medium hits 142.1 FPS, High reaches 121.5 FPS, and Ultra produces 90.7 FPS. The difference between Medium and High is 20.6 FPS, while the gap from High to Ultra is 30.8 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset demands a significant performance cost at this resolution.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high: Low delivers 263.3 FPS, Medium reaches 202.6 FPS, High achieves 173.7 FPS, and Ultra produces 130.4 FPS. The scaling from Ultra to Low is a 2.02x improvement, which is the smallest of the three resolutions, indicating that the CPU becomes a limiting factor when frame rates approach 250 FPS and beyond.
The data shows that all settings at 1080p and 1440p clear the 60 FPS threshold, including the most demanding Ultra preset. At 4K, only Ultra fails to reach 60 FPS, while High, Medium, and Low all maintain playable frame rates. The measured averages provide a complete picture of performance across the 12 tested configurations.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU’s nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with a score of 69996 and a deltaPct of 0.2, meaning it performs nearly identically to the i7-14700KF’s score of 70163. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 (deltaPct 0.4), while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X reaches 69515 (deltaPct 0.9). The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70879 (-1 deltaPct), indicating it is slightly faster than the i7-14700KF.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon 8060S has an average score of 55757 (deltaPct 0.6) compared to the RTX 5080’s 56083, making it a close match. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (deltaPct 0.7), while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X reaches 54828 (deltaPct 2.3). The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57367 (-2.2 deltaPct), indicating it outperforms the RTX 5080 by a small margin in synthetic benchmarks.
In Rust specifically, these rivals would likely produce similar frame rates to the measured results, with the caveat that actual game performance can vary based on driver optimizations and specific engine characteristics. The data shows that the i7-14700KF and RTX 5080 sit in a competitive position relative to their nearest alternatives, with all rivals falling within a 2.3% performance difference.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 106th out of 3723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the top 2.8% of all configurations. This high ranking reflects the strong performance measured across all resolutions and presets, with the combo demonstrating capability at both 1080p and 1440p Ultra settings.
The percentile rankings support this position: the CPU ranks in the 94th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 87th percentile versus all GPUs. The combination of a top-tier processor and high-end graphics card produces a well-balanced system for Rust, where both components contribute to the overall frame rates. The rank of 106 out of 3723 indicates that only a small fraction of tested combinations outperform this pairing, and those that do likely feature even more powerful hardware.
The Verdict
This PC can run Rust effectively at all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 130.4 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings produce 90.7 FPS, providing a smooth experience with full visual quality. At 3840x2160, the High preset achieves 67.9 FPS, which clears the playable threshold, while Ultra falls short at 55.3 FPS.
The verdict by resolution confirms that all three resolutions have at least one playable preset, with 1080p and 1440p supporting the highest quality settings. At 4K, users can choose between High settings at 67.9 FPS, Medium at 82.2 FPS, or Low at 124.8 FPS, depending on their preference for visual fidelity versus frame rate headroom. The data indicates that this combo is well-suited for Rust across the full range of display resolutions.
FAQ
Q: What is the maximum playable preset at 4K resolution?
A: The High preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS at 3840x2160, producing an average of 67.9 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold at 55.3 FPS.
Q: Can this system run Rust at Ultra settings in 1440p?
A: Yes, at 2560x1440 the Ultra preset delivers an average of 90.7 FPS, which comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four tested presets at this resolution are playable.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70163, while the closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, scores 69996 with a deltaPct of 0.2. This means the two processors perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks.
Q: What is the frame rate at 1080p with Low settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the measured average frame rate is 263.3 FPS. This is the highest frame rate recorded across all tested configurations.
Q: Does the GPU outperform its nearest rival?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083, while the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (deltaPct 0.6). The RTX 5080 is slightly faster, but the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57367 (-2.2 deltaPct), indicating it is faster than the RTX 5080.
Q: How many total combinations does this setup rank against?
A: The combo ranks 106th out of 3723 tested combinations in Rust, placing it in the top 2.8% of all configurations tested.