Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 53 | 59 | 90 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 90 | 106 | 153 |
| 1080p Full HD | 100 | 128 | 154 | 223 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti combination delivers a wide range of performance in Rust, scaling from a demanding 38.2 FPS at 4K Ultra to a fluid 222.5 FPS at 1080p Low. Benchmark data confirms this pairing is highly capable across most settings, with the primary limitation emerging only at 3840x2160 with higher presets. The measured results show a clear pattern: at 1080p and 1440p, the system comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, while 4K requires a reduction in graphical fidelity to maintain smooth gameplay.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of how this hardware configuration handles Rust across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 38.2 at Ultra to 90.2 at Low. The High preset yields 52.6 FPS, while Medium sits at 59.4 FPS. This resolution demonstrates the most significant performance drop as settings increase, with a 52 FPS difference between Low and Ultra.
At 2560x1440, the results show a substantial improvement. The Low preset achieves 152.6 FPS, Medium reaches 105.8 FPS, and High delivers 90.4 FPS. The Ultra preset still maintains a solid 68.5 FPS, representing a 30.1 FPS advantage over the 4K Ultra result. The scaling between 4K and 1440p is particularly evident at the High preset, where the average FPS jumps from 52.6 to 90.4, a 71.9% improvement.
The 1920x1080 results are the strongest in the dataset. Low settings produce 222.5 FPS, Medium achieves 154.1 FPS, and High delivers 128.3 FPS. The Ultra preset maintains 99.9 FPS, which is nearly double the 4K Ultra performance. The gap between 1440p and 1080p is smaller than between 4K and 1440p, suggesting diminishing returns at lower resolutions. For instance, at Ultra settings, the increase from 1440p to 1080p is 31.4 FPS, while from 4K to 1440p is 30.3 FPS.
The data indicates that the RTX 3080 Ti's 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for Rust at all tested configurations, as no minFps or maxFps anomalies are present in the dataset. The performance envelope suggests the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K, while at lower resolutions, the CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads may begin to play a larger role in sustaining high frame rates.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the only preset that clears the 60 FPS playable threshold is Low, which delivers 90.2 FPS. The Medium preset at 59.4 FPS falls just below the threshold, making it unsuitable for consistent smooth gameplay. High and Ultra at 52.6 and 38.2 FPS respectively are not viable options at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, all four presets exceed 60 FPS. The most demanding preset that remains playable is Ultra, which achieves 68.5 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the threshold while offering the highest visual quality. High at 90.4 FPS and Medium at 105.8 FPS are also excellent options for users who prefer higher frame rates over maximum fidelity.
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering 99.9 FPS. This nearly doubles the 60 FPS threshold, leaving substantial headroom for demanding scenes or future updates. The Low preset at 222.5 FPS is available for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, but Ultra offers the best balance of visual quality and performance.
The verdict data confirms that 1440p Ultra and 1080p Ultra are the optimal configurations for this hardware, with 4K limited to Low settings for playable frame rates.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how the workload shifts between the Intel Core i7-14700KF and the RTX 3080 Ti. At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor. The transition from Low to Ultra at 4K reduces average FPS from 90.2 to 38.2, a 57.6% drop, which aligns with the GPU's rendering load increasing with pixel count and graphical effects. The CPU's role is less prominent at this resolution, as the frame rates are well within its capabilities.
At 2560x1440, the balance begins to shift. The difference between Low and Ultra is 84.1 FPS (152.6 to 68.5), which is smaller in percentage terms than at 4K. This suggests the CPU is starting to contribute more to performance, as lower resolution reduces GPU load and allows the processor to become a more significant factor. The i7-14700KF's high single-thread performance, evidenced by its 6235 score in Cinebench R23 single-core, helps maintain strong frame rates here.
At 1920x1080, the CPU's importance becomes most apparent. The Low preset achieves 222.5 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's maximum frame output capability in Rust. The gap between Low and Ultra shrinks to 122.6 FPS, indicating that while the GPU still matters, the CPU's ability to feed frames becomes a limiting factor at very high frame rates. The i7-14700KF's 28 threads and 33 MB of shared L3 cache provide ample parallel processing power for the game's simulation and entity update logic.
The data shows that for this game, the RTX 3080 Ti is the primary bottleneck at 4K, while the i7-14700KF becomes increasingly relevant at 1080p. The 1440p resolution represents a balanced midpoint where both components contribute meaningfully to overall performance.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with High settings?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 52.6, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Low preset is the only playable option at this resolution, achieving 90.2 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?
A: The Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, delivering 68.5 FPS at 2560x1440. All lower presets also exceed the threshold, with Low at 152.6 FPS, Medium at 105.8 FPS, and High at 90.4 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti perform relative to the RTX 5070?
A: According to the nearestRivals data, the RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41187, which is 2% higher than the RTX 5070's score of 40377. The RTX 3080 Ti also ranks in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs.
Q: Is the i7-14700KF a strong CPU for gaming?
A: The i7-14700KF ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70163. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, scores 69996, a 0.2% difference. This indicates the CPU provides ample headroom for demanding games like Rust.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 154.1, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This provides a smooth experience with room for high-refresh-rate displays.
Q: Why is the 4K Ultra preset so demanding?
A: The 4K Ultra preset achieves only 38.2 FPS, which is the lowest result in the dataset. This represents a 66.4 FPS drop from the 4K Low preset, indicating that the combination of high resolution and maximum graphical effects places a heavy load on the RTX 3080 Ti's rendering capabilities.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearestRivals data, several hardware options would behave similarly to this combination. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, just 0.2% below the i7-14700KF's 70163 average. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is also close at 69875, a 0.4% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, which is 0.9% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K actually scores higher at 70879, representing a -1% delta, meaning it would perform approximately 1% better in CPU-bound scenarios.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has an average score of 40377, which is 2% lower than the RTX 3080 Ti's 41187. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, just 0.8% below. The NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB scores 41707, which is 1.2% higher, while the standard Tesla M40 achieves 41897, a 1.7% advantage. These figures indicate that the RTX 3080 Ti sits in a competitive performance band, with the RTX 5070 being the closest mainstream alternative.
In practice, swapping to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K might yield slightly higher frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p, while the RTX 5070 could be a near-identical GPU replacement with marginally lower performance. The AMD options would provide similar CPU performance within a 1% margin, making them viable alternatives for system builders.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700KF and RTX 3080 Ti combination ranks 793rd out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places the system in the top 21.3% of all configurations in the benchmark database. Given that the combination includes a CPU in the 94th percentile and a GPU in the 83rd percentile, the ranking reflects a well-balanced pairing that performs strongly across most resolutions and settings.
The rank is particularly impressive when considering the GPU's percentile. The RTX 3080 Ti, despite being in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, contributes to a combo rank that is higher than its individual percentile might suggest. This indicates that the i7-14700KF's strong CPU performance helps boost the overall gaming experience, especially at lower resolutions where the CPU becomes more influential.
The top 21.3% placement means this system outperforms the majority of tested configurations in Rust, but it is not at the absolute top tier. Users with higher-ranked combos would likely see better performance at 4K Ultra or even higher frame rates at 1440p, but this setup still delivers excellent playability in most scenarios.
The Verdict
This PC can run Rust successfully, with the verdict data confirming playable performance at all three tested resolutions, though with limitations at 4K. At 3840x2160, the system is playable only with the Low preset, achieving 90.2 FPS. The Medium preset at 59.4 FPS just misses the 60 FPS threshold, making it borderline but not recommended for consistent smoothness.
At 2560x1440, the system is playable at all four presets, with the best settings being Ultra at 68.5 FPS. This provides a high-quality experience with a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. The High preset at 90.4 FPS offers even more headroom for users who prefer higher frame rates.
At 1920x1080, the system excels, with Ultra settings achieving 99.9 FPS. This is the optimal configuration for this hardware, delivering excellent visual quality while maintaining near-100 FPS performance. The Low preset at 222.5 FPS demonstrates the system's capability for competitive play or very high refresh rate monitors.
Overall, this combination is well-suited for Rust at 1080p and 1440p, with Ultra settings providing smooth gameplay. At 4K, users must compromise with Low settings to stay above 60 FPS. The system's 793rd rank out of 3723 combos confirms its position as a strong, upper-tier performer for this game.